PC 73-120t,: -- ~~
~ ~
RESOLUTION NO. PC73-120
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
THAT PETITION FOR VARIANCE NO. 2514 HE GRANTED
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission of the City of Aneheim did receive e verified Petition Eor Vertence
from UNIOIQ DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, 8555 Artesia Boulevard, Rellfiower, California 90706,
Owner;• ~IEW BRITTANY, INCORPORATED, 16911 Sellf7.~wer Boulevard, Bellflower, California
90706, Agent of certain real property situated in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange,
State of California described as Lot 189 of Tract No, 1098 as per map recorded in book
39, page 2, Miscellaneous Mepa, in the office oF the Couaty Recorder of said Orange County
•,
•• ; end
WHEREAS, thc City Plenning Commission did hold e public heering et the City Heil in the City of Aneheim
on May 30, 1973, at 2:00 o'clock P.M., notice of seid public hearing heving been duly given es requiced
by lew end in eccordence with the provisions of the Anehcim Municipel Code, Chepter 10.68,to heer and cansider
evidence for and ugainst seid proposed varience end to investigete and meke findings and recommendetions in conaec-
tlon therewith; and
WHEREAS, said Commissior., efter due inspection, investlgetion, end study mede by itself end in lts behelf,
and afier due conslderation oE all evldence and reports offeced et said heering, does Eind a~d determine thefollowing
facts: ~
1. Thet the petitioner reauests varianoes Yrom the Anaheim Munioipal Code as follows:
a. SECTION 18.24.030(4)(&) - ~~inimt~m ~ot widtFi: (70 feet required; 55 feet
proposed)
~b. SECTION 18.24.030(4)(e) - Minimum lot area. (7200 squere feet required;
6739 and 7018 square feet proposed)
2. That th~ petitioner proposes to ~ubdivide subjea•t property into two R-1 Zoned lots.
g,. That there ere exceptionel or extraordlnery circumstances or conditions applicable to the propetty involved
or to the intended use of the properly that do not epply genera9#y to the property or class ot use in the same vicinity
end zone.
4 Thet the requested verIonce is necessery for the prRServatlon and cnjoyment of e substentiel property right
possessed by other property in the same viclnity and zon+c,'end denied to thE ptaperty in questlon.
5, That the requested vorience will not be materlally detrimental to the public welfete ot injucious to the prop-
erty or tmprovements 1n such vicinity end zone in which ihe pcop&rty is .located.
ENVRIONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FINDING:
That the P1Rnning Commission, in oonneotion with an Exemption D6olaration Status request, finds
and determines that the proposal would have no signiP.ioant environmental impaot and, therefore,
recommends to the City Counoil the,t no Environmental Impeat Stetement is aeoessary.
V 1-G -1-
'~ NOIV, THEREFOF.E, BE IT RE~VED that the Anehaim City Planning Co~slon does hereby grant subject
Petition for Veriance, upon the following conditiona which ere he:aby Eound to be e necessary prerequisite to the pro-
posed use of the subject property in order to gresecve the seEety end genecal welEete ofthe Cittzens oEthe City of
Anaheim:
(1) That the side~valks and drivebYays shall be installed along Thornton-Avenue and,~
Brady Avenue as required by the City Engineer and in aocordanoe with standard plans and
speciYioations on file in the offiae of the City Engineer.
(2) That the owner(s) of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the sum of
602 per froiit foot along Thornton Avenue and Brady Avenue Yor tree planting purposes.
(3) That a parcel map to reaord the approved division of sub3eot property be submi~ted
to and'approved by the City of Anaheim and then be reoorded in the oPfioe of the Orenge County
Hecordar. '
(4) That the owner(s) of subjeat property shall pey to the City oY Anaheim the appro-
priate park and reoreation in-lieu fees as determined to be appropriate by the City Council,
said fees to be paid at the time the building permit is issued.
(5) Thet Condition Nos. 2 and 3, above mentioned, sliall be aomplied with prior to the
aommencement of tha activity auttiorized under this resolution, or prior to the time that the
building permit is issued, or within s period of one yeer Yrom date hereof, whiohever ooours
first, or suah further time as the Planning Commission may grant.
(6) That sub~eot property shall be developed substantially iri conformanoe with plans
and speoifioations on file with the City of Anaheim, marked Exhibit Nos. 1, 2, 3, and 4.
(7) That Conditiozi Nos. 1 end 6 above mentioned, shall be oomplied with prior to
final building and zoning inspecticns.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION ls signed ead eppmved by m•-
ATTEST:
~,~~~~
SECRETARY ANAHEiM CITY PLp idNING COMMISSION
STATE OF CALiFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) 88~
CTfY OF ANAHEIM ) ;
I Ann Krebs Secretery of the Ci4y Ylenning CommiRSion oE t;~e City of Aneheim, do he;eby certify thet
the focegoing resolution wos passed end adopteci nt a meetlng oE the City Plenning Commission of the City of Anehelm,
held on Mfly 30, 1973 ~ et 2:00 o'clock P.M., by the following vote oI the manbers checeof:
AYGS: COMMISSIONERS: ALLRED, FARANO, GAUER, HERBST, KA`IIAOOD, SEl(~OUR.
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE.
ASSENT: COMMISSIONERS: F.OINLAND.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I heve heceunto set my hand this 7th day of June, 1973.
RESOLUTfON N0. PC73-~20
_,_--%~~"w`~`
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
V2-G '2~