PC 72-328RESOLUTION J~ PC72-328 ~
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION OFl 60 CITY OF ANAHEIM
THA'T PETITION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT BE DENIED
WHEREAS, the City Plenning Commission of the City of Anahelm did receive e vetified Petitlon for Con-
~'itionalUse Permitfrom DAVID DOERING, 1203 Weat Lincoln Avenue, Anaheim, California 92801,
Owner of certafn real property situated in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, Sta~P
of California described as Lots No. 19, 20, 21 and 22 of Block 3, Summerfield and Op. -
heimers Subdivision as recorded in Book 19, Page 44, Miacellaneoas Records of Los Angeles
County
; and
WHEREAS, the CityPlenning Commission did hold e public hearing et the CityHell in the City ot Meheim
on December 11, 1972, at Z:00 o'clock P.M., notice of said publlc hearlag heving been duly given
ea required by lew and in eccordance with tF,e provisions oE the Maheim Municipal code, Chopter 18.64, to hear
and consSder evidmce for and egeinst soid proposed conditional use and to InvestIgete and meke Eindings and
rernmmendetions in connection therewlth; and
WHEREAS, said Commission, after due inepectlon, investi~ation, and study made by itaelf and in its br
half, end after due consideretion oE all evidence and reposts oEtered at said headng, does find and determine the
following Eects:
1. That the praposed uae is properly one Eor which s Conditionel Uae Permit is authorized by Code
Section ?8.44.010(b-2) to wit: establiah a cocktail luunge in an exiating commercial
atructure.
2, That the propoaed use would be incompatible with adjoining residential laad
uses and would be more acceptable if propoaed in conjunction with reataurent operations.
3. That the proposed use will adversely affect the ad~oining land uses and the
growth and development of the area in which it is propoaed to be located.
4. That the aize and ehape of the eite propoaed for the uae ie not adequate to
allow the full development of the proposed use in a manner not detrimental to the per-
ticular area nor to the peace, health, safety, and general welfare of the Citisens ~of
the City of Anaheim.
5. That the granting of the Cor.ditional Uae Permit will he detrimental to the
peach, health, eafety, and general welfare of the Citizens of the City of Aneheim.
6. That two persons appeared in opposition.
ENI~IRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FINDING:
That the Planning Commission finda e.nd determines that the proposal would have no eigni-
ficant environmental impact and, therefore, recammende to the City Cauncil that Exemption
Declaration statue be granted.
CI•D ' 1"
~
~
~
NOW, TFIEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that !he Aaaheim City Plenning Commiesion does heceby ds-~y subJect
Petitlon for Condltional Use Pecmit oa the baais of the atocemeatioaed flndings.
THE FOREGOII~G RESOLUTION ie nigned ~nd epproved by me this ~lst day o~-9eicember, 1972.
ANAHEIIH CITY
ATTEST:
~i~~yl/~'~.~[~ jL'~""..~~
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
STATE OF CALIFORNLA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) sa.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, .Apn Krebe,Secretary of the City Planaing Commi~sloa of the City oE Ana6eim, do hereby cedify that the forr
going cceoluUon was p~~ssed aad adopted at a meetln` of the City Planalna Commission oE the City oE pnaheim, held on
December 11, 1972, at 2:00 o'clock P.M., by the tollowfng ~vote of the membees thereof:
AYES: CQh'~YIISSI0NER5: ALY.RED, FARANO, T,AUER, KAYWOOD, SEYMOUR,
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: 1:DNE.
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: HERBST, RpWLAND.
IId WTfNES~ WF{ErEOF, I hr.ve hareunto set mp 6end tLis 21et day of December, 1972,
RESOLUTION H0. PC72-328
SECRETARY MTAHEIM CI'CY PLANNING COMMISSION
C2-D '~