PC 72-332-- __ _
RESOL ~ N N0. PC72-332 ~
A RESOLUTION OF THE C1TY PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
THAT PETITION EOR VARIANCE N0. Z451 gE DENIED
WHEREAS, the City Pianninq Commission of the City of Maheim did receive a verified Petition for Variance from
ANAHEIM HILLS INCORPORATED AND TEXACO VENTURES, INCORPORATED, 380 Anaheim Hills Road,
Anaheim, California 92806, Ownera of certain real property sit+iated in the City of
Anaheim, County of Ofange, State of California, as described in Exhibit "A" attathed
hereto and referred to herein as though set forth in full; and
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did hold a pubtic hearing at the City Hall in the City of Maheim on
December 27, 1972, at 2:00, o'clock p.m.; notiee of said public hearing having been duly given as required by law and
in accordance with the'provisions of the Maheim Municipal Code, Chapter 18.68, to hear and consider evidence for and against said
praposed variance and to investigate and make findings aad recommendations in connection therewith; and
WHEREAS, said Commission, ~~er due inspectton, investlgatlon, and study mede by ilself and in its bxhelf, end after duc
consideration of all evidence and reports offered at said hearing, dces find and determine the following facts:
1. That the petitioner requeats r the ~ follmiing~~vari'lrices, from~ the Anaheim Municipal Code Eo
permi.t the establiahment of a 184 lot subdivieion - R-1:
a. SECTION 18.04.075 - Requir2ment that residential lots rear on arCerial
hiqhways, (Side-on lote requeated)
b. SECTION 18.24.030(4-a) - Minimum lot width, (70 feet required; lota having
~ 7 ns han 70 feer proposed)
c. SECTION 18.08.550 - Minimum width of cul-de-eac lots, (60 feet on a
tangene line drawn at the middle point of the aet-
back radiua required; minimum of 37 feet propoaed)
d, SECTION 18.24.030(4-b) - Minimum lot area. (7200 equare feet required; 24
lota ranging from 6000 to 7100 aquare feet propoaed)
2, That although the Planning Commisaion requested that the developer request a fer-
ther continuance to reviae the kract map redesigning Lot Nos. 1, 17, and. 18 to reflect the
minimum 40-fooC building aetback required by the subdivLeion ordinance, and redeaign Lot
N~s, 143, 144, and 145, which were propoaed ta be served by an easement; the deve].oper was
unwil,ling to cooperate and requeated that the Commission take action without any further.
continuance.
3. That the petitioner~s unwillingneas to cooperate cauaed grave concern to the Plan-
ning Commisaion that fukure development of Anaheim Hills would be conl•rary to denaities
approved in the General Plan, which would conflict with eatablished development standards;
and that the living environment for said area would be less than desirable.
4. That the density proposed woul~d be too great, and exiAting street patterns would
be inadequate to handle this increased density.
Vl-D - l -
DEV-66•E
~. . .. ~ . . _ _
.7
~~HIBIT "t.~'~
•
.p~ ~~c ~t r, .
~'V.Y~~Ek.iilA .C;~T.Ivl.SIF.^.'i,Y1~ .~i,r..GQCJ.u.L~Ga
cxvrr rr.~rr?••z:~:~;.s .
~zc s. c~nuuinn Lr.
l~I:AIiGIM. CALII'OItN1A nzooa
pHONC 77A-'3740
p[~v(y.~~7:Oi~ i'Ch itl\~1~-1(]iiei ~•~;E..~ci~ ~i\C.
(C:::;trir?ryu) itcvi~ctl 5ejste~nbcr :7,YI~i:.
~4 ;.~ort on at' ttso itancha S~m~}uc,o d~3 Sa11i~ Alt~, tn the City of P.»al~el~u, ln Yze Coch:;•
oi :)ra;:ga, ::ate c~F Calt(u; nic+, ~c:i:i~ ~i1ai ~ertlott of th~ I<u:d cicscrfbca In .fi:• rin~:i
to l.n~~h~im Hifls, Irlr,,, ~ G<<Itfoi-iii~: c~~rpas•atin:~, reccrded or~ Julp 29, 1"71 w~ Ins.rum~n:
~lu. 2~i97G, .11 Qoaic 97?T, P::ge : G2, eE ~cq., af Offiel::i tir.cord :, in t:i~ alflC:: ~Ji t'r~e
C~unty Recorder of ~a{c1 Counry ~a~illch lics ~a•ithln tttc, fotlo~•ring dc::lr.ril~cd lanundaric~:
13c;~l:tszing ~~l a potnt in the ~u~•~»vesterly line o~ CI~aY ce~•Wtn land atintted to l~::nj :ml~~r
arid'1'mm~as h~inY a~i~9 I..letvcily7 L'i;:i~y In tf~;e F'~ZrUtion of 417e f:~~zchu Sanxtag~ de Sa^ta
Anci, cii:izni ti~areot~ twrth 3r° 5i~' 3'~" [:ast, 33~.1.6G ica: Erom l:he Ido~ th~ast crri3er ot
tlto ;and dc~u•ihc~ in the decd to ~. ntlac7u Farmc:rs A:~socl~tiu~t, r~~cordec! In ~wle n~,
P~,ry~~ 5~«! af L?ucds, in tit:: c„ficc~ uf tite C:ou.ih/ I?ecc~rder of Lus Anc~el<:s Cc~unty, Caflf-
crt':!a; Ehencc (eavin~t s~ld ~lorthwesterl~ lii~c, i~orti•i 5'f°09' 7.2" Yle:,t, 153~l.:~3 fa~t ta
Cha B~UYhe~s:crly t•ar~nlnus of a nuirt:~n,r,eiil c4rva cci7r.avc t•lorlhcast~sri}~ anci liauirin a
r:,tliu; ~~i' Sv0.00 ft:nt, a radiul Ilnc c~f said cttrva b~ors 5outh G~1°f:7' iG" ~~esL, i~;ro~~c;h
~~E:! ~>uln.; t.llcz:r::: Itortherly alonc~ ; aicl cuf•v •r, throu;;t~ a canl~~al ~nnlc crf 2S° :~~ 50° u:i
arc dEa:arc~ of 223.81 fc=_~t; tl•~e.:~ca lsri:~c•nt t~orlh U°7.u' QG" Ga~k, 39i.q2 f~ct to a~~ncl:•nt
citrv~: coctcavc Southtiv::strrly ~md ~z~.~inc,+ u t•adlus uf SL~O.QO ft:et; thenr.c idorih~re:st4:~iy
aiorin saEci curv~ USrot~;;h s, cciSU•at an~tle uf rt5° 29' 35", an arc dts.ancr~ o( 3~7.G0 f'~:~:i•;
fhn7;:c: tangc~zt I~lorth 1~5°Q3~ ~9" Gd~:st, ;:s5.1~ Fa::t; t}:r,nCCd:u1'ti~ 13~i° 5G' 31" C~,:;t, 2;;,i:G
ter.~ t~~ the tr~i~ ~~olt~t~uf bc:,ryinni~iy ~~ti 1Y~c lanu hcr~in cfesci•ib•_d, salti true ~~olnt of
bectlr~:~ing l~e+lnr~ on tl~c~ C~stert~~ line oE t~~c: 5'.~-faot wIde cnsarn::~~l• deacrlbed in the d:~•x:i
t.o th~ h,fe:lropo~ltan 55`at:ir Ul::irtct of .~cults2rn Cali(arntu by deacf recorded In L'4~o:: 3i7~,
i',:gc ~Z, et se~., ~f s~~id U(ricl~l 12r,curG;; thrnc^ alung s~~id L"•astorry 11n~ as t'u(lo~v~:
Narth iG°1~2' fI5" 1'a'est, 141.°3 fcet fo tix: Ur~iizning ui a tangcr~t eui'VE: GOIlC8V4 L:~~~tc.i•:~,
I10VI1'It~ 3 I'F~LIIUS of ?.75.00 f~4t; th~nc~ i~l.~rthcrh/ e~lon~ sald cu~-vc U~ruuqit n centr~ii
ut7g(e ~f 24°27' r12", an arc ulS4~~~GO uf 115.93 feet; th~s~~ce langcnt. Nurlti 7°33' S7" ~r.'.:SSi,
4l10,GU feet to ti~e !~c~innin~~ ~+f n tan,r,::ni curvc cc»'~cave :o4~i~ca~t.:r:y having ~ r•r,cllu::
of 7.7 r.GO fc::t; Ut:r~cc h~urtf•~::a:•t.:rly alun;; s::ir.i c~rvc tlvcugl~ a c.ail~•7{ ~nqio of l'l° :t3'
L-J", ;m ;~t'e dlstatice of 5~. ~!S f~ack; li~cnc~ t~~~nct~i "lortii ?.5° 02' OG" 'r_':~ct, 3^.O.G~ f:,t;
tt1::~tr.c, I.~urtn 3 i° 35' 07° r:~si, Y57..: , f:~:~t tu thr br.~iru•~inr1 0` ~+ tan~~nt curvc canc~;vc,
Norfhwesterly~ hovlnq a r~tliu:: of 32c;.GG f~::;t; L'tic.~cc tdor~hr~.stet'ly ulu»g satd curva
tlzraagh a canSrul angtc ot 17° 1i~' 3~,", urr arr, dir,tar.r.c v!` 17.!)T fc~t; 13r,:»c~ [angont
Waril~ ]4° 2U' 33" ~c;st, ~~ di: t~nce ~i 3fi3.'s9 fc~•t; tiu:nce tc~vi»c,~ said ~a::la•ty {inc si~d
~•urn~in!7 rn 3 bearln~ of G~s:, a ciistanc^ ~f 91J.5j~ feet; ii~onr,e Snuth 23° 15' UO" Ea:;t,
Cont'd. . .
~Af~i~yCE Pd~~..........~:~~~..r.....~...-....
~
~
~
~
~
Dcsc~•t~tiun far A~zahcirn H!t!s
[~strid ;e UnfE
Pac~c Z...
q29.91 ~rcet, tr~~nce South !19° ZJ' 1%" 1',ic~t, 22:.7.2 f•~c:, thance on a h~aring af 5ou41~
390~0~ IL~4L~ chcnce Sauth ~:0° 5tE' 13" L~s;, '•G7.7.S fe.t; th~ne.e Suuth r~3° RG' ~;2" 1'~est,
z29.19 fc~t; L'~mnco on a ~earing ~( Sauth 7Q.00 fc~ t; cl~e»ce 5auth 51° 1;U' ~S" 1`Jest,
351:.77 {'eef; tii^ncs 5outl~ 7° 5~' 2n" 11~est, 139.3U f:~~t; ihenc~a .~'.outh 14° 59' 'SE~° Ga:.t,
2~iQ.Os: fcct; 4heiicc ~out.~ 33° t i' !~~" Viesc, 195. ~2 ;:a: t; t~1L'11CC: .ciUU:{1 SG° QR' 07" Ytest,
:t:°.!~'T f:at; tiZence S,uth 11° 12' 3C" t°Jcst, 331.+!'S ~~ci: thetu:e PlarCh 7ii°03' S1° ti.est,
77.G2 fe:ct; th,t1CC i\GPUi 3i°a4' 3:i° tY.st, 223.6G fe:l; lL•~sn~e Norttti Nf°03' ~:~° lYest,
39t.25 feet; thenec~ tdorth 53°Ojl' 07° iVes~, 122.ft6 fc~:t tu a poln. b~ a i~cn-t~ncent
cui'V~ GOt1C~VC fa~PtllYlCSirl'I}~ having a rar114s uf 7~00.00 fec:t, a radia! line af sald
curv3 G:-a~-s 5otiiil !'i3° il!F' 61" L'•ast, lf~rpu,n,it saitl ~+oint; thenee SoutFnvesterly aloc~g
uald curvc Lhruuyll a ccnt-•al an~la aF ti°QO' 37." an arc clist~+ncr, oi 13).7II fcat to a linn
t~n~ar~t k~ ~•~i~! ~~urve ~~rltich be~rs tdor~h 4~~° 55' 31" [as:• frc~m Ui~ tr~ta point oF
t~e~inr~ln;7; tt;~n.:c :iu:J111 ~4G°aG~ 31" tiYest along saic! lina, Z?.7..9t1 fcet to th3 trua
paint,ai l~cc~in-~l~ig. Cuntainhtg G3.25? ac~•cs, inurc ~i• less.
SuUjcct to cove~~ants, co:,ditlens, resorv~tions~ restrictinns, ric~hts, rtghts, of v+ay
and eu~urr,enY~, if ~ny, of record. -
vAft1AI~CE N0. _,,,~~,`~~ ,~,,,.,.,~.
< ~.
-~
~ .
~
5. That the proposed easement lots, elthough designated as "view lots", would be extremelq~
difficult to maintain, since one lot wou7.d be bisected by a road creating a public thorough-;+;;%:'
fare on private property which the property awner of said lot would be required to maintain. ,'.
6, That several lots were proposed to side on to an arterial street, thereby creating the
possibility of conversion of these lote for coaunercial use in the future, based on requests
that the Commiesion has faced in the past fn similar situations elsewhere in the City.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED th~t tlw Anaheim City PI~nn1aQ Commisoion doei hereby deay snbJect
Petition for Vadence on t6e b~sis of t6e doremmdioe~d liadiaQs.
THE FOREGOIIdG RESOLUTION is siRned a-d approved by me this 4th day of January, 1973.
~
RI[AN ANAHEIId CI PLANNIN OMMISSfON
ATTEST: •
~~~I%/~/ ~ , ~ ~.~ :
~~
SECRETARY ANAFIEAt CITY PLANNING COMMISSION ~"'''°=
STA'fE OF CALIFORNIA ) ~
COUNTY OF ORANt3E ) u. ~
C1Tl' OF ANAHEIM )
r.~,..._ ..
I,. Aan, Krebs, etaey of the City Planning Commission of ffie City of Mahelm,. do hereby ceetify th~t the fore-
~"'lo ng iesolutlon'w ~'pu~ed and ~doptad at a meetin~ oE the Ciry Pl~nnia~ CommG~~ioa of the Clty of Au~heim, held on
December 27, 19~2, ~t 2:00 o'clock p.M., bY the. following vote of ths mamb~~n therwE:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: ALLRED, FARANO, GAUER, NERBST, 1(AYWOOD, ROWLAND, SEYMOUR.
NOES: CObIMISSIONBRS: NONE.
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE. ~
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto eet my hand this 4th day of ,Jenuary, 1973.
,7'~~zu~s/
--, -
SECRETARY ANAHEIA[ CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
RESOLUTION N0. PC72-332
V2-D -2'