PC 73-200RESOLITI~ N0. PC73-200 ~~=
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY PLANNiNG COh1MISS[ON OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
THAT PETITION FOR VARIANCE N0. 2546 BE GRANTED I N PART
WHEREAS, the (;ity Ylanning Commission of the City of Maheim did receive a verificd Petition for Variance from
CENl'RAL LIN-BROOK HARDWARE, INCORPORATED, 2144 West Lincolr Avenue, Anaheim, Calif-
ornia 92801, Owner; JOSEPH H. DOYLE, 6800 Orangethorpe f~venue, Buena Park, California
90620, Agent of certain real property situated in the Cety of Anaheim, Ceunty of Orange,
State of California described as The Westerly f70.Ot~ fect of the southerly 195.00 feet
of the southwest quarter of the northeast quarter of the northwest quarter of Section
16, Township 4 South, Range i0 West, in the Rancho San .luan Cajon De Sa~ta Ana, as per
map recorded in Boak 51 Page 10 of Miscellaneo~s Maps, (n the office of the County Re-
corder of said c~unty. Said land is a portion of Lot 7 of the Helen b Lynch Subdivi-
sien, as per map recorded in Book 442 Page i58 of deeds, in the office of the county
recorder af Los Angeles County, California. Portion of said land is shown as Parcel
1 en a parcel map filad in Book 22, Page 10 of parcel maps, in the office of the county
recorder of said county
WHEREAS, tha City Planning Ccmmission did hold a public hearing at thc City Hall in the City of Anaheim on
Septembe r 5, 1973 . at 2:00 o'clock p.m., notice of said public hearing having been duly ~ivcn as required by law and
in accordanee with the provisions of the Anaheim Municipal Code, Chapter 18.68, to hear and consider evidence for and against said
proposed variance and to investigate and make findings and recommendatians in connection therewitli; and
WHGREAS, said Corimission, aftcr due inspection, investigation, and study made by itself and in its behalf, and aftcr due
consideration, of all cvidence and reports ofCered at :aid hearing, dacs find and determine the following facts:
1. That the petitioner requests;the followi'ng variances Lrom the Anaheim Municipal Code to
establish ar, auto and recreational vehicle storage facility:
a. SECTION 18.52.020 - Permitted uses. (Auto and recreational vehicle
storage proposed)
b. SECTION 18.52.060(2-a-1) - Front aerback. (56 feet required; 10 feet exieting)
c. SECTION 18.63.030 ~ Location of billboard. (Permitted at the inter-
section of two arterial highways; interaection of
one arterial highway and one local streeC proposed)
d. SECTION 18.63.050(b) - Billboard setback. (Minimum of 25 feet required;
3 feet proposed)
c~. S~~~jION~g•~~ 058(d-I) - Billboard support. (Steel support requiredr wood
- support proposed)
??'•..xha( wa~vere k-c, 1-d~ .~nd 1-e, above merttioned, are hereby denied on the basis that
t~ee~,,.'Apased,'us:p ~g ~he prm~Rrt~ for stora~e purpeses did not warranC consideration of bill-
bo,rras sldv~rL1§~i4T'~~ anothEer loc~l:ion,. and the petitioner did not submit aubstantiating evi-
~~qE@ ch~at woaldd iR(Ii~6A'te h,c y,p~~11d ~ne denied a privilege en3oyed by other properties in the
atea,
3: 'Tl~aC Wz;,iver 1-bs ,;~bove mentioned is hereby granted on the basis that adjoir.ing
Y?zOp`'~f 1~es ~oa eth~ norch sqd~ o£ :the etreet have all been developed with aimilar front set-
't~l.ac~k~.
4.. 'tT~re,t :'~ihe PcKitLoner stipulated that in the event subject petition aS granted is
~~t'FUpt~lf~j~ Eci~ ~~~e n~~i L•enant, that he would request termination of Conditional Use Permi.t
No, _113T.
5. xh:~( chere ~~1'~ exceptional or extraordinary circumetances or conditions applicable
[a the pron.e.;~y involved or to the intende~ use of the property, as granted, t.hat do not
~~~ply gelterAlly to the proper.ty or class of use in the same vicinity and zones.
Vl-D
DEV-66•E
~ ~ . ,. _
6. Tha* the requested variance, as granted, is necessary for the preservation and
enjoyment of a substantial property rignt possessed by other property in the same vicinity
and zone, and denied to the property in question.
7. That the requested variance, as granted, will not be materially detrimental to the
public welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in such vicinity and zone in
which the properry is located.
8. That the p_titioner stipulated to maintenance of the landscaping ~nd thrt it would
be made a part of the lease of the property.
ENVIRORr1ENTAL IMPACT REPORT FINDING:
That the Planning Commission, in connection with An Exemption Declaration Status request,
finds and determines that the proposal would have no significsnt environmental impact and,
therefore, recommends to the City Council that no Environmental Impact Statement is nec-
essary.
NOtd, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning Co~mnission does hereby grantin
'part subject PetiCion for Variance, upon the following conditions which are hereby found
to be a necessary prerequisite to the propoced use of the subject property in order to
preaerve the safety and general welfare of the Citizens of the City of. Anal:eim:
(1) That subiect property shall be developed substantially in conf.ormance with
plans and specif'_cations on Eile with the City of Anaheim marked Exhibit Nos. 1 and 2.
(2) That in order to determine whether any adverse effect will resuit from granting
of subject patition, the Ylanning Commission grants a one year time limitation, after
which time consideration may be given to whether the waivers 'should be extended.
THE FORaGOING RESOLUTION is signed and approved by me this 13th day of September, 1973.
0~~ , I~'~
CHAIRMA AY HEIM CI1 PLAN ING COMMISS
ATTGST:
~~J ~-~,,.~
SECRETARY Ar1AHEI CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
STATE Or CALIFORICIA )
~COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ee.
CIT1 OF ANAHEIM )
I, Ann Krebs, Secretary of the Ctty Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim,.do hereby
certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting of the City
Planning Commission of the City of Aneheim, hei3 on September 5, 1973, at 2:00 o'clock
p.m., by the following vote of the me~nbers thereof:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: FARANO, GP.l1ER, 1iERBSi, KING, SEYMOUR.
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE.
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ALLRED, ROWLAND.
IN WITNE~SS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set may hand Chis 13th dmy of September, 1973.
~ ~r?jl~ ` _~
SEC?'.ETAt.IY ANAHEI CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
RESOLUTION 190. PC73-200 -Z'