PC 73-212i'
~ .. .. ~ ~
RESOLUTION NO. P~73-Z~Z .
A RESOLUTION OF THE CiTY PLANNING COMMISSiON OE THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
RF,COMMENDING TO THE CITY COi3NCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM THAT
PETITION FOR RECLASSIFxCA'CION N0. .1 '~~~'i9 - BE APPROV.F.a
WHEREAS, the Ciry Plenn:ng Commission oE the City of Anaheim d(d recelve a v~rified PetiGon ~ot ReslessiG.ce-
tionfrom RDBERTSHAW FULTON CONTROLS, 1701 8yrd Avenue, Richmond, Virgi~ia 23261, Owner of
certain real property situated in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of Caiif-
ornia described as A portion of Lot 2U o'F Tract No. 190, as per rcnap..recorded in ~ouk 23,
page 50 of Miscellaneous Maps, in the off'ice of th2 county recorder of ~aid coutity,
bounded as follows: On the West by a line parallel with the East ~ine of Section 22,
Township 4 South, Range 10 West, San 6erna~rdino dase and Meridian, and distant westerly
1008.00 feet therefrom, measured at right ang3es; on the South by the North lir,e of the
Scuth 175 feet of said Lot 20; on the northea,st by the northeasterly boundary of the
land conveyed to Leo Freedman by deed recorded June 1; ~955, ~n booYc 3088, page 167,
Official Records, in the offi.:e of the county recorder of said Orang~ County, and on
the North by the North line of said Lot 20. •
; end
WHEREAS, the City Plenning Commission ~id hold e public headng at the City He11 in the City of Annheim on
September 1~, ~973. et 2:00 o'clock P.M. notiee of seid public hearing heving 6een duly given es requiced by
law end in eccordence with the provisions of the Aneheim Municipel Code, Chepter 18.72, to hear and consider evidence
for end aRainst s9ld proposed ceclassificetion end to investlgete and make findings end recommendetions In eonnectlon
therewith; and
WHEREAS, seid Commisslon, aEter due Inspection, investigation, end study made by itselE end in its behelf, end
after due considecetion of ell evidence end reports ofEered et seid hearing, does find end determine the Eollowing iects:
1. Thet the petitioner proposes e reclessificetion of the above described propecty from the R-A, AGR I CULTURAL
ZQNE to the M=1, LIGHT INDUSTRIAL, ZONE,
2. That the proposed reclassification is not in conformance with the land.use des-
ignation of the General Plan, although it would be an extension of the existing industrial
development in the area,
3. Thet the proposed [eciessiCecetion af snbjeot property Is necessery ond/or desirable tor the orderly end pro-
per development of the commpnity,
4. Thet the proposed ceclassification of s~y~Ject property does propetly relate to the zones and thelr pertnitted
uses locelly eatnblished In close proRf.mitp to subject property and to thr zones and their permltted uses generally esteb-
llshed throughout the community.
5. That the proposed reclassification of sribject prope~ty requires the dedicaEton
and improvement of abiatting streets in accordance wtth the Ci~culation Eiement of the
General Plan, due to the aniicipated increase in traffic which witl be generated by'the
intensificatiun of land use.
6. That recommendati~n uf approval of subject petition is hereby made on the basis
that Clementine Street would be the natural buffer between the commercial recreation and
industrial uses, and it would be a further logical extension of industry along the free-'
way frontage.
R-A '1'
~ • .. - ~
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FINDING:
That the Planning Commission, in connection with an Exemption Declaration Status request,
finds and determines that the proposal would have no significant~environmental impact and,
therefore, recommends to the City Council that no Environmental Ir,~pact Statement is neces-
sary.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLYED that the Anaheim City Planning i.ammiss~on does hereby
recommend to the City Council o` the City of Anahe3m that subject Pet'ition t~~r Reclassifi-
cation be approved and, by so doing, that Title 18-Zoning of the A~aheim Municipal Code
be amended to exclude the above described property from the R-A, AGRICULTURAL 2~~NE and to
incorporate said described property into the M-1, LIGHT INDUSTRIAL, ZONE, upon the follow-
ing conditions which are hereby found to be a necessary prerequisite to the proposed us~e
of subject property =n order to preserve the safety and general welfare of the Citizens
~f the City of Anaheim:
(i) That the cwner(s) of subject property shala deed to the City of Anaheim a strip
of ]and 45 feet in width from the centerline of the streei along Manchester Avenue for
str'eei wldening purposes.
(2~ That 5idewalks shall be installed a5 required by the City Engineer and in
accordance with standard plans and spec+fica~ions on fiie in the office of the City
Engineer.
(3) 7hat street liqhting facilities along ClemenYine SCreet, Manchester Avenue and
Alro Way shall be installed as required b~~ the Directoc of Pubiic Utilities, and in
accordance with standard pl.ans a~d specifications on f'fl~ in the office of the Director
of Pu61ic Utilities and that a bond in an amou~t and f~rm satlsiactory to the Clty af
Anaheim shall be posted with the C'sty Lo gu0rantee the iAStallation of the above mentioned
requirements.
(4) That trash storage areas sha]1 be p~'~v+ded in atcor'~dance with approved plans
on file with the offiee of the Director of PubFic 4i~rks.
(5) That fire hydrants shall be installed and charged as required and determined
to be necessary by the Chief of the Fire Department prio.r to c~mmencement of structural
Yraming.
(h) That all air conditioning facilities shall be properiy strielded from view, and
Lhe sound buffer~:d from adjacent properties.
(7) That subJect property shall be served by underground uiilities.
(8) That a 6-foot masonry wall shall be constructed along t'he south property line.
(9) 7hat drainage of subject property shall be disposed of 3n a manner satisfactory
to the Ciey Engineer.
(10) 7hat si,+bject property shall be developed substantially.l+~ accordrrace with edopterJ
City Council MeY.+~] Buiiding Policy.
(11) That rfght-of-way be reserved as required for the future Anaheim Boulevard-
Haster Streec ov~er~:rossing of theSanta Ana Freeway as approved by the Department of
Transportation.
(12) That the final parking plan shall be approved by the Developmenti asrv3ces Oepart-
ment, and any landscaped areas in the parking areas shall be protected with 6-inch, concrete
curbs, and concrete..wheel stops shall be provided for parking spaces.
(13) Prior to the introdu~tion of an ordinance rezoning subject prop~rty, Condition
Nos. 1, 3 and 11, above mentioned, shall be completed, The provisions or rights granted
by this resolution shall become null ana void by ac.tlon of the CSty Council unless said
conditiuns are complied with ~~ithin one year from .*,'he date hereof, or such further tirtee
as the City Louncil may grant.
(14) That Condition Nos. 2, 4, 6, 7, 8, 9. 10 and 12, above me~tioned, shall be c;,m-
plied with prior to final building and zoning inspe~ctions.
a r. :
~
~~
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is signed and appr~oved by me this 27th day of September, 1973.
~~ .~~
CHAIRMAN ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMI55 N
ATTEST:
SECRETARY ANAHEIM'CITY PLANNIN6 COMMISSION
STATE OF CALIFOkNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
i,lTY OF ANAHEIM )
I, Ann Krebs, Secretary of the,City Planning Commission of the City of Anahaim, do hereby
certify that the foregoing resoluflon was passed and adopted at a R~eeting of the City
Planrting Comm.ission of the City of Nnaheim, lield on September 17, 1973~ at 2:U0 o'clock
P.M., by the following vote of the members thereof;
AYES: COMM:SSIONERS: ALLRED~FARANO, GAUER, HERBST; KING;-R0IJLAND, SEYMOUR,
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NO~~E.
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE.
IN WITNE55 WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand ttii~ 27LFi~;day of~5epfember, 1973.
~~-~-r/ .~/
SECRETARY ANANEI~,Y~PLANNING COMMI5510N
RESOLUTION N0. PC73-212 -3-