PC 73-93~ ~
RESOLUTION N0. PC 73-93
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE ~ITY OF ANAHEIM
THAT PETITION FOR VARIANCE N0. ~507 BE GRANTED
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim did receive a verified Petition for Veriance
from RICHARD J. AND BETTY B, FILLMAN, 112 Connie Circle, Anaheim, California 92806, Owners;
BRIAN DAJIS, 2736 West Orangethorpe, Fullerton, California 92633, Agent of certain real
property situated in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California, described
as Lot 6Q of Tract No. 70fi8 '
; and
WHEREAS, tha City Plenning Commission did hold a public. hearing at the City Hall in the City of Aneheim
or May 14, 1473, at 2:00 o'clock P.M., notice oE said public heacing heving been duly given as requiced
by lew and in accordance with the provisions of the Anaheim Muaicipal Code, Chepter 18.68,to hear and consider
evidence foc and egainst seid proposed variance end to investigete and make findings end recommendations in connec-
tion thecewith; and
WHEREAS, said Commissinn, after due inspection, investigation, end study mede by itself end in its behelf,
and efter due consideration of all evidence end reports offered at snid heering, does find end determine the following
fects: ' ~
1. Thet the petitioner requests a varience from the Anefieim Municipal Code:
SECTION 18,26.U50(3) - CoveraKe and Open Space requirements. (35% maxim~
lot coverage allowed; 44.9% coverage proposed)
2. That theee are excepkionel ar extceordinary cicrumstences or conditions applicable to the propeety in~~olved
or to the intended use o£ the property that do not apply generelly to the property or class oE use in the same vicinity
end zone.
3. That the requested varience is necessary for the pceservation and enjoyment of a substantial pmperty right
possessed by other property in the same vecinity and zone, end denied to the pcopedy in question.
4. That the cequested verience wiil not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to tl:e pmp-
erty or impcovements in such vicinity and zone in which tl~e pcoperty is located.
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT R~PORT FINDING:
That the Planning Co~ission, in connection with an Er.emption Declaration Status request,
finds and determines that the proposal woul~l have no significant environmental impact
and, therefore, recommends to the City Council that no Environmental ImpacE StatemenY is
necessary.
V1-G '1-
S ~
r
•
l J
~
~
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED thet the Aneheim City Plenning Commission does hereby grant subject
Petition for Variance, upon the following conditions which are hereby found to be a necessary prerequisite to the pro-
posed use of the subject property in order to preserve the sefety and genecel welEace of the Citizens of the Clty oE
Anaheim:
(1) That subject property shall be developed substantially in accordance wit:~ plans
and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim marked Exhibit No. 1.
THE FOREGOIIdG RESOLUTION is slgned end apptuved bv me this ~th day c~f Ma}~ 1973
ANAHEIM CITY
ATTEST:
~i~ /~~7.1~'e/
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
STATE OF CALIFQRNIA )
COUNTY OF OR~.N,E ) es.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I~ Ann Krebs, Secretery of the ~~ity Plenning Commission of the City of Aneheim, do hereby certiEy that
the focegoing resolution was passed and edopted at a meeting of the City Plenning Commission of the City of Anaheim,
h.eld on May 14, 1973, at 2:00 o'clock P.M., by the following vote of the membecs thereof:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: ALLRED, FARANO, GAU~R, HERBST, ROWLP,ND, SEYMOUR.
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: I(p,yGT00D.
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE.
IN WITNESS WHERGOF, I have heceunto set my hand this 24th day of Ma,y, 1973.
L/UJ'!~L/ ~
~ -
SECRETA~Y ANAHEYM CITY PLANNINr, COMMISSION
RESOLUTION NO. PC73-93
V2-G 'Z-