PC 73-132RESOL~N NU. pC73-132
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
THAT PETITION FOR VARIANCE N0. 2518 BE GRANTED II~ PART
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission of the City of Anahcim did receive a verified Petition for Variar.r,e from
FELIX AND EiENA AHUMADA, 874 Redondo Drive East, Anaheim, California 92801 and pHILIP
AND DOLORES MURROW, 870 Redondo Drive East, Anaheim, CalifA ent ofacertain real prop-
SANDS, 874 Redondo Drive East, Anaheim, California 92801, g
erty situated in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California, described
as Lots 15 and 16, of Tract 1460; as per map recordQd in boolc 46, pages'2 and 3 of Mis-
ce4laneous Maps, records:o.f Urange County, Califarnia
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at the City Hall in the City of Anaheim on
June lI, 1973, at 2:00 o'clock p.m., notice of said public hearing having been duly given as required by law and
in accordance with the provisions of the Maheim Municipal Code, Chapter 18.68, to hear and consider evidence for and against said
proposed variance and to investigate and make findings a~id recommendations in co~mection therewith; and
WHEREAS, said Commission, aCter due Enspection, investigation, and study made by itseif and in its behalf, and after duc
consideration of all evidence and reports offered at said hearing, does find and determine the following facts:
variances
1. That thc petitioner requests : from the.Anaheim Municipal Code: as follows; in 4rder to subdivide
two existing lots into three Yots:
Portion A
a. SECTION 18.28.030(2)(ay - Minimum side yard. (10 feet required; 6 feet
proposed)
b. SECTION 38.20.030(3)(a) - Minimum rear yard. (2_feet required; 22 fee*
` proposed)
c. SECTTON 18.20.030(4)(d)(1)_ - Minimum ~ronnd..flonr•ar~a... (2000 square feet
required; 1700 aquare feet propoaed)
Portion B
d. SECTION Z8.~20.030(4)(a) - Minimnm lot area. (10 000 square feet required;
9200 square feet proposed)
2. That the petitioner withdrew Waivera 1-a and 1-b, above mentioned, and stipulated
to complying with code required aide and rear yard setbacks.
3. That subjecC peti.tion for waiver of the minimum ground floor areaetitioner~wes
and minimum loC s9.ze on Portion B is hereby granCed on the basis Chat the p
attempting to resolve a difficult aubdivision ~robleta of two lots, a part of which was
not now being used, and similar waivera have been granted on ad~acent property.
4. That there are excepl:ional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions appli~
cable to tre property involved or Co the intended uae of the property that do not apply
generally to the property cr class of use in the eame vicinity and zone. `~
5. That the requested veriance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of
a substantial property ri~ht posaessed by other property in the same vicinity and zone, .
and denied to the property in question.
6, That the regitested variance will noC be maCerially detrimental to the public
welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in such vicinity and zone in which
the property is located.
-1-
DEV-66-E
~ ~ ~
ENVIRONfIENTAL L*iPACT REPORT FINDING:
That the Planning Commission, in connection with an Exemption Declaration Status request,
finds and determines that the proposal would have no significant environmental impact and,
therefore, recommends to the City Council that no Environmental Impact Statement is necessary.
NOW~,~ THE FORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning Coffinission does hereby
grant/su~~jec~Petition for Va=iance, upon the following conditions which are hereby found
to be a necessary prerequisite to the proposed use of the subject property in order to pre-
serve the safety znd general welfare of the Citizens of the City of Anaheim:
(1) That a parcel map to record the approved division of subject property be submitted
to and approved by the City o£ Anaheim and then be recorded in the office of the Orange
Co+ir.ty Recorder prior to the issuance of a building permit.
(2; That subject propertq shall be served by underground utilities.
(3) That the rn~mer(s) of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the appro-
priate park and recreation in-lieu fees as determined to be appropriate by the City Council,
said fees to be paid at the time the building per.nit is issued.
(4) That subject property shail be developed substantially in accordance with plans
and specifications on £ile with the City of Anaheim marked Exhibit Nos, 1 and 2 provided,
however, that the plans shall be revised to reflect compliance with code required side
and rear yard setback requirementc.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTTON is signed and approved by/ me this 21st day of June, 1973.
ATrEST: "
SE~AR`"~ A~IVAHEI CITY PLAN"NING COMMISSION
STATE Or CAiIFOP.N7A )
COUNTY OP ORtiNGE ) ~S.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, Ann Kr~bE~ Secretary of the City Plannins Co~iisuior~ rE the City of Anaheim, do
hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was paased and adopted at a meeting of the
City Planning Cocamisaion of the City oi Anaheim, held on June 11, 1973, at 2:00 o'olock
p.m., by the following vote of the members thereof:
AYES: C0:'AIISSTOIN~RS: ALLRED, GAUER, HERBST,.KAYWOOD, ROWLAND, SEYMOUR.
:VOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE.
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: FARANO.
IN WITNESS WIiEREOF, I have hereunto seC my hand Chis 21st day o£ June, 1973.
~
SECRETARY ANAHE M CITY PLADINING COMMISSION
RESOLUTION N0. PC73-132 ~Z'