Loading...
PC 73-250RESOLUTIOI~1. PC73-250 ~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM THAT PETITION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT _1435.-BE . GRANTED WHEREAS, the Ciiy ?lanning Commission of the City of Anaheim did receive e verified Petition for Con- ditional Use Permit from B.W. AND MARCELLA V. WATERS, 1118 Highland, Newport Beach, California 92660, Owners; KNUDSON/MILES, 17731 Irvine Soalevard, Suite 103, Tustin, California 92680, Agent o£ certain real property situated in the City o£ Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California, described as Beginning at the Southwest corner of said Parcel 1; thence North 0° 02''12" West 259,05 £eet along the Westerly line of said Parcel 1 to the Southerly line of Colchester Drive; thence North 89° 57' 48" East 124.33 feet along the Southerly line of Colchester Drive to the Easterly line of said Parcel 1; thence South 0° 40' 06" West along the said Easterly line attd.its Southerly prolongation 259.04 feet to a point on the Southerly line of said Parcel 1; thence South 89° 57° 27" West 121.14 feer along the said Southerly line to the point of be- ginning ; end WHEREAS, the City Plenning Commission did hold e public hearing at the City i3e11 in the City of Aneheim on November 26, 1973~ at 2:00 o'clock P.M., notice of seid public hearing having been duly given es cequiced by law and in accocdance with the provisions of the Aneheim Municipel code, Chapter 18.64, to hear and consider evidence fot end egeinst seid pcaposed conditional use end ta investigete and make findings and recommendations in connection therewith; end WHEREAS, sa'sd Commission, eEter due inspection, investigation, and study mede by itselE and in its be- half, end aEter due consideration of ell evidence and ceports offeced at seid hearing, does find end determine the following facts: 1. Thet the proposed use is pmpecly one for which a Conditionel Use Pe;mit is euthorized by Code Section 18.64.020(3)(j-6) to establieh an outdoor recreational facility, including batting cages aud trampolines. 2. That the petitioner is desirous of expanding tne requested use to include tenr.is mechines at a future time. 3. That the petitioner stipulated that hours of operation would not extend beyoad 10:00 p.m. 4. Thet the netitioner stipulated to directing all proposed lighting dow:aaerd so as to minimize the undesirable Itghting effects on the su~rounding residentiel devefopmer.ts. 5. That the petitioner stipulated to limiting the uses to the plans and specifica- tions, as sabmitted. 6. That the proposed use will not adversely affect the ad,joining land uses and the ~rowth and deveiopu-~aat of the area in which it is proposed to be located. 7. That the size and shape of the site proposed for the use is adequste to a11ow the full development of the proposed use in a manner not detrimental to the part•lcular area nor to the peace, health, safety, and general welfare of the Citizeas of the City of Anaheim. 8. That the granting of L•he Conditional Use Permit under the condi~iona imposed, if any, wi11 not be detrimental to the peace, health, safety, and general welfare of the citizena of the City of Anaheim. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FINDING: That the Planning Commission, in connectton with an Exemption Declarat~.on Status req~estY finds and determiaes that the proposal would "nave no significant environmental impsct and, therefore, recommends to the City Council that no Enviroamental Impact Statement is necea- sary. -1- ~ ~ NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED thet the Anaheim City Planning Cumcnission does hereby grant suUject Petition for Conditional Use Permit, upon the follotoing conditions which are hereby found to be a necessary prerequisite to the proposed use of the subject properky in order to preserve the safety and general welfare of the Citizens of the City of Anaheim: (I) That any signing proposed for subject property shali be in conformance with the Sign Ordinance. (2) TSat the hours of operation shall not extend to beyond 10:00 p.m., as stipulated to by the petitioner. (3) TY~at all proposed lighting shall be directed downward so as to min:mize the un- desirable lighting effects on surrounding resiuential developments, as stipuYated to bp the petitioner. (4) That street lighting facilities along Colchester Drive shall be instaliad as re- quired by the Director of Public Utilities and in accordance with standard plans ~nd speci- fications on file in the affice of the Director of Pnblic Utilities; and that a bond in an amount and form satisfactory to the City of Anaheim shall be posted with the City to guaran- tee the insta~lation of the above mentioned requirements. (5) That trash storage areas shall be pr.ovided in accordance with appro~~ed pZans on file with the office of the Director of Public Works. (6) That f3re.hydrants sha11 be installed and charged as required and determined to be nacessary by the Chief of the Fire Department prior to commencement ~f structural £raming. (7) That subject property shall be served by underground utilities. (8) That drainage of subject property shnll be disposed of in a manner satisfectory Co the City Engineer. (9) That the final parking plan shall be approved by the Development Services Depart- ment, and any landscaped areas in the parking area sha11 be protected with six-inch high, concrete curbs, and concrete wheel stops shall be provided for parking spaces, (10) That appropriate water asaessment fees as determined by the Director of Public Utilities shall he paid to the City of Anahsim pri:or to the issnance of a building permit. (11) That subject property shall be.developed substantially in accordance with plans and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim marked Exhibit Nos, 1, 2 and 3, includ- ing the possible expansion of tennis machines, as proposed, may be permitCed. (12) That Condition No. 4, above mentioned, shall be complied with prior to the com- mencement of the activity.authorized under this resolution or.prior ~o the time that the building permit is issued, or. w~thin a period of one year from date hereof, whfchever occurs first, or such further time as the Planning Commiasion may grant. (13) That Condition Nos. 1, 3, 5, 7, $, 9,and 11, above mentioned, shall be complled with prior to final building and zoning inspections. THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is signed and approved by me this 6th day of Dec~ber, 1973. // ~lP l/t~'o1/~~~~./p~_ CHAIRMAN AN?.HEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION ATTEST: • ~~.Z.`t~u ~~aJ/~ ~t~,vC~>.~ / SECRETARY PRQ TEM ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSTON STATE Or CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss. CITY OP AN.4HEIM ) I, Patricia Scanlan, Secretary pro tem of the City Planning Commisaion of the City of Anaheim, do hereby certify that'the foregoing reaolution was passed and adopted et a meeting of the City Planning Commisslon of the City of Anaheim, held on Ncvember 26, 1973, at 2:00 o°clock p.m., by the following vote of the members thereoE: AYES: COMMISSYONERS: ALLRED, FARANO, GAUER, I~RBST, KING, ROWLAND, SEYMOUR. NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE. ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE. IN WITNESS 4iEIEREOr, I have hereunto set my hand this 6th dey of Decemher, 1973. ~~~ c:I,GU~ ~ L! r~xJ SECRETARY PRO TEM ANAAEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION N0. PC73-250 'Z"