PC 73-110RESOL?ri'ION N0. PC73-110
~
~
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM THAT GENERAL PLAN
AMENDMENT N0. 128 $E APPROVED
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Anaheim did adopt a General Plan by
Resolution No. 69R-644, showing the general description and extent of land uses within
the City and indicating the present belief of the Council as to possible future develop-
ment and redevelopment of land within the City; and
WHEREAS, in accordance with Section 65503 of the Government Code of the Stete
of California, a~edevelopment Element to the General Plan must be adopted by the City
Council prior to the adoption of a specific redevelopment project; and
WHEREAS, the City Planning Co~nisaion did hold a public hearing in the City
Hall in the City of 9nalieim on May 14, 1973, at 7:30 o'clock p.m., notice of sald public
hearing having been duly given as required by law and in accordance with th~ provisiona
of the Anaheim MuniciFal Code, to hear and conaider evidence for and againat said Amend-
ment to the General Plan, and make f.indings and reco~endationa in connection therewith;
and
WHEREAS, said Commission after due inspection, investigation and study g~ade
by itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of all evidence and reports
offPred at said hearing, DOES HEEtEBY FIND
1. That evidence was preaented at said hearing which substantiates the City
...... Pla~lning Commission's recoamiending to the City Council the eatablishment
of a Redevelopment Element to the General Plan.
2. That the Redevelopment Element has been prepared based upon certain envi•svn-
•manted~" deficiency criteria, such as: mixed land uses, inadequate lot
aizea, areas subject to flooding, aged structures, inadequate property
maintenance, insufficient publi= utilities, inadequate traffic aud pedes-
trian circulat3on, deficient and deadend atreets, impaired economic pro-
ductivity, and declining property values.
3. That the Redevelopment Element areas are depicted as being in two general
locations, one within the central portion of the city and the other being
located within the eaetecn portion of the city.
4. That a specific redevelopment project (Project "Alpha") has been recom-
mended by the Redevelopment Cormnission for adoption by the Anaheim Redevel-
opment Agency.
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FINDING:
That the Planning Commieaion, in connection with the filing of an Environmental
Impact Report, finds and determinea that the E.I.R. Resiew Committee's report
found the Report as being adequate as an informative document and followed the
City's established guldelines, and there would be no significant adverse enviton-
Lggntal ' impacts; and therefore, recommends to the City Council that said report
be adopted as the Council's Environmental Impact Statement.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Planning Commiasion of the City of
Anaheim does hereby recommend to the City Council of the City of Anaheim thet General Plan
Amendment No. 128 be approved as the CiCy's Redevelopment Element to the Genera7~ Plen on the
basis of the aforementioned findinga, and in accordance with Exhibit "A"'i
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is signed and approved by me this 24th day of May, 1973,
, . / ,/
~/'z'-n-~' `
CHAIRMAN PRO TEM ANAHEIM CITY LANNING COMMISSION
-1-
~J;T7 TT~T~ cc~»
?~1 i
CITY OF ANAHEIM
REDEVELQPMENT ELEMENT OF THE
ANAHEIM GENERAL PLAN
kay 1973
'Prepared By:
Development Services Department
Planning ~ivislon
`~
TABLE OF CONTENTS ~
PREFACE
9ACKGROUND
REDEVELOPMENT PROGRAM Z
REDEVELOPMENT PP,OJECT AREAS 4
PROJECT AREA DEFICIENCIES 5
OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES ~
LAND USE AND DESIGN CRITERIA $
IMPLEMENTATION TECHNIQUES 8
~REFACE
The physical development of Anaheim has occurred to meet certain community
needs and values. In the coursc of time, events and changing developments are
creati~g different sets of needs and values. This continuous process leaves
portions of the older community too expensive for the owners to maintain and
for the community to provide required community services. This oftentimes leads
to deterioratin9 structures, vacancies and inadequate services which, in turn,
may cause social and economic problems for the community. The post-industrial
gro~.vth era broughC rapid expansion of commercial and residential structures,
v~hose remains the comm~nity has inherited. These structures are too expensive
to remove but stcadily deteriorate the putential value of the property they
encumber. Tf~is causes a diminishing tax base and increasing service costs for
the area at thc same cime.
Commercial and residential structu~as especially in the Jowntown area, iahich
, havc: served the city well for many years are now becoming obsolete because the
necessary repairs and/or remodeling are considered too expensive to be worth-
while. Although informal discussions of these problems has gone on for the past
fe~i years and sporadic aLtempts to improve conditions have been made, it is
becoming evident that some kind of organized physical redevelopment activity
may be necessary if the obsolete areas of the city are to grow and prosper.
BACKGROUND
The failure of downtown Anaheim (center city) to respond to the vigorous
growth of the resC of the city has long been a cause of concern among do~•mtown
merchants, and citizens groups. Ge~erally the efforts of L•hie Chamber of Lommerr,e
have contributed to the present status of community interest in '.~s problem. It
has long been reco9nized that changing conditions throughou: the city couid
' create physical and economic problems, and, in 196~ a comprehensive city-wide
analysis was undertaken in order to identify the contributing factors.
-z-
In January 1961 the City Louncil requested informa:ion relative to Federal
and State Redevelooment Laws. This was followed by Council resolution finding
~ the need for a Redevelopment Agency and declaring the Anaheim City Council in
June t96t to be that Agency. This action was taken to.determine the existence
of blighted conditions within the meaning of the California Laws and to assess
the need for redevelopment in Anaheim. Also in 19b~ the Anaheim City Louncil
created a ~itizens Advisory Co~r.ittee. This committee was assigned the tas~ of
cond~cting a thorough analysis of the entire city to de'termine the necessity and
desirability of a local red~~:^lapment project. The City Council, in its
instructions to the Lommittee, emphasized the need ror a complete city-wide
examination.
During the next few years the Advisory Committee spent its time formulating
a community analysis program consisting of several elements. Identification of
all deteriorati~g areas, determination of the degree of deterioration, and
determination of the type of action necessary to correct undesirable situations.
• Fprtions af this analysis wer~e accomplished by private planning consultants, how-
~veP, much of the data necessary was supplied by City planning staff.
It should be noted that the work of the Advisory Committee and city staff
has been largely one of research, over the past 10 years. However, the results
have paid off and in 1971 the Anaheim Redevelopment Agency reorganized the
Advisory Committae and created the Anaheim Community Redevelopment Commission.
In addition the City Council and the Redevelopment Agency in June of 1972
designated the entire City of A~aheim as a redevelopment "survey area"
REDEVELOPMENT PROGRAM •
In order to cope viith the problems of physical deterioration and blight,
-3-
environmental as well as structural, and to implement the recommendations as
a result of past studies and work sessions, the Anaheim Redevelopment Agency
established the Community Redevelupmer.t ~ommission. The Agency requested the
preparation of a comprehensive Redevelopment Plan for the City of Anaheim
thereby providing a frame of referenca to evaluate problem areas and develop
a concerted plan of action related to the new set of needs for today as ~aell
as tomorrow. Included in thi~ plan is the Red.~velopment Program which estab-
lishes the specific plans and policies which the city undertakes to rehabilitate
geographic areas which have special ~roblems or needs. These Redevelopment
Program includes~
. Consrrvation programs to protect and maintain existi7g areas and
neighborhoods
. Rehabilitation programs to repair and upgrade existing areas and
neighborhoods with minor problems. This includes public investment
and programs to encourage owner improvements and maintena~ce.
~ . Redevelopment projects and programs to clear and redevelop deteri-
orated ereas and neighborhoods with serious structural problems.
The Redevelopment Commission in their efforts have recognized that 'edevelop-
ment can minimize the physical and social problems in deteriorated areas, and
that the potential taxable value of improved land can reimburse the city for any
initial pro;ect losses such as costs o` ac~uisition, clearance, and dispusa!
of the land.
The Commission al.so recognized Chat a redevelopment project can revitalize
residential areas or downtowr. areas with improved *_raffic circulation. The
downtown area can become a pleasant shopping and cultural environment where
people are more important than ~utomobiles and trees and green open s?aces are ,
-4-
more important than parking spaces. Redevelopment can provide the c~mmunity
with needed business and industrial sites, green open space, parks and oth~.
community facilities where today only deteriorated areas stand idle and misused.
The Redevelopment Commission in conjunction with the Anaheim City Planning
Commission should evaluate the need and extent of areas requiring conservation,
rehabilitation and redevelopment in conformance with the related elements of
the Anaheim General Plan. In addition, neighborhood associations, property
owners and citizens groups may organize to aid in the pre~aration of detailed
studies of the problems and nPeds of the area, and to initiate community action
programs to promote and effect the redevelopment required.
The Redevelopment Commission felt that in this manner of systematic planning
of redevelopment projects, the City of Anaheim can accomplish the established
goals and standards., These value-related decisions require the involvement of
all its citizens and groups in determining what kind of city is desired for
tomorrow.
REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREAS
The comprehensive Redevelopment Element for the City of Anaheim is made up
and includes areas that are in need of some sort of redevelopment treatment.
The redevelopment areas as depicted in the element are situated in two general
locations. Area one is located generally within the center of the city, with
boundaries axtending approximately from La Palma Avenue on the north, Santa Ana
Freeway on the west, Ball Road and Vermont Avenue on the south, and East Street
on the easC. Area two is located east of Area One~with boundaries generally
along Orangethorpe Avenue on the north, the Orange Freeway on the west, Santa
Ana River on the south and IJeir Canyon Road on the east. (Exhibit A shows the
general locations.)
-5-
PROJECT AREA DEFILIENCIES
The Redevelopment Element has been prepared based upon certain enviran-
mental deficiency criteria. These inciude: •
. Mixed land uses,
. Inadequate lot sizes,
. Areas subject to flooding,
. Aged structures,
. Inadequate property maintenance,
, Insuff?cient public utilities,
. Inadequate traffic and pedestrian circ~lation,
, Deficient and deadend streets,
. Impaired economic productivity,
. Declining property values. ~
Within the eastern portion of the proposed redevelopment area, which is
' designated as 9eneral industrial in the land use elemenY, there are currently
' scattered non-conforming uses such as oider single family dwellings and various
commercial activities such as bars and restaurants. Traffic circulation in that
portion of the redevelopment area is generally good. However, several streets may
need to be realigr.ed, widened, added or others vacated in order to improve local
' traffic circulation as well as to facilitate improved land parcelization of
land locked areas. In addition, railroad grade separations should be improved
to expedite the movement of traffic and provide industrial sites with railroad
spurs. Facilities ~nd services such as storm drainage, water, sewer lines and
fire and police protection will be studied ar,~ recortmendationsas eo additional
facilities will be made.
-6-
The center city redevPlopment proJect area is comprised primarily of :he
typical downtown retail, offices and governmental offices. The area includes
' limited industrial land uses and scattered residential dwelling units. The
entire area including the downtown is typical of an aging neighborhood and
many of the structures are among the oldest in the cortmunity. Although well
maintained, and still functional, numerous structures and of substandard masonry
and brick construction. Others are unsightly in appearante are are inadequate
to serve the needs of a modern downtown area as the increasing number of vacancies
will indicate. Only a few structures in the entire area exceed two stories and
the tallest structure is six stor;es.
In spite of some notable examples of good design and architecture, aesthetic
values in the redevelopment area ere generally lacking and in need of consider-
able imprcvement. Railroad ~racks bisecting the area prPsent an unkempt and
~ unsightly appearance. Overhead wires, billboards s:~d signs all add to the
. general poor appearance throughout the area.
The area is fur~her characterized with the typical gridiron pattern of
streets with uniform blocks ranging from approximately 3 to 5 acres. Although
the grid system facilitates traffic movement throughout the redevelopment area,
many of the streets are narrow. In analyzing the street pattern it may become
necessary and desirable through the redevelopment process to vacate certain
streets in order to achieve the certain objectives of the redevelopment planning.
Additional interchanges with the freeway system may Se necessary and desirable
to provide access, linking center c,ity to the commercial-t•ecreation area.
-6-
7he center city redevelopment project area is comprised primarily of the
typical down~own retail, offices and governmentzl offices. Th~ area includes
limited industrial land uses and scattered residential dwelling units. The
entire area including the downtown is typical of an aging neighborhood and
many of the structures are among the oldest in the cortmunity. Although well
maintained, and still functional, numerous str~~ctures and of substandard masonry
and brick construction. Others are unsightly in appearance are are inadequate .
to serve the needs of a modern downtoam area as the increasing number of vacancies
will indicate. Only a few structures in the entire area exceed two stories and
the tallest structure is six stories.
In spite of some notable examples of good design and architecture, aesthetic
values in the redevelopme~t area a,re generally lacking and in need of consic.er-
able improvement. Railroad tracks bisecting the area present an unkempt and
~ unsightly appearance. Overhead wires, billboards and signs all add to the
• general poor appear•ance throughout the area.
The arsa is further .haracterized with the typical gridiron pattern of
streetis with uniform blocks ranging from approximately 3:0 5 acres. Although
the grid system facilitates traffic movement throughout the redevelopment area,
many of the streets are narrow. In analyzing the street pattern it may become
necessary and desirable through the redevelopment process to vacate certain
streets in order to achieve the certain objectives of the redevelopment planning.
Additional interchanges with the freeway system may be necessary and desirable
to provide access, linking center city to the commercial-recreatian area.
- 7 •-
OBJECTIVES AND PO U CIES
The following general objectives and policies are proposed to achieve
~edevelopment within a desi9nated project area:
. Elimination and prevention of spreading deterioration and blighted
corditions,
, Conservation, rehabilitation and redevelopment of ar;as to the extent
permitted by state and local la~as,
, The removal of structurally substandard bui7dings to allow improved
economic uses to be constructed,
. The elimination of environmental problems s~ch as
obsolete street patterns and small and odd-shaped lots which prevent
proper utilization of land,~
. The assembly of land into reasonably sized and shaped parcels to
facilitate land disposition and development,
~ . Provisions of adequate public facilities including street improvement,
• underpasses, storm drains, sewer and water lines, underground utilities,
street lighting, traffic controls, street trees and other facilities
neczssary to provide the area with improved appearances,
. The provision of additional land or new sites to accommodate expansion of
existing busir~esses and industry,
, The elimination of nonconforrr~(ng, incpmpatible or obnoxious land uses,
, The expansion of industrial.`land thereby creating additional employment
opportunities in the C~ity of Anaheim,
. Establishment of land use and design criteria for specific projects.
-8-
LAND USE AND DESIGN CRITFRIA
' The following general '.and use.and design objectives should be considered
. and included within all specific redevelopment projects in order to achieve
the highest possible levels of development. One oT the main factors leading
to obsolescence and blight has been an obvious lack of concern for the visual
amenities that make most areas liveable as well as conducive of doing business.
Industry is no lor.ger considered as an unwanted land use with todays modern
architectural excellence and sound design techniques. Downtown areas no longer
have to consist of unrelated and incompatible mixed land uses which tend to
fragment the area ~nd reduce the efficiency of the various land uses. It is,
therefore, recommended that the Redevelopment Agency include land use and
design criteria as follows:
. To provide a maximum of usable open space,
, To achieve compatibility between the new and the old by reviewing
. all plans for new construction,
. To provide for the safe and afficient movement of pedestrian and
vehic~lar traffic,
. To achieve compatibility ~f land uses by controlling the inter-mixing
of industrial, commercial and residential development on the basis of
sound land use planning principles as outlined in the General Plan
Land Use Element. ~
IMPLEMENTATION TECHNIQUES
In order to adequately imptement the above obJectives and policies, the
Redevelopment Commission and the Redevelopment Agency may wish to consider
the following where aF ~priate:
-9-
, The acquisition and assembly of real property for public and private
, use~
• , The demolition and removal of structures and improvement-items that are
beyond the stage of repair or are of a detrimer~tal~environm~nt influ~nce,
. The provision of relocation assistance to any di~~-Saaed residential
and non-residential occupants affected by prv;ject iKpravements,
The installation, construction or reconstruction of str.~at~, utftities, '
landscaping, on- and off-site improvements and other neoessary ~~b3ic
facilities.
The rehabilitation and improvement of exist4~; sti'actures.
/ 2 3 4 5 6 7
AA
A
8
~oPoC
i ~,:v~a
~M. ~
F
;°;.'
"~aa~
;~;~~
4r.~
°;.~
C~
4~ :~ E~ Er ±~ ~~
8 9 !0 ll 12 13 14 !5 16 !7 f 8 l9 20 2! 22 23 29 25 26 27 28 29 30 3/ 32 33 39
I~ ~
"
~ ~ ~z ~° - ~._~~~ ' ' ---~ --
Wd ~$ ah W~ ~~ ~ 1 . i~;
cnqn.Mr. ' ~,~ ~'~
r I_
1
'- ~
~ ' ~
..
.,
;
,
- ~ ~l
. .
~ . _
';
'~r .
i
-
k
~ ,
u ~~
• ..
~
~
~r , ~ c .,r 'r
1?
'
,_.;
~ ~ i ~ '_'-^: ----
S-~,, ~~
_ , a.
~ ~~ i~ i'~~ -~- ./,
i t t:t'y~, .
' ~r i;a
~ ~, r
~ ' ~ I
~
..,.
• ~~ ....
. ..
+ ~ ~
i
~ .
;
~~'
~ . _
1 . _
~ _
~
~
., *
. ~ ~
' ° .
~.~ ,.
. . :,
~
t.
~ ~ . '--.. ,
~ '
i: ~ .: r
t . i
-.
~ : r
. ,.
•
1
~
~ A~
~ ,.. .
„ ~; - i
`
~
~
~ ~
,~ .. 't ~
,
. ._.~
~
...
~-r,u
_.._.
....~
~
.
~
, ...
'
..
_
j.h
"ir
-
_
I'
e
~ ~1
.
:
,
~ ~ '
•'~
}
{.~ c~snnna
~
.
:
1
' :" ~ i
~ ~„1' ~ ~' i, .
: ~ ,..c , i
~ .
~
'~1~ ~ ytie,,'1
.
'
~'i
`~~~
~ .~..
1. I~
~~
; .
~ .. ,.. ,.. , ~,. •
,
~
"^ ~V ,
.
,
.
:
~
~ .;.
.-.
L 1_ e
~~ :~h . ~yl~~' ,
.
..
~
_
~1 ~,
~'.~I
-~~~~ ~
~ ~
f~< < ~~. .:?~.,
~ ~
~; ~ ~ t `f ~~
,t ~ I '~ 'Llyr~ ~In
~~~ ~t~ ~ ~ 1~
~ .
•~
'
'+ Jt
i
;~ ~
~ r
L J 4
~
~
~
' r
`` a ~~
~
,
~ t ;
~ ~ ~.
~ k ;
"; , ,.,
~
,! i
~~ L -~ ~~ t ,~
,
~
' ~' ~
~
~ r «• ~ ~ ' ~
: ',
- ~~ ~ ,
~ ...
'
'
~ j
,
a
r~ f p~ I a e.w w~ `s
~ ~yr 7 , .t ~
~
~ ~ ~ `
'
; G4 ~
-
; i ~~ r, ti~ ~
~ ~
~ ~'~ ~
~
~
~
,;~.--.
y
..I ~
~~4 1 ~~~
.Y
~r.
' ~~
I ~
.:
~ ~ ~~,
t
~ I ~ ~~ ~
~,h --
~
.~ ~'
~ 1~ ~
.~
r
4 F_
y.. 3 .;. ,a~
.~
~
~ ~~~
~ , ~ ; ~~-~ ~ ~ ~
;~~
,,~.~. ~. ~ 1
rr~ ~ . I ~ ~H" IIV ` . ' ~Y+ f ' , ~Ci `~,'~ Y
''~ ~~r. '~ 1' ~ ~~ bil ~ ~. p Y )
1 ~ ./
p
'
'
'
N
-
`i I
~
•
` 1 ~_
~,~
uyC:.~+.. 'm14 ~ ~ ~
f
r ~•
. ~ ?
~Lt. ,
_;
~ 1 'i .~ 1 1 ~ ~ ~ ~~N
"
~
~ IF ~ ~~~4J
~.1a:f
~ '
~ i
. ~~
'~
~ ~: ~
~` ~.. y ~. ~. ~.Ya
~ r!d I~
~ .j ~ ~~ f f
4
~ ~ ~
.
,.-~ ..1~ ~ ~
. ' , ~ I.l ~. ..
. 4 ~
'`'l, ~
~. _
~' \ ~ ~1 '. { ~ ~ ~S: ~ I e.' ~~ µµ-. 'i
~
°t ~
~,
'
I
~~ ~ ~
~, ~„
'T'
,.
~
.;_~1
•
~~ ~
, '
I
'
'. ti.
~
i ~!
~r., '
~
i
'l~
f ~ ' ~
,
~
( ~
~
~
::1 I
'-k `i~
~
~
; ,
~ ~
~'i~f ~~'',~~
~~ ,
~i
~
~;~,~r r ~ .{
I
y~ '~~)~r ~ 7~,' ~ I. , ~ ~L
`' ~ ly. 4 1~~~ ~ I . ' W
.k~a,:t "" , ` ~ ~ l'L -~ ~J~ ~ ~~!,~~,~,~ ~
~~, ~~ - I , ~~ ;~,' i~ ~~0' : ~~ ''~-.~'",.'~ •
i~~ ,t i ~ ` .na s` ~' e „7' ~ r /
r 14 t I /
a~ :~~ ~r~, , ~ ~'' ,r ~ ~- _,~ 4,~
rr
~
r
`
~f~
r
' ,
/
IC~ r ,. .
~
~
"~
yl~lpLYr
1 ~ ~
.
~ '
~ ' J ,. iJ '~~~,.
~ ,..
,
F ` ~~
1~
,
4
~.i.:
I ~
~.
1
1
I
~ V
' ~
~
~ -
i i
~' - ~ '
~
~
J
I
• ~ ~ r. ~ ~ 'Yj a
,
4 ' ~ P i S I I $ Q I~~
,., M
~
~ ' ~ ~ ;
~ G
:
. I
~
4• ~
~
._ ~ ~.,~-
I
~ ~' y,
•1
,
..
~~~: ,
,
„ ~
.
~; ~ , ~
I
I ~ ~
~ `
~~~' ~
, y
,
,
I~ y ,~
~
J ~' ,~ ~ Y
r F
~-~` ~ l
` '
~
~
~a
~;.
~
~
~.__.:...
~ ~.':
'
_-
~.\
~ '~
~~ ~
I
r k
I .
~?
~
'
'
~
~ ~' i
°
I+
I . ~~
,,,_r___-_
- ~~ ~ ~~~
~;~ ~
; '
~ ~ ' ~
~ ~ ~;. . " t
~ ,,,~ ~y J ;ti~
I ~
x ~;~ , I ~ ~
.
7..C '~
! M
i~
I
~ '•"T
J
~t \
+
~(.
i ~~ 1~
i
a.
,0 1
.~ . .
'.
TT
I ~. .
~1 n~~ ~
T
[I
'
~'i r
° r
I~~ l~ P.
Y ~~ ,~.Frt_I
~ •
l
~ •r ^
,./ f~t:
-0~
i wu4"
, 1 ~ r'. , , ~.
I ~~j~ (hl~If~ A : .f ~.
~ ~r pl~r ~ .;~ ~~.
-~
~ ,~ ~ ~ ~ r~„~. L ~;
; ~r --
1 ~ I ~ ""
~;~ ~ ~
' "~ ~
~~,,
„
,~
• ~.
LJ Fl
~
i
I ~ ~
r `
~ ., ,, ~ ,
i...
r ~
~ ,
~
I ~ I
nl,:_ ~ ~i. . ~ S~S~~ ~~ ~. ;
~
~ .
__ "' .,.
~ .. ~
\ y.. ..
I t ~ `
W l . /44P
t' t " ' l..I~7. '!
~¢ l'..~
'I
'
~ ~ - 4 ~ r , ~ i
~ ,~ r ~
.
,
I
~ ~ ~,'~' . y t~„
~ ~ .r , ~ ~ ~
i
~ ~
,
~
~< ~ ..
1
' ~ '' ~
~
, ';t~
;
~
~~^~ ~I~
, ~'
~
,
~ ~
-
-J ~ ,. ~
~,
( r~.•.
~ r~
' ` ` ~
~ 1
~
'L
~~~' ti ,
,
,;;~ ili
::~,
.~ _„it ~ •4 ~ ~~ + ,~ ~. I ~ ~
.
.
. i
~ .
_I „2 ~
, .. ~
.
-
, ~
~ ~.~
~
~ , ~
', .'~
~~'.t ~
~
r
. .
....
' ~ . y... '.. ~~
~.
r4
[
i
~ '
^ - \
~
~ ~~ ~
. .
...__
_. . I_. . ..
1 .~ ~
... _
~ ,
~~~ i
: ~
~ ~
..
_L ._._.~__~.~ ,
~
,p o
w
w Y
T
. . .. . ~~ ~ .
~-+~
_ ~ ""_-.~
~„~ a, ~,~„
Enhibit A
PROPOSEO REDEVELOPMENT STUDY AREAS
I~ Primory Selected Areus
~ Secondary Selected Arees
N
~
~
~
MAP Oi'
CITY f~F ANAHEIM
I • 2 3 p 4 5 g 6 • 7~; B 9 p~ 10 Il ; l2 ~4 /3 l4 l5 ~~` l6 /7 18 l9 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 2B 29 30 3l 32 33
ii 'F ~! ~~ 4i ~' ~: ~~ ~. 4~ Y~ ~~
, -• . .
ATTF.ST:
~
~
~
~
~~~2~~L~ ~~~~~~~
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNINu COhAlISSI9N
STATE OF CALIFORNtA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, Ann Krebs, Secretary of the City Planning Co~isaion of the City of Anaheim, do hereby
certify that the foregoing reaolution was passe~ and adopted at a meeting of the City Plan-
ning Commission of the City of Anaheim held on May 14, 1973, at 7:30 o'clock p.m., by the
follciring vote of the members thereof:
AYES: CON@1ISSIONERS: A~E9, PARANO, NFRBST, GAUER, KAYWOOD, ROWLAND.
NOES: COI~IISSIONERS: NONE.
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: SEYMOUR~ ~~u~
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 24th day of May, 1973.
~~ ~~i~ %~~ w~'.'_'
SECRETARY ANAHEL~i~CITY PLANNING C0~4SISSION
RESOLUTION N0. PC73-110 "2"