PC 73-51• ` RESOLUT~NO. PC73=51 ~
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE C1TY OF ANAHEIM
THAT PETITION FOR VARIANCE NO. 2479 BE GRANTED IN PART
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission of the City of Meheim did receive a verified PeGtion for Vaziance from
JOYAL R. HOBSON, SR., 9342 Centtal Avenue, Garden Grove, Califorr.ia 92641, owner of
certain real property situated in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of
California, described as Lot Nos. 25 and 26 of Smith and Dean's Re-Sub.; and
WHEREAS, the City Plenning Commission did hold a public hearing at the City Hall in the City of Analteim on
t4arch 19, 1973, at 2:00 o'clock p.m., notice of said public lie~ring huving been duly given as requi~ed by law and
in eccordance with the provisions of the Maheim Munic'~al Code, Chapter 18.b8, to hcar and coHsider evidence Cor and against said
proposed variance and to investigate and mnke findings and recommendations in connection therewith; and
WHEREAS, suid Commission, ufter due inspection, investigation, and study made by itself nnd in its behalC, and after due
consideration of all evidence and reports ofCered at said hearing, does fnd and determine the following facts:
1. Thatthepetitionerrequcsts variancea from Che Anaheim Municipal Code as follows;
a. SECTION 18.32.020 - Permitted usea. (Permit a use (office) that is not
pe:-mitted,in the.R-3 Zone)
b. SEC'I'ION 18.62.155(a)_ - Permitted ait~n. (One S-aquare foot aign may be per-
mitted for commercial use of a residential atructure;
pne 12-syuare f.oot free-standing sign propoaed)
c. SECTION 18_.04.030 - Minimum number of required parkinQ apaces. (7 saacea
required; 5 spaces propoaed and existing)
2, That the peCit•ioner proposes to legalize an existing use on aubject• property.
3. 'Phat Waivers 1-a and 1-c, above mentioned, are hereby granted on the besis that the
petitioner stipulated thaC 99% af the businesa is conducted by telephone.
4. ThaC Waiver 1-b, above mentioned, is hereby danied on the basis Chat since the major
purtion of the business ia conducL•ed by telephone, a sign, as presentiy existe, would be un-
necessary and that the petitioner then atipulat~d to reducing the eign to that eize permitCed
by L•he sign ordinance (8 square feet).
5. That there are exceptional or exCraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable
t•o the properCy involved or to the intended use of the property, as ~ranted, that do not
apply generally to the property or class of use in the same vicinity and zone.
6. TheC the requested variance, as granted, is necessary for the preservation and en-
joyment of a substanL•ial property right possessed by other property in the same vicinity and
zone, and denied Co Che prop~rty ir. question.
-1-
CEV-66-E
` ~ ~
7, That the requested variance, as granted, will not be materialYy detrimental to
tt~e public welfare or injurious to the property or improvementa in such vicinity and zone
•ln which the property is located.
LNVIRONMEtv'TAL IMPACT REPORT FINDING:
That the Planning Commission, in connection with an Exemption Declaration Status request,
finds and determines that zhe proposal would have no significant environmental impact, and
therefore, recommends to the City Council that no Environmental Impact Statement ia necea-
sary.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT'RESOLVED thaC the Anaheim City Planning Commisaion does hereby •
grant, in parC, subject Petition for Vartance, upon the following conditions which are
hereby found to be a necessary prerequisite to the proposed uae of the subject property in
order to preserve the safety and general welfare of the Citizens of the City of Anaheim:
(1) That the existing structui~e shall be brought up to the minimum standarde of
the City of Anaheim, including the Uniform Building, Plumbing, Electrical,
Housing, Mechanical and Fire Codes, as adopted by the City of Anaheim.
(2) That subject property shall be developed subatantially in accordance with plans
and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim marked Exhibit I~os. 1, 2,
3, and 4 provided, however, that the existing sign shall be removed and any
future signing shall not axceed eight square feet as required by the Sign Ordin-
ance.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is signec
A'PTEST :
SECRETARY ANANEIM CT.TY PLANNING COMIliSSION
STATE OF CALIFORNTA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) 88•
CITY OT ANAIiEIM )
I, Ann Kreba, Secretary of ~he City Planning Cormniaeion of Ct~e City of Anaheim, do
hereby certify that the foregoing reaolution wae passed and adopted at e meeting of Che
City Planning Commiesion of the City of Anaheim, held on March 19, 1973, at 2:00 p.m.,
by the following vote o: the members thereof:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: ALLRED, FARANO, GAUER, KA.YWOOD, ROF3LAND, SEYMOUR.
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE.
ABSENT: COMMISSIOPIF.RS: HERBST.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto aet my hand this 24L•h day of March, 1973.
SPCRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
RESOLUTION N0. PC73-51 -2"