PC 73-88~•w
~ ~
RESOLUTION NO
PC73-sa
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
THAT PETITION FOR VARIANCE N0. 249~ BE GRANTED
WHEREAS, the City Plenning Commission of the City oE Anaheim did ceceive e verified Petition for Varience
from LOUIS L. NEUMAN, 1111 Wese Lincoln Avenue, Anaheim, California 92805, Owner of certain
real property situated in the City of Anaheim~ County of Orange, State of California, des-
cribed as Lot Nos. 22, 23, 24, and 25, of Block 4 of the•Oppenheimer'and Sumiaetfield Sub-
division as recoriled in Miscellaneous Records of Los Angelea County, Book 19, Page 44
; and
WHEREAS, Lhe City F~lanning Commission did hold e public hearing at the City Hall in the City of Aneheim
on April 30, 1973, at 2:00 o'clock P.M., notice of said public hesring i.?ving been duly given as required
by law and in eccordence with the provisions oE the Aneheim Municipel Code, Chapt~~r 18.68,to hearend canslder
evider.ce for and u~ainst said proposed varience end to investigate and meke findings an~9 recommendations in connec-
tion therewith; end
WHEREAS, seid Commissinn, efter due inspection, investigati~n, and study made by itself end in its behalf,
and after due consideration of all evidence and reports offeced et rseid hearing, does find and determine the following
(acts: ~ ~
1. Thet the petitioner reauests a variance from the Aneheim Municipnl Code as follows:
SECTION 18.44.010 - Permitted uses. ".(To"allow expansion of a nonconforming
auto ~epair garage.
2. That the petitioner pr~poses te develop an office and storage addition to the exist-
ing automobile repair shop.
3.. That there are exceptional or extreordinary ciccumstences or conditions applicable to the property involved
or to the intended use of the property that do not apply generally to the property or class of use in the same vicinity
and zone.
4.• That the cequested variance is necessery for the preservation and,enjoyment of e substentiel prope~ty right
possessed by other property in the same vicinity end zone, and denie~ to the propedy in question.
5'.. That the requested varience will not be metecially detrimentel to the public welfete or injurious to the prop-
ehy or impcavements in such vicinity and zone in which the property is loceted.
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FINDING:
That the Planning Comm:ssion, i:n.connection with an Exemption Declaration Status requesl•,
finds and determines that the proposal would have no significant environmental impact and,
therefore, recommends to the City Council that no Environmental Impact Statement is necessary.
V1-G -i-
l' p~ ~
~
NOW, THEREFORE, BF IT RESOLVED that the Aneheim City Planning Commisslnn ~oea heczby grant ar,bJec1
Petition for Variance, upon the following conditions which are hereby taund to be a nece5sey prerequisite to t~;.e pm-
posed use cf the subject pcopecty in o:der to preserve the safety and generel welfare of cne ~i2izens ofthe ~l:y of
Aneheim: .
(1) That the owner(s) of subject property ehal'1 de~ed Co the City of Anahei:: a strir
of land te« feet in width from the centetl.ine uf Che ~lLzy a7.org the a1Zey to the no.rtL ~:or
alley wi8~ninZ; pur}sfl~es.
(2} Th.at ti:~ e~i:.'tin~ stru:.zurc 3~<<e,:i rr Na'~~.i~ht up to the m5_~imurL ~:'~3'.Wards of the
City O£ AfiAiSc ;;~;:; Z~i~:~;~~tYY'o' t;l~ 'Jr.f £~~! n'~~S.~ic3g, i~;umi::.zg, Electr:F,t~': 7., '14r. .:sire:~, Mechaniaal
and Fire Codes as adopted by the City of ~:z.F;f:~~~.
(3) That trash storage nrr~o ehal]. he provided iix ac,s~;~ri:~;nce wicla •,-nnrov~J ;~': =';~ on
file raith the office of the D~rer.se3• of °aklis Warka.
(4) That all air conditioniitg fa.^,ilities shall be properly sk~>~^uded itom :~'~"''~r ~nn!,
the sound bu£ferec~ from adjacent pronerties.
(5) That the final parking plan sha1Z be approved by the Developmzmt uervices Depart-
ment, and any landscaped areas in the perking area shall be protected with six-inch hfgh
concrete curbs, and concrete wheel stops shall be provided for parking spices.
(6) That subject property shall be developed substantially in accordance with plans
and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim,.marked Exhibit Nos. 1 and 2.
(7) That Condition No. 1, above mentioned, shall be complied with prior to the
commencement of the'activity autharized under this resolution, or prior to the time that
the building permit is issued or within a period of one year from date hereof, whichever
occurs fir.st, or such further time as the Planning Commission may grant. .
(8) That Condition Nos. 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6, above mentioned, shall be complied with
prioL to final building and zoning inspections.
TFiE FOREGOING RESOLU'lION !s signed and spproved by me thia 1~ day of I~ 1973.
ANAHEIM CITY
ATTEST:
/i~~/ %~~ e+c.~"~~
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) gs•
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, Ann Krebs, Secretary of the Ciiy Planning Commission of the City of Aneheim, do heceby certify that
the foregoiag cesolution wes passed end adopted at a meeting of the City Planning Commission ofthe City of Anaheim,
held an April 30, 1973, et 2:00 o'clock P.M., by the iollowing vote of the menbecs thereoE:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: ALLRED, FAitANO, GAUER, HERSST, KAYWOOD, ROWLAND, SEYMOUR.
I3~ES: CQMMiSSIONERS: NONE.
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have heceunto set my hand thi.s lOth day of Mey, 1973.
RESOLUTION NO.PC73-88
~i2~ / /" ~=~
SECRETARY AN~HEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSTON
V2-G "Z-