PC 73-234h ~ ~
RESOLUTION N0. PC73-234
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY PLANNING COh4hTI5SI0N OF THE CITY OF ANAHF.IM
THAT PETITION FOR VARIANCE N0. 2559 BE GRANTED
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission of the City of Aneheim did receive e vedfied Petifion for Verience
from BARCLAY'S BANK, 1025 Enst Orangethorpe Avenue, Anaheim, Calffornia 92806; ARCHIE
PREISMAN, 9465 Wilshire Bouleverd, Beverly Hills, California 90212, Ownera; HOWARD PARSELL,
in care of Mc Lean & Schultz, Consultants, 2000 Eaet Chapmen Avenue, Fullertor., California
92631, Agents of certain real property aituated in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange,
State of California, described ae Those portions of the Southeast quarter of the Southeast
quarter of Section 3k, in Townahip 3 South, Range 10 West, itt the Rancho San Juan Cajon de
Santa Ana, as shown on a map thereof recorded in Book 51, Page 7, Miecellaneous Maps,
records of said Orange County, described as followe: Beginning at a point in the South
line of said Southeast quarter which is distant thereon 192 feet Westerly £rom the South-
east corner of said Section 34, and running thenae Northerly parallel with the East line
of said Southeast quarter, 200 feet; thence Weaterly parallel with the Sauth line of said
Southeast quarter, 75 feet; thence Northerly perallel with the East line of said South-
east quarter 165 feet; thence Westerly parallel with the South line of said Southeast
quarter, 197 feet;;thence Southerly parallel with the East line of said Southeast quarter,
365 feet to the South line of said Southeast quar.ter; thence Easterly aloag said South
line, 272 feet to the point of beginaing
; end
WHEREAS, the City Plenning Commission did hold a public hearing et the City Hell in the City of Anaheim
on October 15, 1973, at 2:00 o'clock P.td., notice of said publlc hearing having been duly given ns requlred
by lew and in accordence with the provlsions of the Meheim Municipal Code, Chepter 18,68,to hear end consider evI-
dence tnr and against seid proposed varlence and to lnvesUgete and meke findinge and recammendetlons in connectlon
therewith; end
WHEREAS, seid Cammission, eftei due Inspectlon, investlgetlon, and study made by itself end in lts behelf,
and atter due consideretion of all evidence end ceports offered at seId hearing, does find end determIno the following
fects:
1. Thet the petltloner cequeats a varience from the Aneheim Munlcipel Code ae follows to construct a
canopy over drive-in teller windowa of an existing benk building:
SECTION i8,52.060(2-a-1) - piinimum setback. (50 feet required; 19 feet
propoaed) ;
2. T'het there are exceptionel or extrnordinnry circumstencea or condItians applicable to the property involved
or to the intended use of the pcoperty thet do not apply generally to the property or clasc of use ln the seme vicinity end
wne.
3. That the requested verience is necexsery for the preservetion and enjoyment of e substentiel property ci,;ht
possessed by other property in the same vicinity and zone, end denled to the property in question.
4. Thet H~e requested veriance will nui be moterielly detrimentel to the public welferc or injur3ous to the prop-
erty or improvements in such vIcInity end zone in which the property is located.
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FINDING:
That the Planning Coumiission, iu connection with an Exemption Declaration Status rEqueqt,
finds and determine~ that the prpposal would have no significant environmental im¢act ~nd,
therefore, recommends to ttre City Council that no Environmental Impact Statemant ie necessary,
Vl-G , - 1. DEV-G6•C
r' ~ ~
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED thet the Anehelm City Planning CcmRission does hereby grent subject
Petltion for Varience, upon the foUowing conditions which are hereby found to be a necessery prerequisite to the pro-
posed use oE the subject property in order tc+ preserve the sefety end generr~l weia:ere ^f the Citizr.,~s of the ~Ity of
i,~aheim:
(1) That the owner(s) of subject property shall deed to the City of Anaheim a strip
of land 45 feet in width from the centerline of the street along Raymond Avenue and a atrip
of 1.and 53 feet in width from the centerline of the street along Orangethorpe Avenue for
street widening purposes.
(2) That the owner(s) of subject pro,~~rty shall pay to the City of Anaheim the sum of
$2.Q0 per front foot along Raymond Avenne for street lighting purposes.
(3) That the final parking plan shall be approved by Che Develapment Services Depart-
ment, and any landscaped areas in the parking area ehall be proCected with six-irch high
concrete curbs, and concrete wheel stops ahall be ~rovided for parking spaces.
(4) That a landscape plan for subject property shall be submitted to the Development
Seryices Department for review and approval. Any decision made by the Development Services
Department on said plan may be appealeti to the Planning Commission and/or City Council.
(5) That subject property shall be developed substantially in ataordance w3th plane
and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim marked Ex.hibit No. 1.
(6) That Conditicn Nos. 1 and 2, above mentioned, shall be complied with prior to the
commencement of the activity authori~ecl under this resolution, or pr•:.or to the time that the
building permit is issued, or within a period of one yeat from date hereof, whichever occura
first, or auch further time as the Plarining Commission may grant.
(7) That Condition Nos. 3, 4, ancl 5, aboce mentioned, ahall be complied with prior to
final l,uilding and zoning inspections.
THE FOREGOING RBSOLUTION is si~ed iu:d approved by me thl.a 25th day of October, 1973.
AT~'EST:
~~~~~~•.~ (~u,Pit
CHAIRMAtti ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSIOc
~~ZZ~~ r=--
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CTTY PLANNItdG COMMISSION
STATE OF CAL,IFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) se.
CITY OF ANA}IEItA 7
I, Ann Krebs~ Secretery of the Cit}~ Plenning Commission of the City of Aneheim, do hereby certify thet
the foregoing :asalu:fon wss paesed end edopted at n meeting of the City Plenning Commission o(the Clty oE Aneheim,
held on October 15, 1973, at 2:00 o'clxk P.M., by the following vote o£ the members thereoE:
AYES; COMMISSIONERS: FARANO, GAUER, KING, RO4TLAND, ~EYMOUR.
NOE:I: COMMISSIONERS: NONE.
ASSP;NT: COMMISSIONERS: ALLRED, HERBST.
IN W'TNESS WHEREOF, 6 heve hereu~to set my hend this 25th day of October, 1973.
RESOLUTION N0. PC73••234
___1~IC'.'~~~L~~' -` ~ --
SECREI'/iRY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
V2-G -2-