PC 73-189~ ~
RESOLUTION NO. PC73-u8~
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
THAT PETITION FOR VARIANCE N0. 2541 BE GRANTED
N'HER~AS, the City Planning Commission of the City of Aneheim did ceceive a verified Petition for Veriance
from SANDMAN M6'iELS, INC., 2082 Business Center Drive, Irvir~e, California 92664, Owner;
HEATH 6 COMPANY, 3225 Lacy Straet, Los Anqeles, Califcr~ia 9Q031, Agent of certain real
property situated i~ tne City of Ar,aheim, Cou~ty of Orange, State oT Caiifornia described
as That ~ortion of Lot 28 of Anaheim Extensio;c, as shown on a map of survey made by William
Hammel and filad i~ tss~ o"ice o` the County Reccrder of Los Ange]es County, California, a
copy of which is shcwn in book 3, page 16y et seq., ertitled "l.os A~geles Ccu;~ty Maps", re-
cords ef said Orange Co~~ty, i~G?uded with3n the foliowing described lines: Beginnin9 at the
intersection cf the c:e~~~er 3's~= of Vermo~t Street, formerly Bruad Street, with the cenYer
line of Ha;bor Bou)evard, formerly Palm Sk~eet, as show~ cn a map f;led in bcok 26, page 36,
Record or SL'l'V2y5n i;1 the crfic~ of ti:e coun:y re<:order of said Ora~ge County; thence South
15° 48' 00" East 983.00 `e~t alcrg said cert°r '3na of Harbor Boulevard to thE L-rue point of
begirning; chence Soutn 15° ~' 00" East oS0 feet; the~ce Soutti 74~ 27' 30" West perallel with
said center iine of Ver~r~~t Street, 196.00 f~~t; thezce t:~rth i5° 48' 00" West paraltel with
said cente~ lir:~ o` Harbcr Bcu3evard, 47 fe~*_; t::ence South 74° 27' 30" West 20 feet; thence
Idorth 15° 48' 00" Wes~ 63 `e~t; thence North 74~ 27' 30" East 2i6 feet to the true pcint of
beginrina
; end
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at the City Hall in the City of Aneheim
on August 20, 1973, at 2:00 o'clock P.M., notice of said public hearin~ having been duly given es requiced
by lew and in accocdence with the provisions of the Aneheim Municipal Code, Chepter 18.68,to hear end consider
evidence for end egeinst seid prcposed verience end to investigate end make Eindings and recommendotions in connec-
tion therewith; and
WHEREAS, said Commissien, after due inspection, investigation, end study mede by itself and in its behelf,
end after due consideration of ell evidence end ceports offered at seid hearing, daes find end determine the following
fects: ~
1. Thet the petitioner requests a variance Erom the Anaheim Municipal Code:
SECTION i8.37.040(B-~) - Locafion of free-standinq siqns.(I~lithin center 20% of
property required; within ce~ter 45% of property pr~-
posed)
~
2. Thet there a:e exceptional or extreordinary circumstences or conditions applicable to the property involved
or to the intended use oE the property that do not epply generelly to the property or cless of use in the seme vicinity
and zone.
3. That the requested verience is necessery for the preservation and enjoyment oE a substentiel property right
possessed by other property in the seme vicinity and zone, end denied to the propecty in question.
4. That the requected veriance will not be m:terially detrimentel to the public welfate or injurious to the prop-
erty or impcovements in such vicinity and zone in which the property is located.
ENVIRONPIENTAL VMPACT REPORT FINDING:
That the Planning Commission, in connection.with an Exemption Declaration Status request, finds
and determines that the proposal would have no significant environmental impact and, therefore,
reconi~~ends tothe City Council that no Environmental Impact Statement is necessary.
V1-G -1-
~
C
ATOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED thet the Aneheim City Plenning Commission does hereoy grant subject
Petition for Variance, upon the following r.onditions which are herehy found to be a necessary pcere~uisite to the pro-
posed use of the subject property in order to pceserve the safety and generel welface of the Citizens oE the Clty of
Anah~;im:
(1) That adequate clezrance of existing electrical lines shall be provided as required
by the Electrical Divis3o~, Department of Public Utilities, and the State of California G.O.
95.
(2) That subject property shall be developed substantially in cor.formahce with Flans
and specificat~ons on file with the City of Anaheim, marked Exhibit Nos. 1 atid 2.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is signed and epproved by me tliis 30th day of August, 9973.
ATTEST:
CHAIRMAN ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
~ ~~~~
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COliNTY OF ORANGE ) 8$•
CITY OF ANAHEIIH )
I, Arz KreSs, Secretary of the City Plenning Commission of Uie City oE Anaheim, do hece4y certify thet
the foregoing resolution wes passed end adopted et e meeting of the City Plenning Commission oE the City of Aneheim,
held on AtsgLSt 20 p 9 973 n et 2:00 o'clock P.M., by the following vote of the members thereof:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: ALLRED, FARANO, GAUER, HERBST, KING, SEYMOUR.
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ROWLAND,
ABSENTi COMMISSIONERS: NONE,
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have her~unto aet my hend this 30th ~'ay or Augus ~, ~ 973.
RESOLUTION N0. Pc73-189
~~~ ~'~'~~-
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
V2-G -2-