PC 72-321~ w RESOLUT~O. PC72-321 ~
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
THAT PETITION FOR VARIANCE N0. 2459 BE ~ GRANTED IN PART
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim did receiva u verified Petition for Vaziance from
EMIL E. BLANKMEYER, 403 East Broadway, Anaheim, California 92805, Owner of certain
real property situated in the-City of Anaheim, CounCy af Orange, State af California,
described as Lots No. 1 and 2 of Smith and Dean~s Re-subdivision; and
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at the City Hall in the City of Maheim on
December 11, 1972, at 2:00 o'clock p.m., notice of;said public hearing having been duly given as required by law and
in accordance with the'provisions of the Anaheim Mu~dcipal Code,~Chapter 18.68, to heaz and codsider evidence for and against said
proposed variance and to investigate and make findinqs and recommendations in connection therewith; and
WHEREAS, said Commission, aiter due i~.~spection, investigation, and study made by itself and in ets behalf, and after due
consideration of all evidence and reports offered at said'nearing, does find~and determine the following facts:
1. Thatthepetitionerrequests: variance§,.,~~ZAi~,th,~,•;~lnafieim Municipal Code as follows:
a. SECTION-18,32.Q20 - Permitted:uses. (To permit a use (saw sharpening)
that i's not permitted in the R-3 Zone)
b. SECT~ION 18.62.155(a) - PermiCted si~ns. (One 8-square-foot sign permitted.
~ for commerciai use of a reaideatial structure;.tom
~3 square-foot wall signs proposed)
a c. SECTTON 18.04.030(b)1 - Mini+~um number of required parking spaces. ('Ltao
spaces required; no~additional spacea provided for
commercial use)
2. ThaC the petiCioner withdrew Waiver 1-b, above mentioned, and stipulated to,pXo,- ~``
~iding only one 3 square-foot sign attached to the fence along the Olive Street side of
sula,ject property. .
3. That the petitioner stipulated that• he would be the only person involved in the
use and that no employees would be required.
4. That there are exceptfonal or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable
to the property invalved or ta the intended use of the property that do not apply generally
to tUe property or class of use in the same vicin•Lty and zone.
5. That che requested variance is neces~ary for the presetvation and enjoyment of a~
.substantial property right possessed by other property in the same vicinity and zone, and
denied to the properCy in question.
6. That the requested variance will not be materially iletr~mentsl to the public wel-
fare or injurious to the property or improvemants,..ia..snch vicinity and zone in which the
property is located.
7, That one person a~peared in oQpoaition to waiver of the required parking.
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FINDING:
a~ t e ann ng omm saion n s and determines that the proposal would have no signifi-
cant ~environmental mpact and, therefore, recommends to the City Council that Exemption
Declaration status ~e~ granted. -1-
~,
. ..
in part
I NOW, TFIEREFORE, BE IT RES~ ED that the Anaheim City Plenning Commission does heceby grarvf,/subject
PeUtion for Veriance, upon the following conditions which are hereby found to ~e e necefisery p:erequIsite to the pm-
posed use oE the subject propecty in ocder to preserv_e the sefety and general welfa:e ~rif the Citizens of the City of
.... "'~`
, _.._. _ _,,
_-
Anaheim: - _ .... _ - ,
~~.
r ~~
(1) That the owner(s) of subjeat }roperty shall deed to the:,:,City of Anaheim a strip of
land ten fPet in width from the centerline of the alley for alley'~widening purposes and a
fifteen-foot radius property line.retutn. _
(2) That subject praperty tahall be developed subritantially in accordance with plans
and specificatio~s on file with the City of Anaheim .cerked Exhibit Nos. 1, 'L, and 3 provi~'ef~,
however, ~hat there shall by only one 3 square-foot sign to be erected on the Olive Street
side of subject property atid shall be attach~d to the existing fence, as stipulated to by
the petitiF- rer.
(3) That the requested use shall be granted for a period of three years and upon re-
quest by the petitioner, an additional period of time may be granted upon approvsl by the
Planning Co~nission and/or City Council.
THE F1~REGOING RES~LUTION is sigacrl end approved by me thie
• /iC
ATTEST:
Aav nf TloepmhPr_~1972_
.
ei^~ ~~1' wrr~
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) se.
CTfY OF ANAHEIM ) " ~
I, Ann Krebs~, Seccetery of the City Plenning Commission of She City of Aneheim, do hereby cecHfy thet
the foregoing resolution was pessed and adopted et a meeting of the City Plenning Commission of the City of Aneheim,
held on December 11, 1972; et 2:00 o'clxk P.M., by the following vote oE the membecs theceof:
AYES: COMMIS9IONERS: ALLRED, GAUER, HERBST, ROWI.AND, SEYMOUR..
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: FaRANO, KAYWOOD.
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I heve heceunto aet my hend this 21st day of December, 1972.
~i~~ ~%~~, ~~
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
RESOLUTION NO. PC72-321
V2-G -2- ~,~
:.°•.~!y~ .K ~~ .
i ~` ~
,j:_
' , \ . ...,~~ . . ... ..v~