PC 73-160~ ~
RESOLUTION N0._. PC73-160
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY PLANNING COMMtSSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHHIM
THAT PETITION FOR VARIANCE NO. 2530 BE GRANTED
WHEREAS, the iity Planning Commission of thr City cf Aneheim did ceceive e verified Petition for Varience
fro~n PACIrTC mEI.EPHONP A.ID TELEGRAPH, 525 B Street, Room 1311, Post Office Box 524, San
Diego, Califdrnia 52112, Owner; WILl7At~i 0, MITCHELL, 525 B Street, Room 1311, Post Office
Box 524, San Diego, California 92112, Agent o£ certain real property situated in the City
of Anaheim, County of Orange, Stace of California, describEd as Lot 182, the Easterly 28
feet of the Southerly 55 feet of Lot 180, the Southarly 55 feet of Lot 181 and the Easterly
28 feet of Lot 183, Eucalyptus Forest Tract as per map recorded in book 5, pages 29 and 30
of Miscellaneous Maps, in the office of the county recorder of said county
; and
WHEREAS, the City Planning Conmission did hold a public heacing et the City Hell in the City of Anaheim
on July 23, 1973, et 2:00 o'clock P.M., notice of said public hearing heving been duly given as required
by law and in eccordance with the provisions of the Anaheim Municipel Code, Chapter 18.68,to hear end consider
evidence for and egainst said proposed verience and.;o investigate and make findings and recommendations in connec-
tion therewith; and
WHEREAS, seid Commission, efter due inspection, investigetion, end stud,y mede by itself end in its behalf,
and efter due consideration of all evidence and cepocts offered et said hea~ing, does find and determine the following
facts: ~ ~
That the petitioner requests a vaciance Ecom the Aneheim Municipal Code:
SECTION 18.52.020 ~- Permitted buildinQS structurea, and uses. (Mobile
office nof: permiCted; mobi~= ~ffice proposed)
2. That there are exceptional or extreocdinary circumstances or conditions appliceble to the property involved
or to the intended use of the property that do not apply general:y to the propecty or class of use in the same vicinity
and zone.
3. That the requested variance is necessery for the preservetion and,enjoyment o£ a substentiel property right
possesscd by uther property in the seme vicinitv and zone, end denied to the property in question.
4. That the requested varience will not be meterially detrimentel to the public welfare or injurious to the pmp-
erty or impcovements in such vicinity end zone in whicn the property is located.
5. That the petitioner stipulated the mobile office would be used for only three yeare
until development plans and construction for facilities were completed.
ENlTIROA'M~NTAL IMPF.CT REPORT FINDING:
That the Planning Commission, in connection with an Exemption Declaration Status request,
£inds and determines that the proposal would have no significant environmental impact and,
therefore, recommends to the Cicy Cour,cil thak no Environmentel Impact StaCement is necessary.
V1-G '1-
'NOW, T'HEREFORE, BE 1T RE50LVED that the Aneheim Clty Planning Co~mmission does heteby grent subject
Petition for Variance, upon the foltowing conditions which are hereby found to be a necessery prerequisite to Uie pro-
posed use of the subject pcopecty in ocder to p:eserve the sa;'ety and generel welfare oE the Citizens of the City of
Anaheim: ,
(1) That the sidewaiks, curba and gutters sl:a.ll b~ repaired slong La Palma Avenue
as required by the City Engineer and in accordance witli stand~r.d plans and specifications
on file in the office of the City Engineer.
(21 That ttash storage areas shall be provided in accordance with approved plans on
file with the office of the Director of Public Works.
(3) That fire hydrants shall be installed and charged ae required and determined to
be neceseary by the Chief of the Fire Department.
(4) That a Cime limitation of three years shall be granted for the use of eubjeCt
property.and; upon request by the petitioner, an additional period of time may be granted
upon approval by the Planning Comwission and/or City Council.
(5) That subject property ahall be developed substantially in accordance with plans
and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim aarked Exh~.bit Nos. 1, 2, and 3.
(6) That Condition Nos. 1, 2, and 3, above mentioned, shall be complied with prior
to the cummencement of the activity authorized under this resolution, or prior to the time
that the building permit is issued or within a period of one year fram date hereof, which-
ever occurs first, or such further time as the Planning Commisaion may grSnt.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION ie signed and approved by me this 2nd day of August, 1973.
ATTEST:
C'%~~P ~l~u-~~ ~
CgpII2B1AN ANAFiEI6i CTfY PLANNQiG COl'd~9ISSI0N ~
~~~~ ~~~
SECRETARY ANAHE CITY PLANNING COl~fISSION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) 88~
CTfY OF ANA{~EIM )
I, Ann Krebs, Seccetary of the City ~'lenning Commission of the City of Aneheim, do hereby certify ;hat
the foregoing resolutlon was pessed end adopted at a meef3ng o£ the City Planning Coomission of tha City o[ Anel~eim,
held on July 23, 1973~ at 2:00 o'ciock P.M., oy the following vote of the members thereof:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: ALLRED, GAUER, KING, ROWLAND, SEYMOUR.
NOES: COMMISSEONERS: NONE.
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: FARANO, HERBST,
LW WITNFSS WHEREOF, I have heaenato set my hend this 2nd day of August, 1973.
RESdLU?ION N0. PC73-160
C~~~'~~i
SECRETARY ANAHETdI CITY PLANNR~TG COMMISSION
V2-G '2'