PC 73-155;ESOLUTI~NO. PCT3-155 ~_ _
A RESOLUTiON OF THE CITY PLANNII~G COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
RECOMMENDING TO THk: CITY COUNCIL OF '7f3HE 4I 6Y OF ANAHEIM THAT
PETITION FOR RECLASSIFICATION N0. BE APPROYED
WHEREAS, tne City Plenning Commission of the City oE Aneheim did recelve a verified Peiition for Reclassi~ca-
tionfrom NORTON AND BARBARA DRUILHET, 340 East Riverdale, Orange, Cslifornia 92667, Ownera;
DONALD FEAR~ A I A, 612 South Herbor Boulevard, Anaheim, California 92805, Agent of certain
real property situated in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State•of California, des-
cribed as That portion of the Southeast ~y of~-the Southwast ~ of Section 9, Township 4.South,
Range 10 [v"est, San Ber~ardino Base and Meridian, deacribed as follows: Beginning at the
Southwest corner of seid Southeast '~; thence North along the Weat line of said Southeasl•
'~, a distance ~f 827.30 feet to the South Iine of the Anaheim Homestead Tract as per map
recorded in nouk 26, page 10, Miscellaneous Records, in the office of the County Recorder
of Los Angel~s County, California; thence Easterly along eaid south line of the Anaheim
Homestead Trecc, e distance of 606.95 feet; thence South 823.48 fest to the south line of
said Southeas[ ~; thence West along said last menCioned south Iine, 606.95 feet to thz point
of beginning. ERCEPT therefrom thet portion lying Southerly.of the Northerly line of the
lar.d described 9n the deed to the Siate of California, recorded Mey 26, 1954 in book 2734,
page :92, Officiai Records of said Orange County. ALSO EXGEPT therefrom that portion lying
southoTesterly oi the northeaeterly line of the land deacribed as Pazcel 1 in the deed to the
Stnte of Californie, recorded January 13, 1956, in book 3352, page 437, Official Records of
aai~l Orange Counky
; end .
WHEREAS, thc City Plenning Commission did hold e public headng et the City Hell ia tht Clty of Artnhelm on
July 23, 1973, ot 2:00 o'cloek P.M. notice of seid public hearing heving been duly given as required by
law and in eccardence with the provisions of the Mnhrim Municipel Code, Chepter 18.72, to hear and consider evidence
for end ageinst sald pcoposed reclassification end to investigete and make findings end recommmdetlons in eonnection
therewith; end
WHEREAS, seid Commission, etter due inspection, investigetion, end study mede by itselE end in itn behalf, and
aftar due consideration of ell evldence end reports oEfcred et seia hearing, does find and determine the Eollowing tacts:
1. Thet lhe petitioneF proposes e reclasslficetion of the ebove described pmperty from the R-A, AGRICULTURAL,
ZONE to the C-1, GENERAL COMNiERCIAL, 20NE.
2. That the proposed reclessification ia not in conformance with the land useroximite
tiun of the General Plen, but is ir. confoxmance with the exiating zoning in cloae p Y•
3. ThAI the propoaed reclessit~cetion of subject pcoperty ls necessory end/or deaireble Car the orderly nnd pro-
pcr ~evelopme~.t ot the cummunity.
4. That the pcoposed reclessifitalion oE subject property does properly relete to the zones ond their pertnitted
uses lacetly eslr+i~iiahed ln close proximity to subJect pcopedy end tu the zones and thelr permitted uses generelly esteb-
lished thronghout the comm~nity.
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT rINDING:
That the Planning Commiseion, in connection with an Exemption DeclaraCion Status request,
finds and determines that the proposal would have no afgnificant environmental impect and,
therefore, recommends t~ the City Council that no Environmental Impact Statement is necessary.
R-A '1'
YOW, THEC''FC'.E, BE 1 SOI.VED thet the .~ntiheim City Plennl ~mmissioa does heaeby tecommcnd
t:~ the C.ty C.~uncil af the City nc+hei~n that subject Petition for Reclaa enflor, be aoproved and, by so doing,
that Title 18-Zonln~ of the Aneheim Municipal Code be amended to exclude the ebov~ described pmperty fmm ti~e
R-P., AGRICULTURAL, ZONE and to incorporate said described.property into ti-.e C-1,. GENERAT.
COMMERCIAL, ZONG, upon the following.conditicns which are hereby found to be a necessary
prerequisite to the proposed use of subject property in order to preserve the safety and
general welfare of the Citizens of the City of Anaheim: '
(1) That the sidewalks shall be installed along Wilshire Avenue as required by the
City Engineer and in accardance with standard plans and specifications on file in the office
of the City Engineer.
(2) That the owner(s) of subject property sha1Z pay to the City oi Anaheim the sum of
60 cents per front fuot along Wilshire Avenue for tree planring,purposes.
(3) That fire hydrants shall be •Lnstalle& and charged as required and determined to,be
necessary by the Chief of the Fire Depart~ent prior to commencemenE of structural framing.
(4) That a six-foot masonry wall shall be constructed a~ong L•he north property line.
(5) Th2t 15-gallon broad head xrees be planted along the norc.h properey line '15 feet
on center to -~•~•'ide an effective scxeen five years after planting.
(6) Th~t sil air condition~,ng fgcilities shall be properly shielded from view, and
the sound t%~-4tC~~~''~ from ~djacer.t properties.
('7) Th~t ~ny parking 2rea lighting proposed shall be down-lighting ef a maximum height
of ~ix feet, which '~ighting shall be directed away from the property iines to protect the
.-.^.ider.tir~l ir.:e;;'rity of the ar.ee.
~y) That s~ibject property shall be served bp pnderground ¢tilities.
(9) That the final parking plan shai;. be approved by the Developmeht Services Depart-
ment, and any landscaped areas in the parking area sh&11 be protected.with six-inch l~igh
concrate curbs, and concrete wheel stops shall be provided for parking..;speces.
~(10) That drainage of cubject property shall be disposed of in a manner that ia satis-
LF~tory to the Ci.ty Engineer.
(11) Tliar_ yppropriate water assessment fees as determined by the Director of Public
Utili.ties shall be paid to the City of Ar.aheim prior to the issuance of a Uuilding permit.
(1~) Th&t ;1L•ject property shall be developed sub'sCantial'ly i.n accordance with plans
and spccificatiocis on file with the City of Anaheim merk~d Exhibit Nos. 1 and 2.
(13) Priuc to the introduction of an ordinance rezc~ning subject property, Condition
;.~~. 2, above mentiun~d, siiall be completed. The provisicrns or rights granted by this reso-
Iution shall become null and void by action of the City Council until•such' time as-the City
Cauncil may graat.
(14) That Candition Nos. 1, 4, 5, 6, 7; $;y;9, 10 a~id 12, above mentioned, shall be
complied with prior to fina'~ building and zoniri~ inspect:i.ons.
THE FOREGO.i7G P.ESOLUTION is signed and approved by me this ~~ 2nd day of August, '1973. .
~ . ~I~~~~-e ~
CHAIRMAN ANAHEIM CITY PLANNIIVG COMMISSION
~'"TEST:
. C! `i'~t -
~F.CRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANN:NG COMMISSION
STATE OF CALIFJ"'~!''. )
CUUNTY OF ORAP :::: ) ss~
CITY OF ANAHEIII )
I, Ann Krebs; Secretery of the City Planning Commission of the City oE Maheim, da hereby certify that
thc :oregoing *~solution was passed and edopted at a meetin~ of the City Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim,
held on July 23, 1973, nt 2:00 o'clock P.na., by the following vote of the members thereof:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: ALLRED, GAUER, ;:ING, ROWLAND, SEYMOUR.
NOES: , COMMISSZONERS: NONE.
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: FARANO, HERBST,
, IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have heceunto set my hand this ~ 2nd day of August, 1973.
RESOLUTION NO.PC73-155
/
(~i~/W~'~/ i~~~`"`~...-c'~ -
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNIIVG COMMISSION
R2-A -~-