PC 73-129~ ~ ~
RESOLUTION N0, pC73-129
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSI~N OF 1405CITY OF ANAHEIM
THAT PETITION FOR CQNDITIONAL USE,PERMIT NO. BE GRANTED
WHEREAS, the.City Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim did ceceive a verified Petition For Conditional
Use Permitfrom CHRIST AND DOROTHY MANES, 1418 West La Palma Aveaue, Anaheim, California 92801,
Owners; ROSE MOHR, 423 South Brookhurst Street, Anaheim, California 9280i, A~ent of certain
real oroperty situated in the City of Ansheim, County of Orange, State of California, des-
crihed as Lot 103 of Tract No. 2161, as per map recorded in Book 63, Pages 33, 34 and 35,
Miscellaneous Maps, in the office of the County Recorder of said county
; and
WHEREAS, the City, Planning Commission did hold a public heacing at the City Hall in the City of Aneheim on
June 11, 1973, at 2:00 o'clock P.M., notice oE said public hearing having been duly given as required by
law and in accordance with the provisions of the Anaheirt~ Municipal code, Chapter 18.64, to heac and consider evidence
for and agair.st said proposed conditional use and to investigate and make findings and :ecommendations in connection
therewith; and
WHEREAS, said Commission, after due inspection, i~~vestigation, end study mede by itself and in its behalf, and
after due consideration of all evidence and ceperts offered at said hearing, does Eind and detecmine tlie following facts:
1. That the proposed use is pcoperly one far which a Conditional Use Permit is authorized by COde Section
18.64.020(2-b) tu wit: establish a board and care home for a maximum of seven (7) residents.
2. That the pcoposed use will not advecsely eEfect. the adjaining land uses end the growth end development of
the area in which it is proposed to be located.
3. That the size and shape of the site proposed fot the use is edequate to ellow the Eull decelopment oE the
proposed use in a manner noi detrimental to the particular erea noc to the peace, health, safety, and general v.~elfHre of
the Citiz>ns ofthe City of Aneheim.
4. That the gronting of the Conditional Use Pecmit nnder the conditions imposed, if nny, will not be detrimental
to the peace, health, safety, and general welfare oE uestsl e s o~fehee iittedaand any proposal Co have addi-
5. That a maximum of five (5) g y P
tional guests will require approval by the Planning Commisaion.
6. That if morE than six guects are allowed to reside on the premises, all buildings
used for residence by the guests wi7.1 rec_uire autorantic sprinkler system~.
EN~IIRONMENTAL ~IPACT REPORT FINDING:
That the Planning Cou¢nission, in connection with an Exemptiun Declaration Status Request,
finds and determines that the proposal ivould have no signi.f•icant environmental imp~ct and,
therefore, reco~eends to the City Counc.il that no EnvironmentaZ Ir~pact Statement is necessary.
Cl-G ~ 1
..^ ~ ~
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Aneheim City Plenning Commiss;on Etr.~ fe~eby grant sub~ect
Petition for Conditionel Use Permit, upon the following conditlons whlch ere hereby found !o ~~- a necessary preceqi!',alte
4o the proposed use of the subject praperty in order to presecve the seEety anG gtnerel ueifura+,fkhe Citlzena af the
City of Anaheim:
(2) That the owner(s) of sub~ecC pro~erty ~hell dewd to Clie Ciky of Anahein ~ s'trip
of land 53 feet in width from Che centerlinc af Ehb ~Eree~ aion~;:~a Palma Avenue £or st:ec~%
wideitl.rrg ~urpases.
(2) T:±~r: th?- ~ani2~(sj i~f eu~js~z ;;:r~,yer~f :sh~!l pay Co the Ci`.• of >'; `::.ce,im the sum of-
$2.00 per E'i6}ti_ h~3~L altr.g ::a i~2:!~6 f~~Pe~t.rF, ,c,q,, ~tret~g: ?~a;hting puryc'i.:::s.
(3) T!:aE the existing structure shal'1 'o€ ~iicu~h~ ~:;(i ~r~3 chqr, ;~inibur, zctmn3aru~ oF ~he
I'ire Code as adopted by ths Citp ~£ Aneheim~
(4) That trash storage areas sha11 be provi3ed in ~ccordance ;~~:>:.": ap;~rove3 ~tlana u:r .
file with the office of the Director of PuLlic Works.
(5) That al1 air conditioning facilities shall be properly shielisted f.rom v,:4,rr;,
(6) That subject property shall be developed substantially in accordance with plans
and speciEications on file with the City of Anaheim marked Eahibit Nos. 1 a:~d 2.
(7) That Condition Nos, x, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6,'above mentioned, shall be cota~lied with
prior to the commencement of the activity authorized under Chis resolution, or prior to ehe
time that the building permit is •lssued or within a pariod of one year from date hereof,
whichever occurs first, ~r such further time.as the Pianning Covm~ission may grant.
(8) That a maximum of five (5) guests shall be permitced under the proposed use.
THE FOREGOIN. '~SOLUTION is signed end epproved by me this 21st day o~e, 1973. ^/
I i~ ~
ANAHEIM C1TY
ATTEST: I ~
__ /
--~ ;;
%i.`~'/!/Yt~c~Z~! Pi~i"~/
SECRETARY ANAHEIfN CITY PLANNING COMMISSIO\
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, Ann Krebs, Secretary of the City Plenning Commission oE the City of Anaheim, do hemby certif~ ^ rt
the Eoregoing cesolution was pessed and adopted at a meeting of the City Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim,
held on June 11, 1973, et 2:00 o'clock P.M., by the following vote of the members thereof:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: ALLRED, GAUER, Fi~R:,~~T, KP.ICWOOD, ROWLAND, SEYMOUR,
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE.
AE~cNT: COMMISSIONERS: FARANO.
II3 WITNESS WHEREOF, I have heceunto set my hend this 21st day of June, 1973.
RESOLUTION N0. PC73-129
;,~~~
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING C('~MMISSION
C~G " 2'