PC 72-4RESOLUTIO~. ar~~-4 ~
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANr'~HElA7
THAT PETITION FOR CONUITIONAL USE PERMIT12.fl5--3E DENIED
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission of the City of Aneheim did receive a verified Petition for Con-
ditionalUsePermit:rom THOMAS P. WALKER, 2855 East Pacific CoasL- Highway, Corona
Del Mar, California 92625, Owner; WZLL:abi J. HERRICK, Enviror.mental Leisure
Corpuration, 126 North ~ucl.id Nvenue, Fullerton, Cali1'ornia 92632, Agent,
of certain real property sitLated in che City of Anah~eim, County of Orange,
State of California, as described in Exhibit A attac)ied hereto and referred
to herein as though set forth in full
; end
WHERF.AS, the City Plenning Commission did hold a publin hearing at the City Hell in the City of Aneheim
on ~7 anuary 24 , 1972 , et 2:00 o'clock P.M., r.otlce of said public hearing heving been duly given
es cequired by law and in accordence with the pcovisions of tNe Meheim MunicipF~l code, Chapter 1A.64, !o hear
and consider evidence for and egainst seid proposed conditionel use end to inve:stigate end make findings and
recommenda;ions in cennectiort thecewith; and
WHEREAS, said Commissic~, efter ilue inspection, investigation, end shidy mnde by ;tselE end in its be-
halE, and efter due consideretiun of all evidence end repods otfeced et seid hearing, does find end determine the
[ollowing fects:
1. That the proposed use is properly one for which a Conditiopel Use Permit Is euthorized by Code ;
Section 18.b4.020(2-c) to wit: establiah a motel with waiver of:
;~CTION 18.37.040(B-4) - Permitted sign location. (85 feet from adjacent
property line required; 6 feet from adjacent property
line proposedj
2, That the proposed use would noC be serving the industrial comr:aaity primarily,
as required 'oy the existing ii-1 Zone on the property, since the petition~r atated that
only 25% of the anticipated Uusiness would be from industry, while the belance of 75%
would be from freeway traffic.
3, T.~iat the pro~~;ad use will adversely affect the adjoining land uses and Che
growth and development -f t~+~: area in ~rhich it is proposed to be located.
4. That a~yprovcl of the proFosed signing ~ould be granting the petiCioner a
privilege not enjoyed by other indue~rial uses in the area or within other industrtal
areas throughout the City of Aneheim.
5. That the petiti.oner stated that if aigning were not granted as pruposed, he
would abandon the project.
5. That one person appeared representing an adjoining industrial firm in oppoei-
tion.
CI-D ~ 1 ~
._ . _.._ . .. -
F~rm 1Ji~•i
~ CLTA Guor.•n~.•c .
For~n ~.lu. 12
SC-If:UUI.C ~
LU'1' C~Or~~~ ~,~;n,(';;~,fJTLr
/ ,
E~I~I.~.~7" <<,~;~
OfiDLf; N0. 03 1297u"0'r-!S
'I'he a.;ur.m,:os reterrc:! to on thc (a::c p:~~c ~re:
7hot, e~:cerciing to ti~e Con:Pi~1'S P«'PCrty record; relative to th: follo::in~ described rea! property (but vtithuut
examinotion of :hosa Compan•; rccorcis m~intained a~id indexed by nama):
1. Sliii !•.'fTkClilil) FOi: L]:Ge;t. llF:,C?tIPTIG?:.
A. TL•e last rccordccl ins!rumeut purporting to tronsler tiUc ta said real preperty is:
'L. ins ~~cxciu desc•ii~cd p_op~~rCy is vesteri r.s foll.o:r~:
TRD:1;~5 P. 41A1.l:lit:, as Co r.n undiv~.ded 1/2 Intei:ect :~nd TI10:iLS P. !•:f,i.Ki,l:, Tructee
ui::icr Tr.usC dated ?l:~y 1G, 1J71 as to .n uadi.vided 1/2 inCm'est.
ei
B
7here arc no mort9apes or decds ot trust which purport tn alfect saiJ rcal property, other than '
thosc shu•.vn b^lor+ unucr Exccptions. ~
tw~ / ~- ~
i::i ~ C T: ]. i''~ : iJ:; .
A)J. ;h~t r:,;? p:•o~~ :.~ iit Ci.c C:ii n; i:r::;ii~::ii.~, C:~,~.:t• cf C~:,:n;.c :r~.te of
G].).! o• .... L.ci ~ t i. ., r~:~: c i.:r.~ ni ~?,oC u c,f S;raCi~ i'? ~--, ...... Tr. ct: .in. 7. p~:..
t:~'p th,u'~. 1~( .. `coi'd,,., in T;ar~. 5, i, h?. ef .;it.cell.,r.^.,.., :f-~~:, rec;,nL: of
. ~ ~ . .
.~ , _ ..
:•:~:d Cc:°.,ty, ucrC•t~_r._:. ..., fo?.la,:i .
llliGi'1 ::G c.?: t:h;: 1.;itc~:;...:1'i.on of Chc c^i~~e~li:ie of \'.i.:: }~:irCOn ~Cr~~~:L', ~s
dc::c:,.i~c.' .:~ t.l~.. 'cc~i tn thc Cit~' af i~n:;heS:i .^-cordad .,~:pi:cr'~cr 3, 1559,
in 1)oni: •'f..J, Ya~,e 52`i c,f' Oifici::] i:_::o~ds, ctith .. ]in:. t::ii.ch is p::r;:Ucl
o;ith :.:r.l d',(;tant 237.U'? fr.c:t i:r:si:c~l.y n:~r..urc:ci at ~ri~;h~ ::n;;le: frc:,i o:.ntcr-
lin~ c~f. St^tr f•olJ.e;;~~ L'c~t;:e~a.rd, f.n_r,:crly (:y-~~r~:e.^> Skr.~eC, ~liclan ar: ::i en-
nc.~cd st:'ecr >len,; tt::~ 1'es[oi~y ~tu~ ot :.aid ].ot G; tlten;:o Soi~;:Les~ly along
.::id ~r;,::;~)..lel 3i~~e :'auC`~ fi° 15' 00" ii,~::t ]f;~.0~ fec:~ Cn .. line i~hich ia
p.~r.:l1r_] with :ud d:..[,:nt ]F,O.(10 Cr~:f. Suuih.~i•ly rrr:e.ir_•ccl^aC ri,;hC .~r].ts
fi:pr; ..^id cc:it:.rliuc`o•` \'i~ 1;urtor, St;:c~C; tt:c+tcc P...cLcrly .:l.c~,^. ....id la;t
~bc.vc^r~c,•.t9onr:d p::.ra?lr_]. l.Inc :10:1'l~ Fi)` 5G' G':'~ fi~st 31.OU fcet to a Jinc
trhitli i: p:~~.:1:ci. ~:iti~ •:nd di.clr.nc 2G8.00 fce[ £n::t.erJ.y is .;~::ured ;[~ riFL•C
.^n;;l.es fr~~c~.s;id C~RL^I'~li1C OL StaCe ColJapc arn:]ert:.d; tiienc. Sct;thctlt
.lonU :.i~l ]n>t ri~w•:r. isri~ti.:~:icd pa~'all.ccl 13nc Suutlt 0` 15' 00" lia~t J./;2.95
feet to tli_~ SoaCi~crly i i.ne of ihr.. ]::nc, convn~•ed to Co:;i~to Cara .se'me rnd
Anf,:lo I;atC::}•,';.e~i bj• dr.~d recordr.d ic.rch 17., 197.7, fn Iton': 21, F.'a,.^.~~ 30~i
o. sai~l Uif~cial ficc~~rds; tiicncc a.lrn~; said SouCh~rly lin^ t'orth S9` 57' 11"
F.ast lC~.Si fcet Co a li.ne par;+l.lel o!iih and di:lant 4!c5l'rrl.v ]GG.G7
feet, i;a: su.'ed alon; ~:~a.<1 center.l9.~~e of Vir: Eurt.on, fron tlic u~osC T+'~sCer-
].y ].9nc, <<rd tlie ;:<~rt~ior.7)• prolc~rif:::tion thereof, ot the lr.nct cu~r±e,~=d to
I;~al 1;l::dsoc, ct a].., h~ deed recorded }tarci~ G, 1464, 3n i;ook 6957., pa{;~
67 0!' ::aid O~.fici<il. l:~r.ord~; thcncc '~creh 0" 03' JG" l•!cst, 37.2.OD f.cet
to said cc~nl.crl.i.nc o;: \'it~ )lu~ton; LLrncr.'alcmr said ceutcr.Ji.nc o~ ~'i.a
ISureon, Sputh S9° 5G' h4' k'ec:: 21?.91. fce[ to the Poi.nt uf beginni.n~.
o •
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Meheim City Planning Cemmiseion does hetehy dmy subject
PetiUon for Conditionel Use Pertnit on the besis oE the aforementioned fiadingn.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is eip~ed end approved by me th5s 3rd day of February , 1972.
~~/~~~~
CHAIRMAN ANAHF.IM CITY PLANIVING COMMISSION
ATTEST:
(~(/YN~/ i~~1~fJl/_f!'a~
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY FLANNING COMMISSIOIZ
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, Ann Kreba , Secretery of the City Plenning Commission of the City oE Anaheim, do hereby certify thet the Eoc~-
going resolution wes peased end edopted et e meeting of the Clty Plenning Commission of the City oE Aneheim, held on
J an ua ry 2 4, 1 ~ 7 2, et 2:00 o'clock P.M., by the following vote oE the members thereof:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: ALLRED, GAUER, HERBST, KAYWOOD, SEYMOUR.
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: FARANO,
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE.
ABSTAIN: COMMISSIOVERS: 1~OWLAND.
IN WIT~ESS WHEREOF, I heve hereunto set my hend thia 3 rd da}' o£ Feb ruary , 19 72 .
RESOLUTION N0. P C 7 2- 4
/~~~cJ
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNII3~ COEiMISSION
C2-D -~