PC 73-133RESOLUTION~.
PC73-133 ~
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY PLANNING COMMIS~ION OF THE CITY OF ANAHE'[M
kECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF 72E73IT520F ANAHEIM THAT
PETITION FOR RECLASSIFICATION N0. BE DISAPPROVED
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission of fhe City oE Anaheim did receive e verified Petltion for Re-
classification from JAMES MATTHEWS, in care of Leonard Smith, 125-D South Claudina Street,
Anaheim, California 92805, Owner; LEONARD SMITH, 125-D South Claudina St.reeC, Anaheim,
California 92805, Agent of certa3n real property situat2d in the City uf Anaheim, County
of Orange, State of California, described as Lot 1 in block "D" of the Lorelei Tract,
as per map recorded i~~i Book 29, Page 24 of Miscellaneous Records of I.os Angeles County,
California
; end
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commis~ion did hold e public heering et the City Hnll in the City oE Aneheim
on June lI, I973, et 2:00 o'clock P.M. notice oE seid public hearing heving been duly given as required by
lew and in eccordence with the provlsions of the Maheim Municipel Code, Chepter 113,72, to hear end consider
evidence for and egeinst seid proposed recleasificetion and to investigate andmake :inilings andrecommendetionR
in connection therewith; end
WHEREAS, said Commission, eEler due inspection, investigntlon, and study m~ade by Itself and in its bc-
half, and etter due cortsideration oE all evidence end reports offered at snid hearing, dnes find end determine tne
following facts:
1. That the petitioner proposes a redessiEicetion of the ebove descr~bed property from the R-2~ MULTIPLE
FAMILX RESIDENTIAL, ZONE to the C-1, GENERAL COMMERCIAL, 20NE.
2, Thet Lhe proposed reclassification is not in conformance with the land use
designations of the General Plen.
3. That the proposed reclassification would be "spoC zoning" in an area p=imarily
developed for residential purposea to the south, north and eaat, end that the existing
street serves as a natural dividing line between existing industrial developmenL• and
the er.isting residential uses.
4. That approvaY of the proposed reclassification would establiah an undesirable
precedent encouraging requests fos continued comr~ercial uses along both sides of Broadway,
thereby deterring•rededelopment of the Center City'Area.
5. That the proposed use would nut be compatible with the exieting residential usec
long establiahed in this area.
6. That the proposed reclaseification of subject property is not necessary and/or
de3irable for the orderly and proper dPVelopment of the community.
7. That the proposed reclassification of subject property does not properly relate
to Ghe zones and their permittad uses locally established in close proximity to subject
property and to the zones and their permitted usea generally established throughout the
co~nunity.
S. That one person appeared in opposition.
RD ' 1"
v
,
~~~~~~~
~ ~
ENVIRONMENTAL II~'ACT REPORT FINDING:
That the Planning Commission, i.n connt:ction with an Exemption Declaration Status request,
finds and determines that the proposall would have no significant environmental impact
and, therefore, recommends to thP Citv Council tl:at no Environmental Impact Statement
is necessary.
NOW, THEREFORE, ~E IT RESOLVED that the Anahelm City Plenning Commlaslon does here~y recommend
to the City Council of the City of Anaheim that subject Petition for ReclassificeUon be denied on the besis of the
aforementioned findings.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is signed and approved by me this 218~day of Jdn~, ~1973.
ANAHE~17 CITY PLANNING MISSION ~
ATTEST:
/ /~
/~id~~??/J~C~ ~i(~~/
SECRETARY ANAHEI CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
STATE OF CALIFORNIR ;
COUNTY OF ORA~GE ) ss.
CIT° OF ANAfiEIM )
I, Ann Krebs, Secretery of the City Plenning Commission of the City of Anaheim, do hereb,y certify lhet the fore-
going resolution wns pessed ~nd adopted et a meeting of the City Plenning Commi~sion ofthe City of Aneheim, held on
June 11, 1973, at 2:00 o'r.lock P.M., by the following vote of the members thereof:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: ALLk~D, GAUER, HERBST, KAYIdOCD, SEYN.OUR.
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE.
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: FARANO, ROWLAND.
IN WITNFSS WHEdEOF, I heve hereunto set my hend this 21st day of. Junq~ L973.
~~
SECRETARY A:VAHEI CITY PLAtiNING COMMISSION
RESOLL~T?4N NO. PC73-133
R2-A
_2.