PC 72-99~ ~
RESOLUTION NO. PC72"99
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHrIM'
TEiAT PETITION FOR VARIANCE NO. 2360 HE GRANTED
14F1EREAS, the City Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim did receive a verified Petition for Variance
from EUCLID SHOPPING CENTER, 2293 Weat Ball Road, Anaheim, California 92804, Owner; TIiG HANDY-
MAN OF CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED, 8372 Center Drive, La Mesa, California 9?041, Agent of certain
real property situated in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California, described
as Those portions of LoCS 3, 4 and 9, Townsend's Subdivision, partly in the City o£ Anaheim and
partly in the City of Garden Grove, as shown on a map thereof recar3ed in book 5, page 40, Mis-
cellaneous Maps, records of Orange County, described as follows: Beginning at the Southwest
corner of said Lot 3; thence along the Southerly line of said lot, North 89° 12' S4" East
901.34 feet to the true point of beginning; thence North 0° 47' 06" Weat 210 feet; thence North
89° 12' S4" East 27.44 feet; thence iVorth 0° 47' 06" West 207.86 feet; thence North S9° 12' S4"
East 125 feet; thence IZorth 0° 47' 06" 'vlest 242 L•eet to the Northerly line of said Lors 4 and 9;
thence North 89° 13' 30" East 267.56 feet to the NortheasC corner of said Lot 9; thence South
0° 55" 30" East along the Easterly line of said Lots 9 and 4, 659.81 feet to the Southerly line
o Lot 4; tt~ence South 89° 12' S4" Weat along the Southeriy line of said Lots 4 and 3. 421.61
feeC to the true point of beginning
; end
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did hold e public hearing at the City Hall in the City of Anaheim
on May 15, 1972, at 2:00 o'clock P.M., natice c,E seid public heacing heving been duly givea es requi:ed
by lew and in accordance with the provisions of the Anaheim Municipel Code, Chapter 18.68,to hear end consider
evidence fac and egainst said proposed variance and to investigete ard make findings and recommendations in connec-
iion therewith; end
WHEREAS, seid Commission, after due inspection, investigatlon, end study made by itself and in its behalf,
and aEter due consideration of all evidence and reports offeced at said hearing, does find and determine the fullowing
fects: '
1. That the petitioner requests a varience Erom the Aneheim INunicipel CodE ae follows:
SECTION 18.40.020 - Permitted uses (Activitiea required to be conducted within a
building; outdoor merchandise display area proposed)
2. That there are exceptionel or extraordinary circumstencas or conditions applicable to the property involved
or to the intended use of the property that do not apply generelly to the propecty or cless of use in the same vicinity
and ±one.
3. That the requested variance is necessary Eor the preservaGion and enjoyment of a subsCantiel p:operty rig~t
possessed by other pruperty in the seme vicinity and zone, end denied to the property in question.
4. That the requested varience will not be meteriaily detrimente: to the public welfare or injurious to the pcup-
erty or improvements in such vicinity and zone in which the pcopecty is located.
5. That the exiating drugstore/grocery on tlie same property was granted a similar waiver.
6. That the petitioner stipulated to construction of a two-foot high decorative mseonry
wall with planta to be displayed as e landscaped buffar behind sai.d well a~d that display of
all other merchandise would be behind the pYants and ~sould not be stacked to a height above
the plants.
7, That one peraon appeared in oppoeition.
V1-G -1-
~ ~
NOW, THEREFORE, BE 1T RESOLVEU thet the Aneheim City Plenning Commission does hereby grant subject
Petition for Varience, upon the following conditions which ere hereby found to be e necessary prerequisite to the pro-
posed use oE the subject pcopedy in order to pieserve the safety and generel welfare of the Citizens of the City of
Anaheim:
(1) That subject property shall be developed subatanCially in accordance with plans
and s~ecificationa on file with the City of Analieim marked Exhibit Nos. 1 and 2 provided,
however, that a two-foot high decorative masonry wall shall be constructed along the north-
erly perimeter of the proposed display area as sCipulated by the petitioner.
(2) That the plants shall be displayed behind the wall as a landacaged buffer and that
the display of all other merchandise shall be behind the plants and not be atacked to a height
ahove the plants as atipulated by the petition~er.
THE FOREGOING ~ESOLUTIPN is signed end eppmved by me thia 25th day of May, 1972.
O'~ 4Gt~O~
CHAIRMAN ANAHEIM CiTY PLANHING COMMISSION
ATTEST:
Li~/Y~'!~ ~~
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLAIdN1NG COMMISSION
STATE OF CALYFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) 88•
CTfY OF ANAHEIM ) ,
I, Ann Krebs, Secretary of the City Plenning Commission of the City oE Anaheim, do hereby certiEy that
the foregoing cesolution was passed and edopterl at a meeting of the City Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim,
held on May 15, 1972, et 2:00 o'clock P.M., by the following vote of the members theceof:
AyES: COMMISSIONERS: ALLRED, FARANO, GAUER, HERBST, KAYWOOD, ROWLAND, SEYMOUR.
NOES: COMMISSTONERS: NONE,
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE.
IN WITNESS R'HEREOF, I have hemento aet my hend this 2Sth day of May, 1972,
RESOLUTION N0. PC72-99
G! ~%JVrv 7a2t~e~
~
SECRETARY ANAFiEIM CI':'Y PLANtZING COMMISSION
V2-G -2-