PC 73-54'•' ~• RESOLUTION ~ PC73-54 ~
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
THAT PETITIUN,FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT ~~~q BE ~g(~pITED
WHEREAS, the City Plenning ~ommission of the City of Anahe'sm did ceceive a verified Petitioa for Con-
ditional Use Permit Ecom DOUG BROWNE, 967 AmbridgE Avenue, Anaheim, California 92806, Owner
df certain real property situated in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of
California, described as Lot 3 of Tract 2300~ as shown on a map thereof recorded in
Book 68, Pages 35 and 36 of Miscellaneous Maps, in the office of the County Recorder
of said Orange County
; and
WHEREAS, the CityPlenning Commission did hold a public hearing al the CityHall in the City of Anaheim
on March 19, 1973, at 2:00 o'clock P.~7., notice of said public hearing having been duly given
a~ cequiced by law and in accocdence with the provisions of the Anaheim Municipel code, Chepter 18.64, to hear
and consider evidence for and against said pcoposed conditionel use and to investigate and make findings end
recommendations in connection therewith; e~id
WHEREAS, seid Commission, after due inspection, investigation, end study mede by itseif end in its'br
half, and after due couside:ation of all evidence and reports offered at said hearing, does find and de[ermine the
following facts:
1. That the proposed use is pmperly one for which a Conditional Use Permit is authorized by Code : Section
18.40.050(e) ~o ~vit: establish retail sales and repair of musical in~truments ard also
for a studio for giving musio lessons in two exis~ing residences, with waivers of:
(a) SECTION 18.40.070(2-e-5) - Minimum side setbaok from an "R" Zone.
(10 feet required; 7 and 9 feet existing)
(b) SECTION 18.40.070(3-a) - Maximum 'bui;lding height wi.thin 150 feet
of an "R" Zone. (3 feet high permittod
at 7 feet from "R" Zone; 10~ fr~et high
ezisting)
2. That Waivers 1-a and 1-b, above mentioned, aro hereby granted so long as the
single family resi.dences ara used for the req~xested use, and said •~vai.vers shall teY~-
minate if and when the residences are removed and a commercial structure is constructed
on tha basis that the buildings were already in existence.
3. That the proposed use as gr~znted v~ill not advarsely affect the adjoining land
izse5 and the growth and development of the aree in vihich it is proposed i;o be located.
4. That the size and shape of the site proposed for the use is adoquate to allovr •
the full development of the proposed use r~s gr•anted in a manner not detrimentaZ to the
particular ares nor t•o the peace, health, saPety, and general welfare of the Citizons
of the City of Anaheim.
5. That the granting of the Conditional Uee Permit under the conditions imposed,
if any, will not be detrimental to the pesoe, health, safety, and general welfare af
the Citizens of the City of Anaheim.
6. That one person appeared in opposition, and a petition signed by 6 persons
was received, all in opposition.
ENVIRON[vfENTAL IMPACT REPORT FINDING:
That the Planning Commission, in connection with an Exemption Declaration Status request,
finds and determines that the proposal would have no significant onvironmental impact,
and therefore, recommends to the City Council that no Environmental Impact Statement is
necessary.
-i-
.. ,~ ~ ~
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Plenning Commission does hereby grant/subject
Petition for Conditional Use Permit, upon the [ollowing conditions which are hereby Eound to be a necessary prerequisite
to the proposed use of the subject pcoperty in ordec to pcesecve the seEety end genecal welfare of the Citizens of the
City of Aneheim:
(1) lhat thi~ conditional use permit is granted subject to the completion of Re-
r,lassification No. 72-73-37, now pending.
(2) That specific plans for any proposed development or remodeling on the property
st~all be submitted to the Planning Commission and City Council for approval prior to the
intY•aduction of an ordinanca rezoning the property Yor commercial uses.
(3) That prior to final bui].ding and zoning inspec~ions, the petitioner shall pro-
vide adequate sound attenuation devices in the structure to eliminate a noise nuisanco
Ueing created by the proposed musical activity.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is signed and epproved by me this 29~h day f rch, 1.973.
~ ~
ANAHEIM
ATTEST:
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, Ann Krebs, Secretary of the City Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim, do l~ereby certify that
the [oregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting of the City Planning Commission cf the City of Anaheim,
held on alarch 19, 1973, at 2:00 o'clodc P.M., by the following vote of the members thereof:
AYES: CUMMISSIONERS: Allred, Farano, iierbst, Kaywood, Rowland, Seymour.
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: Gauer.
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: None.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I heve hereunto set my hand this 29th day of bfwz•ah, 19i3.
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
RESOLUTION N0. PC73-54
C?.G ' 2"