PC 72-325RESOLUTIO~. PC72-325 ~
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY PLANNING COHMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
THAT PETITION FOR CONDI'fIONAL USE PEP.MIT_.135LBE DENIED
'• WHEREAS, the City Plar.ning Commission of the City of Aneheim did ccceive a veriFied Petition for Con-
" ditional Use Permit from EDWARD W. BONKOSKY, Trustee, 600 Weat Lincol[t Avenue, Anaheim,
California 92805, Owner; BEACON BAY ENTERPRISES, INCORPORATED,. Z50 Newport Center
Drive, Newport Beach, California 92660, Agent of certain real.property situated in
the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, Stare of California, described as The South-
erly 190.0 feet as measured at right anglea from the South line of the West half of
the Northwest quarter of the Northwest quarter of the Nocthwest quarter of Section
~ 16, To~tnship << South, Range 10 West, as shown on a Map thereof recorded in Bonk 51,
page 10, Miacellaneaus Maps, records of said Orange County; said land being further
described ae Che Southerly i90.0 feet, as measured at righC angles from the South
line of the West half of Lot 4 of Helen and Lynch°s Addition to Anaheim, as shown on
a map thereof recorded in Book 442, page 188, Deeds, records of Los Angeles County,
California ,
; and
WHEREAS, the City Plenning Commission did hold a public hearing et the City Hell in the City of Meheim
. n December 11, 1972, et 2:00 o'clock P.M., notice of seid public hearing having been duly given
8$ cequired by law end in accordence wlth the provisions of the Aneheim Municipel code, Chepter 18.64,to heac
and consider evidence for end egeinst said proposed conditional use end to investigate end meke findings and
recommendatlon~ in connection therewith; and
WHEREAS, seid Commission, after due inspection, invesdgetion, and study mede by itself end xn its br
helf, end after due considcretion of eIl evidence end repods offered et sald hearing, does find and determine the
following fects:
1. Thet the proposed use is properly one for which e Condttional Use Permit is authorized by Code
Section 18,64.020(3-g) to wit: establiah a carwe~sh; and Section 18.40.060(g): establish
an automobile service station within 75 feet of a residential zone with waivera of:
a. SECTION 18.40.040 - Permitted outdoor usea. To permit outdoor wax-
ing, polishing and detailing of automobiles.
b, SECTION 18.40.020(b) (3) - Permitted location of service station limited
to the interaection of two arteriel hiRhwava.
2, That the praposed use would not be located at the interseation •of two arterials
and would have an impact by injecting very heavy traffi:a loads into a residential atreet
as well as at a"T" intersection cresting many traffic hazards.
3. That ber.ause of the .extremely heavy traffic on the arterial, vehiclea exiting
the proposed use on thie property would be subjected to insutmountable traffic problema,
particularly when attempting to make left turns into traffic from the premiaea.
4. That although the petitioner was awa:e of the fact that the City of Anaheim had
specific limitatior.s an sound emiasion by equipment, the decibal readinge this use would
produce as atated by the petitioner, would exceed this resding and no evidence was pre-
aented that said noises cGUld be mitigated to protect the restdential uaes to the eaat,
5. That representatives of the adjoining commercial facilities expressed very aerious
concern that the proposed use would be detrin~ental to the existing commercial usea estab-
lished in the area.
6. That the proposed use will adversely a£fect the adjoining land uses and the growth
and development of the area in which it ia prop~oaed to be located.
CI-D " 1"
~
~
~
7. That the proposed use would be detrimental to the particular area and ~o the
peace, heaith, safety, and general welfare of the Citizens of the City of Anaheim.
8. That four persons appeared, representing five persons present ir, the Council
Chamber, in opposition to the proposed use.
NOW, THEREFORE, HE IT RESOLVED that the Acaheim City Plenaing Commiasion does heceby dmy subject
Petition for Conditional Use Pe~it on the basis of the aforementloned findings.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is signed end epproved by me this ~lst day of December, 1972.
ANAHEIM
ATTEST:
~i~/~'~1~~~'a~.~
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
STATE OF CALIF012NIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) es.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I,.. Ann Krebs ~S~retery oE the City Planning Commiselon of the City of Maheim, do hereby caRify that the fore-
goiag cesolution wes pessed end adopted at a meeting of the City Plenning Commiseioa ofthe City of pneheim, held on
December 11, 1972 et 2:00 o'clock P.M., by the•following vote of the members thereof:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: ALLRED, FARANO, GAUER, HERBST, KAYWOOD, ROWLAND, SEYMOUR.
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE,
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have he~eunto set my hend thie 21st day of°'Diecember, 1972.
~i~ 7LS~LC,/i''oi
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
RESOLUTION NO. P~72~325
C2-D '~
.. ~ .- .