PC 73-220RESOLUTIOI~. PC -220 ~
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
THAT PETITION FOR VARIANCE N0. 255Z BE GRANTED
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim did ceceive a verified Petition for Varience
from JOHNNY L. FREDERICK, 522 South Westgate Drive, Anaheim, California 92806, Owner of
certai^ real property situated in the City of Anaheim, County of Qrange, State of California,
desc-ibed as Lot No. 13 of Tract No. 4182
; and
WHEREAS, the Cily Planning Commission did hold e public hearing At the City Hall in the City of Anaheim
an October 1, 1973, at 2:00 o'clock P.M., notice o£ said public heecing heving been duly given as cequired
by lew end in accordence with the provisions of the Anaheim Municipel Code, Chapter 18.68,to hear and considcr
evidence for end egainst seid proposed variance and to Investigete and make findings end recommendations in connec-
tion therewith; end
WHEREAS, said Commissinn, aEter due inspection, investigation, en:1 study made by itself and ir. ~ts behalf,
and aEter due considecetion of all evidence end reports offered et said hearing, does find and detecmine the following
fects: ~
1. That the petitioner requests e variance fcom the Anaheim Municipal Code:
a. SECTION 18.24.030(2) - Minimum side yard setback. ( feet requir•ed;
16 inches proposed)
b. SECTION 18.24.030(3)_a~.,- Minimum rear yard setback, 10 feet required;
8 inches proposed)
2. Thet tliere ace exceptionel or extrnordinnry aircuinstances or bonditions epp]icable to the property involved
or to [he intended use of the praperty that do not apply genetelay Qo the ptoperty or cless of use in the same viclnity
and zone.
3. Thet the requested variance is necessary frsr the preservation and enjoyment of a substential pmperty right
possessed by other property in the seme vicinity and zone, end denicd to the property ln question.
4. That the requested veriance will not be materiallp detrimen2al to the public welfare or injurious to the prop-
erty or improvements in sucfi vicinity end zone in whi~h 'the property !s locat~d.
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FINDING:
That the Pla~ning Commission, in connection with an Exemption Declaration Status request,
finds ar,d determines that the propasal would have no significant environmental impact, and
therefore, recommends to the City Council that no Environmental Impact SCatement is necessary.
V1-G -1-
NOW, THF.REFORE, BE IT ~OLVED thet the Aneheim City Plenning~mission does hereby grent subject
~ Petition for Vecience, upon the foll g conditions which are heceby found to necessery prerequisite to the pro-
'posed use of the subject property in ordec to preserve the safety and gAaerel welfece of the Citizens of the City of
Anaheim:
'. (7) That subject property shall be developed substantially in accordance with plans
artd specifications on file with the City of Anaheim marked Exhibit No. 1, provided however,
tha't the existi~9 structure shall be brought up to the minimum standards of the City of
Anaheim, includi:~g the Uniform Building, Plumbing, Electrical, Housing, Mechanical and
Fire Codes as adopted by the City of Anaheim.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is aigned and epproved by me this 11 th day ~f Octobe~-, t973•
~~,Q,/Qlt+~.i/)A,~ e ~_-~-~'>/i,~0~
CHAIRMAN ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION ~
ATTEST:
SECRETARY ANAHE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ge.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
!, Am Ke'ebs, Secretary oE the City Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim, do hereby certiEy thet
the foregoing resolution was passed end edopted at e meeting oi the City Plenning Commission ufthe City of Anc~heim,
hetd on Oc•`r~ber t P 1973r at 2:00 ~'clock P.M., c~~ the following vote oE the members theceof:
AYES: COMMISSIONEI2S: ALLRED, FARANO, GAUER, HcRBST, KING, ~EYMt7UR.
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE.
AeSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ROWLAND.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I heve heceunto ae! my hand this 1'I th day of October, : 1973.
~.2%YliYC/ ~
SECRETARY ANAHE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
RESOLUTION N0. PC73-220
V2-G -2-