PC 73-37~
~
~
RESOLUTIQN N0.
~
PC73-37
A RESOLUTION OF THE C1TY PLANNING COMDIISSION QF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
THAT PETITION FOR VARIANCE NO. 2470 BE G1tANTED
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission of the Ci:y of Anaheim did receive a verified Petition for Variancc from
KE:tMADA CORPORATIQN, c/o of Atlantic Rir_hfield, 1786 West Lincoln Avenue, Ar.aheim,
Ca2ifornia 92804, Owner; P B R COMFANY, 1020 East Vermont Acercue, Anaheim, Califor;~ia
928J5, Agent of certain real properCy situnted in the City of Anahefm, County of Orange,
State of California, described as Parcel 1 as shown on a map filed in Book 45 Page 13,
of Parcel Maos in the office of the County Recorder of said county; and
' WHEREAS, thc City Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at the City Hall in the City of Anahcim an
February 21, ? 973, at 2:00 o clock p.m., notice of said public hearing having becn duly given as required by law and
in accordance with the provisions of thc Maheim Municipal Code, Chapter 18.68, to hcar and consider evidencc for and against said
proposed variance and to investigate and make findings and recommendaUons in conncction therewith; and
WHEREAS, said Commission, aftcr due inspection, investigation, and study made by itself and in ils bchalf, and aftcr due
consideration of nll evidcncc and reports ofCered at said hcaring, does find and determinc thc following facts:
1. Thatthcpetitionerrequests variances.from'the Anaheim Mur..icipal Code as followa:
a. SECTION 18.62.090B(1) - Maximum number of free-stending siKna.
(One permitted; four proposeJ)
b. SECTION 18.62.090B(1) - Minimum distance between free-standinq siRna.
(300 feet required; 40 feet minimum proposed - also
"50 feet and 60 feet)
c. SECTION 18.62.090B(5)_ - Minimum distance of a free-standinR si~n from atut-
ting propertv line, (40% requtred; 27% proposed)
d. SECTION 18.62.100B(1) - Maximum area of a free-standin~, sign. (I00 equare
feet permitted; 152 aquare feet proposed)
2. That the waivers 1-a, 1-U, and 1-c, above menCioned, are hereby granted on the
besis they have been granted in the pest by the City Council.
3. That there are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions appli^able
to the property involved or to the intended use of the property that do not a~ply gene.ally
to tfie property or clasa of uae in the same v±cinity and zone.
4. That the requested variance ia necessary Por the preservation and enjoyment of a
substantial property right possessed by other property•in the same vicinitp and zone, and
denied to the properCy in question. ;~
5. That the requeste8 vatiance will not be materisl:y detrimental •:o Che public wel-
fare or injurfous to the properCy or improvements in such vicinity and zone in which the
property is located.
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FINDING:
ThaL• the Planning C~mmission, in connection with an Exe.mpl•ion Declaration Status requ~ot,
finds and deCermines that the proposel would have no significant environmental impact and,
therefore, recommends to the Ci.ty Council that no Environmental Impact Statement is necessary. ~,
oev-cs•e
-1-
~ ~ ~
NOW, THEREPORE, BE IT RESOLVED thet the Anehelm ~ity Plenning Commission does hereby grent subject
Petition for Varience, upon the following conditions which are hereby found to be e necessary pcerequisite to the pro-
posed use of the subJect property in order to preserve the safety end general welfoce of the ~itizens of the City of
Anaheim:
Aw) That the sidewalks shall be installed along State College Boulevard and Katel].a
,4venue ax required by the City Engineer and in accordance with standard plans and specifica-
Ciona ~n t'?1•^. in the office of the Cit~ Engineer•.
(~.} That the owner(s) of subject property sha21 pay to ~he City cf Ar.aheim the sum of
S2.a0 per fronC fooC along State College Boulevard and Kakelle Avcr.ue for srrect lighting
p'urposea:
(3) That subject sign shall be developed sutlatantially in accordance with plans and
:+pecifications on file with the City of Anaheim marked Ext:ibi: Noc. 1, 2, 3, and 4.
(4) ThaC ndequate clearence of existiug electrical lines ahali Ue provided as reguired
b;~ ':he Electrical Division, Department of Public Utiltties, and the State of California
G.u, 95.
(5) That Condition No, 2, above ca_ntioned, ehall be complled with prior to the com-
meiicement of tlie activity authorized under this reaolution, or prior to the time L-hat the
building pexmit is issued, or within a period of one year from date hereof, whichever occurs
first, or such further time as the Planning Coa¢nission may grant.
(6) That Condition Nos. 1, 3, and 4, above mentioned, shall be complied with prior Yo
final building and zoning inspections.
THE FOREGOING RE50LUTION is et~ed end approved by me this lst day of March, 1973.
~
. G..~
HAIRMAN ANAHEIM CITY PL NING COMMI ON
/! TTEST:
--~~-~,~~.~/
SECRETARY .ANA'diEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
STATE OF CALIE~ 9RlaIh )
COUNTY OF ORANG~ ) as.
CITY OF ANAHEIfif )
I, Ann Krebs, Secretery t,f the City Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim, do hereby certify thet
the foregoing resolution wes pessed and edopted at e meeting of the City Plenning Commission of the City of Anaheim,
held on February 21, 1973~ et 2:00 o'cIock P.M., by ihe [ollowing vote of the members thereof:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: GAUER, HERBST, KAYWOOD, ROWLAND, SEYMOUR.
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ALLRED, FARANO.
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ,
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I heve hereunto set my hend this let day of Merch, I973.
RESOLUTION NO.PC73-37
L:/~ %~~V~'-vC~e/
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
V2-G -2-