PC 73-247~ ~
RESOLUTION NO. rCl3°24I
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY PLANNING COM~dISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
THAT PETITION FOR VARIANCE NO. 2562 BE GRANTED
WHEREAS, the City Plenning Commission oE the City of Aneheim did ceceive a verified Petition for Variance
from ALBERi AND E?ARUKO UPI{V0, 2420 Wes~ 6rcadway, Ar.aha:my Califcr^ia 92804, Ow^ers;
FQi.EY CONSTRUCTION COMPA4Y, ?681 West Broa~way, 5•.:tte I, Arahe::s, California 92802,
Age~;t of certair reaT property situated ?'~ r~,= CEt~~~ or A~ahei;~n, Co_r,ty of Orange, State
~f Califoraia described as T'~e Ncrt`~ 369.00 .'e~_ of the east 79.00 feet of the nerth-
west q::a-ter of th=_ ;:o: tF:west. vcarte; of sectich 7~ to,~nship 4 sau:h, rarge i0 west,
:r. t:^e Ra-;cro Los Coyot~s, as the -crt`,west qca~tEr of said sect?on is i~dicated cn
a nap filed ir. book ~1 pag_ 38 0` rec:.r~ or s~.~ ~:~ys, in r.?;e c`; ice of Lhe Co~rcy
Rec.:dar of said ccur~.ry
; end
WHEREAS, the City Plenning Commission did hold e public hearing at the City tlall in the City of Anaheim
on Nc•,'em:,e- i 2, i 9i 3 at 2:00 o'clock P.M., notice of seid public hearing having been duly given as required
by low and in acrnrdance with the provisions of the Maheim Municipel Code, Chepter 18.68, to hear and consider evi-
dence for end agein~t seId proposed varience end to investigete end meke findings and recommendntions in connection
therewith; and
WHEREAS, said Commission, after due inspection, investigetion, end study mede by itselE end in its behelf,
end eEter due rnnsideration of all evidence end repnrts oEEered et said hearing, does find end detertnine the following
facts:
1. That the petitioner requests e veriance from the Anaheim MunIcipe: Coda as fol lows to s~:~dlv ide
s;:-;ec. FroP~_.ty ~r,te `;v•: (5) icts deva ~p~e.._ wi!!t sir,~ple••famiiy i'~c~:es.
!
a. SEC-lON 98.26.050(3-a) ~ M1•, -_- 4uZ'idlr.5 s1te. (~,000 square `ooi s?~e
reqar:ed; 4,938 s4~are fcct s+t~ proposed for
2 cf .t:e :ots).
~. SEC7~ON 18.26.0 0( - Ma;'~~` `.~t~c-;'r~ „t-age. (~5% p~=:-mi*_ted; 8% a.~d ~'1~
p:~_: ~s ~1
z. `~~~lst ils"ere sre excep+tlOAat nF EX~~+eordinary «:i~curtlrstdtl~xs oc~ ~:g7,~illo~{!~'appl{cable to the property involved
or to the intended use rE tj,~~ ~1R;pN_~`,?Y that do ;~e$ npply k~-,L~IBte17y fE ~~e pmperty or dass of use in the seme vicinity end
zone.
3. '!' aet the :equer :ed va~i~!?c''- (' ress~cy l.cet U~e pres,r.rvecion ond enjayment of a substential property right
possessed by otheac property in the s~q;;,~ K~,, y ANd ;~o~,e, enr;.a ~6,~,,;;d to the property in question.
4. ~a;~ d~r. requested v~.ti@nEi~' VWtI~ noot ~ fi~iNJ~~~@~l~ detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to thc prop-
erty or improveesnnts.~i11 su~h vl[1nl~y atu9'~one in tvti~ic~h ~ti Propeity is located.
5. Tnat dv~ *o t!~~e ~:t~tsuvl epc-+ '` tF,e na-~~?, it wc~1d te extre~~.ly di,`Tic.it to
su~~ivi~e suLJec;' P::?n~-cy ar.o ae.;~=;::~, ~ acr,:~¢~ar._<, wit`: tl-,s s;te deveicp:~er:~ star.dards
cf the requested i~'ie.
6. Tha` the wa''ve:•s , q::~;5`~c w=;~ dete:•-~,?:.ed ^o: tc be of s~~f:clent sig;.tr:ca:.~e
to a`fe~t t"eyadJoir,~;.y 'a-.d ::ses.
Vl-G . .1. oev-!:e.•:
. ~ ~
EUV ! RONMENTAL i MPAGT REPORT F IND ING: ......~«.ti..: r ..,~ _.
. .~-- ..~... ' '. . . . '
Thct the Planning CommgssFon, 1n~connectlon with an Exemption Declaretion Status request,
finds znd determioes'79Sat the p~posa~ woul<...have no significant environmental tmpact and,
therPfore, recommends tothe City Council that no Ertvironmental Impact Statement is nec-
essary.
i~OW, THEREFORE, BE iT RESOLNED that the A;,a~aim City Pla~^i;:g Cemm:ssio.^. does hprn5y
grant subject Petitio~ for Variance, upon tFe following conditions w!;icfi are hereby fou;,d
to be a recessary prerequisite to the proposed use of the su:ject property i~ o;der tc
prese-ve the safety ar:d ger,eral wsifare of the C;tize^s of the City of Anaheim:
{ti) 7hat this Va;iarce is grant:d subie.:t to the completion of Reclassificatlo~
~~. 73~i4~24, now perdi7g.
(2} That subject property s~ali be deve'.oped substantially in accorda~ce witfi plans
and spectfic~cions on fiie ~vith the City of Anaheim marked Exhibit Nos. 1, 2, ard 3.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is signed and npproved by me this 215t day of November, 1973.
ATTEST:
CJ~J
/ / Z ~ %'0 l/L7
CHAIRMAN ANAHE[M CITY PLANNING COMMISSIO~
~
~~l~Iil-t % ~
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) s8•
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, A;t~ Krebs, Secretury of the City Planning Commission of the City of Aneheim, do hereby certiEy thnt
the toregoing resolution wes passed and adopted et e mectlng ot the City Plenning Commission oE the City of Anaheim,
held on Novembe~ 12v 1973, at 2:00 o'clock P.A1., by the (ollowing vote of the membcrs thcreof:
AYES: COMMISSIGNERS: ALLRED, FARANO, GA:1ER, KiNG, ROWLANO.
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE.
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: HERBST, Sf_YMOUR,
IN WITNESS WHEREOr, I heve heceunto aet my hend thts 27 st day oi November ~ 1973.
RESOLUTION NQ. PC7~-747
~~~~~~~ _
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNIN:; COMMISSION
V2-G -Z'