PC 73-29~ " ~ ~
RESULUTION NO. PC73-29
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION OF TNE CITY OF ANAHEIM
THAT PETITION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT N0. ~~~- SE GRANTED
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commissien of the'City of Anaheim did ceceive a verified Petition for Conditional
Use Pecmitfrom DUNN PROPERTIES CORPORATION, 2009 East Edinger Avenue, Santa Ana, California
92702, Cwner; WTLLIAM B. BURKE, in care of Ashvill-Burke and Company, 8i00 Garden Grove
Boulevard, Garden Grove, California 92644, Agent of cextain real property situated in the
City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California, described as That portion of the
East half of the Northeast quarter of the Northeast quarter of Section 26, Township 4 South,
Range 10 West, as said aection is shown on a map thereof recorded in book 51, page 10, Mis-
cellaneous Maps, records of said Orange County, and more particularly described as Parcel 2
on a map recorded in book 47, page 28 of ?arcel Mapa, records of said Orange County
; and
WHEREAS, the City. Planning Commission did hold a public hearing et the City Hall in the City of Anaheim on
February 5, 1973~ et 2:00 o'clock P.M., notice of said public heacing heving been duly given as requiced by
law end in ecwrdance with the provisions of the Aneheim Municipal code, Chapter 18.64, to hear and consider evidence
Eor end egair.st seid proposed conditionel use and to investigete end meke E'indings end recommendetians in connection
therewlth; and
WHEREAS, said Commission, e[ter due inspection, investigetion, and study made hy Itself end in its behalf, and
after due consideration of ell evidence end ceports ofEered et seid heeeing, does find and determine the following facts:
1. That the pmposed use is pmpecly one foc which a Conditional Use Pecmlt is authorized by Code Section
18.52.050(2-b} to wit: establish a real estate office serving primerily commerce and indus-
try.
2, That the proposed use will not advecsely affect. the adjoining land nses end the growth end development of
the erea in wh9ch it`•s proposed to be loceted.
3. That tha size end shape of the site proposed for the use is adequate to ellow the full development of the
pmposed use in e manaer not detrimentel to the perticuler erea noc io the peace, health, sefety, end general welEere of
the Citizens of the City of Aneheim.
4. Thet the grantin~ of the Conditional Use Pecmit under the condiUons imposed, if any, will not be detrimental
to the peace, health, safety, end general welfare of the Citlzens of the City of Anaheim.
5. That the petitioner. stipulated to submisaion of plana for Plannt.ng Commiasion
approval in the event the corporaCe office headquarters was propoaed to expand into the
wnrehouse structure.
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FINDING:
That the Planning Commiasion, in connection with an Exemption Declaration Statua request,
finds and determines that the propoeal wouid have no aignificanC environmental impact and,
therefore, recommende to the City Council that no Environmental Impact Statement is necea-
sary.
Cl-G ~ 1
~ ~
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED thet the Anehelm City Plenning Commisslon does heceby ~cant subject
Petition for Condltionel Use Permit, upon the to!lbwing conditions which nre hereby Eound to be a necessery pcerequlsite
to the proposed use of the subject pcoperty in ocder to preseive the sefety end general welfere of the Citlzens oEthe
City of Aneheim:
(1) That the sidewalks shall Ue installed along State College Boulevard as rEquired
by the City Engineer and in accordance with standard plans and apecifications on file in the
office of the Cit} Engineer.
(2) That trash storage areas shall be provided in accordance with approved plans on
file with the office of the Director of Public Worka.
(3) That fire hydrants shall be installed and charged as required and determined to
be necessary by the Chief of the Fire Department prior to commencement of structural framing.
(4) That all air conditioning facilities ahall be properly shielded from view, and
the sound buffered from adjacent properties.
(5) That subject property shall be served by underground utilities.
(6) That drainage of subject property shall be disposed of in a manner that is satis-
factory to the City Engineer.
(7) That subject property shall be developed substantially in accordance with plans
and specifications on file with the~City of Aneheim marked Exhibit Nos. 1, 2, and 3.
(8) That Condition Nos. 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, and 7, abuve mentioned, shall be complied with
prior to final building and zoning inspectiona.
(9) That in the event the petitiolansdfor saideexpansiondahallcbepsubmittedito andd
quartera into the warehouse structure, p
appraved by the Planning Commiasion, as stipulated to by the petitioner.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is signed and eppcoved by me this
ATTEST:
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUN':Y OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
1973.
I, Ann Krebs, Seccetery of the City Plenning Commisslon of the City of Anehein, do heceby certlfy that
the foregoing resolution was passed en eL ~ o' lodc P.M.n by he fo liowing vote o the members thereof•ty oE Anehetm.
held on February 5, 1973,
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: ALLtcED, GAUER, HERBST, KAY4100D, SEYMOUR.
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE,
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: FARANO, ROWLAND.
IN WITNESS WHF.REOF, I have hereunto set my hend this 15th day of February, 1973.
SECRETARY ANAHEIM C1TY PLANNING COMMISSION
RESOLUTION ti0. PC73-29
C2~G ~2~ .