PC 73-171_ ~ ~
RESOLUTION N0. PC73-i71
A RE50LUTION OF THE CITY PL,ANNING COh717ISSION OF THE CITY OF RNAHEIM
RECOMMENDLHG TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF 73E7CITYOOF ANAHEIM THAT
PETITION FOR RECLASSIFICATION NO. 4 BE APPROVED
WHEREAS, the City Plenniug Commission of the City of Anaheim did i n i t i ate a Pet i t i on for Rec 1 as5 i-
Fication on prope;ty situated in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California,
described as Portion 3- PARCEL THREE: Lots 1, 2 and 3 and all that portion lying south of
said Lot One bounded on the west by the southerly prolongation of the west line of said Lot
One, and bounded on the east b~ the west right of way tine of Kathryn Drive and bounded on
the so~th by the north ri9ht of way line of Lincoln Averiue, and all that parcel shown as
~ot a part of this subdivision, all in and sh~w~ on the map of Tract No. 1633 recorded in
Bcok 47, page 5~o Miscellaneous Maps, records of Orange County. Excepting therefrom any
po~tion ther•eof lying within Lincoln Avenue on the south and Brookhurst Street on the east.
PROPERTY OWNERS;
Jack-in-the-Box, 933~ Balboa Avenue, San Diego, California 92123
Crocker Citizens N~tional Bank, 1 Montgomery Street, San Francisco, California 94120
Edward Shoemaker, et al, c/o Oscar Louderback, 12201 Burns Drive, Garden Grove, California 92640
Standard Oil Company, 225 Bush Street, San I'rancisco, Californix 94120
; and
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did hold e public hearing et the City Hall in the City of Anaheim on
August 6, 1973o at 2:00 o'clock P.M. notic: of said public hearing heving been duly given es cequired by
lew and in accordance with the provisions of the Aneheim Municipal Code, Chepter 18.72, to hear end consider evidence
for and against said pioposed reclessification and to investigate end meke findings end cecommendetions in connection
the~ewith; and
WHEREAS, said Commission, efter due inspection, investigetion, and study mede by itself and in its behalf, end
efter due consideration of all evidence end ceports oEfered at seid heering, does Eind end determine the following Eects:
9, That the Pla~ning Cemmissinn proposes a reclassifitation of the above described
property from the R-A, AGRICULTURAL ZONE to the C-3, F;EAVY COMMERCIAL, ZONE.
2. That the Pla~nirsg Commission in reviewing the surrounding land uses has determined
tF~at although some of the uses establishea on subject property may be heavy commercial uses,
the surrou^ding land uses are primarily general coiTrnercial, and approv~l~ of the C-3.Zone
would be creati~9 "spot zoning" thereby encouraging other properties in the area to request
similar zo~ing, tfierefo:e, it is deemed appropr%ate that subject properties be zoned C-1.
3. That the recommVnded zoning in th~ reclassifi~~ation of subject property is in ,
conformance with the land use desigration of the General Plan.
4, That the City of Anaheim would initiaCe the necessary zoning actions to bring into
corformance those uses existi~g on subject property which would be ,ade non conforming upon
the adoption of C-S zoning.
$. Thet the pcoposed reclassificetion of subject property is necessary end/or desireble for the orderly ar:d pro-
per development oE the community.
6. That the proposed ceclessificetion oE subject property does properly relate to the zones end their permitted
uses locnlly established in close proximity to subject ptupetty end to the zones and their permitted uses generelly esteb-
lished throughouS the community. •
ENVIRORMENTAL lMPACT REPORT FINDING:
That the Planning Commission, in connection with an Exemption Declaration Status request,
finds and determines that the ~roposal would have no significant environmental impact and,
therefore, recommends to the City Council that no Environmental Impact Statement is necessary.
R_A -1-
• NOW, THEREFORE, BE I~ SOLVED that the Aneheim City P1ann~Commission does herohy ;ernmmend
to the City Council of the City oi Anaheim that subject Pctition for ReclaesiEicelion be appmved end, by so doing,
that Title 1&Zoning of the Aneheim Municip~l Code be amended to excludo the above described property fmm t~ ~e~ ~
R-A, AGRICULTURAL, ZONE and to incorporate said described property into the C-~, R~
COMMERCIAL, ZONE, upon the following ~onditions which are hereby found to be a necessary
prereyuisite to the proposed use of s~sbject property in order to preserve the safety and
general welfare of the Citizens of the City of Anaheim:
(i) That the sidewalks shall be installed along the west side of Kathryn Drive as
required by the City E~gineer and in accordance with standard plans and specifications on
file i~ the office of the l:ity Engineer.
(2) That the owner(s) of subjeci: property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the sum
of $2.00 per front foot alo~g Katliryn Crive, Brookhurst Street, and Lincoin Avenue for
street lighting purposes.
(3) That the owner(s) of subje.:t property shail pay to the City of Anaheim the sum
of 60 cents per front foot alony Kathryn D~rive, Brookhurst Street and Lincoln Avenue for
tree planti~g pu~poses.
(4) That trash storage areas shall be provided in accordance with approved plans on
file with the office of the Director of Public Works.
(5) That fire t~ydra~ts shall be installed ard.charged as required and determined to
be necessary by the Chief of the Fire Department,
(6) That a six-foot masonry wall shall be constructed along the north property lines
except where abutting C-i property.
(7) That all air conditioning facilities shall be p~operly shielded from view, and
the sou~d buffered from adjacent properties.
(8) That-any parki~g area lighting proposed shall be down-lighting, which shall be
dtrected away from the property lines to protect the residential integrity of the area.
(9) That drair~age or subject property shall be disposed of in a manner that is
satisfactory to the City Engineer.
(10) That ordinances reclassifying the property shall be adopted as each parcel is
ready co comply with co~ditio~s pertaining to such parcel, provided however~ that the word
"parcel" shall mea~ presently existing parcels of record a~d any parcel or parcels approved
by the City Council for lot split,
(11) Prior to the introduction of an ordinance rezoning subject property, Condition
Nos. 2 and 3, above mentioned shall be completed. The provisions or rights granted by this
resolution shall become null and void by action of the City Council unless said conditions
are compiied with within one year from the date hereof or such further time as the City
Cou~cil may grant.
(12) That Condi,tion.Nos. 9, 4, 5, 6. 7s 8 and 9, above mentioned, shall be complied
with prior to finai bui~idin~'Cdu'zoning inspections. '
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is signed and approv d by me this 16th day of August, 1973.
p~,Ihr„r/t~u0 ~`~~Q~ ' -
~
CHAIRMAN ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
AT.TEST:
~~`~S~-~
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PI~ANIdING COMMISSION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF AN:IHEIM )
!, Ann Krebs, Se:retary of the City Planning Commission of the City oE Aneheim, do heceby certify that
the foregoing resolutio~i was pa:~sed and adopted.at a meeting of the City Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim,
held on August fi, 1 ~]3. et 2:07 o'clock P.M., by the following vote of the members theceof:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: FF~RANO, GFUER, HERBSTo KING, ROWLAND, SEYMOUR.
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE.
AASE;NT: COMMISSIONERS: ALLRED.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this j6th day of August, 1973.
RESOLtiTION NO.PC73-~71
R2-A
~~~~~
SECREZ'ARY AN~C:TY PLANNING COMMISSION
-2-