PC 73-82~ ~
RESOLUTION N0. ' PC73-82
A RESOLUTION OF THE CI'TY PLANNING r~OMMI5SI0N O 1391 CITY OF ANAHEIM
THAT PETITION FOR CONDITIONAL LTSE PERMIT BE DENIED
WF~EREAS, the City Planning Commission of the City of Aneheim did receive e verified Petition Eor Con-
ditional Use Pecmit from ISLAMIC SOCIETY, 243 Jusnita Way, Placentia, California 92670,
Owner; SAFAA E. BAVATI, 2154 Nowell Aveaue~ Rowland Heights, California 91748, Agent
of certain real property situated in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of
California described as That portion of Lot 1 of Tract No. 58, Peralta Hills Tract'
No. 1, as shown on mep recorded in Bo'ok 10; Page 6 of Miscelianeous Maps, in the of-
fice of the County Recorder of saxd county, acquired by the State of California by
Portion B of Parre2 1 of Final Order of Condemnation, S,C.C. No. 158978, recorded in
Boak 9154, Page'945 of Offi:cia3 Records in:said office
; and
WHEREAS, the City Plenning Commissior, did hold a public heacing at the City Hall in the City of Aneheim
on April 30, 1973, at Q:00 o'clock P.M., notice of said public hearing having been duly given
as cequired by law and in accordance with the provisions of the Maheim Municipel code, Chepter 18.64, to hear
end consider evidence for and egainst said proposed conditionel use end to investigate and meke findings end
recommendetions in connection therewith; end
WHEREAS, said Commission, after due inspection, investigation, and study made by itself and in its br
helE, and aEter due consideretion of all evidcnce end reports offered at said hearing, does find end determine the
following fects:
1. Thet the propased use is properly one Eoc '.r'• : r, a;:c?~altional Use Permit is authorized by COde . •. .
Section 15.64.020(2.-c) to wit: establ?sh > "cu and cultural and social activities
center with waiver of:
SECTION 18.37.030(E-1-d) -'';,~i•~~r~m~u~~~er of requircd parking opaces.
.t;41 K~~:es required; 10 apaces proposed)
2. That the City of Anaheim, upon annexation of the Peralta Hills area made an
agreement to retain said area in its rurai residential atmosphere, and the proposed
use would be a non-residential use encroaching into this area.
3. That in order to maintain the integrity of the City of Anaheim and to insure
that the good faith of its citizens is retained, the &nnexation agreement made by the
City to the residents should be honored.
4. That under City Council Policy No. 207, residents of the Peralta Hills area
were assured that the residential amenil•ies of the area would be retained by not re-
quiring the standard city curbs and gutters for streets; nowever, with the use pro-
posed, on-street parking could be anticipated, which would be extremely hazardous in
this area where streets are considerably narrower than standard City streets.
5. That the land uses of the area have not chaaged since the Planning Commiasion
previously denied a church use in May, 1972, in the Peralta Hills to warrant favorable
consideration of the proposed request.
6. That the size and shape of the site is not adequat~e because of topography and
terrain to allow the full development of the proposed use in a mannar not detrimental.
to L•he particular area nor Co th~ peace, health, safety, and general welfare of the
citizens of the City of Anaheim.
CI-D " 1 "
~ ~
7. That the proposed uce will adversely affect the adjoining land usea and the
growith and development of the are2 in which it is proposed to be located. '
8. That two !2) persons appaared representing 35 persons present in the Council
Chamber, all in opposition to subject petition.
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FINDING:
That the Planning Commission, in connection with an Er.emption Declaration Status re-
quest, finds and determines that the proposal would have no significant environmental
impact,and, therefore, recormnends to the City Council that no Environmental Impact
Statement is necessary.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED thet the Aneheim City Planning Commission does hereby deny subject
Petition fox Conditionel Use Pertnit on the besis of the aforementioned findings.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTiON is signed end approved by me thi~ lOth day ~May, 1973.
CITY
ATTEST:
/~!/J?/J~C'~ i~' `~!" v _
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
CGUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss•
CtTY OF ANAHEIM )
I, Ann Krebs, Secretary of the City Plenning Commiesion of the Ciry oE Maheim, do hereby certify that the fo:e-
going resolution wes pessed nnd adopted et e meeting of Ehe City Plenning Commission of the City of pneheim, held on
April 30, 1973 at 2:00 o'clock P.M., by the~folloming vote of the members thereof:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: ALLR~D, FARANO, GAUER, HERBST, KAYWOOD, ROWLAND, SEYMOUR.
NOES: COMMIS$IONERS: NONE.
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE:
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 10t1i day of May, 1973.
RESOLUTION N0. pC73-82
~~'~/~Y~
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMYSSION
C2-D -Z'