PC 74-101~ ~
''~~ ^ RESOLUTION N0. FC74-Y01
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY PLANTING COMM25S9I,ON OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
THAT PETITION FOR VARIANCE NO. BE GRANTED
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission o: the City of Anaheim did ceceive e verified Yetition for Variance
from RICHARD GEBHARDT, 2928 North Renwood, Peoria, Illinois 61604, O~.~ner; and RUIIERT
S?^~LIVAN, 105 East lincoln Avenue, Anahe~m, California~ 92805, Agent, of certain resl
property situated in the City of rlra'heim, County of Orange, State of Galiforr.ie,
described as Lot 3 of Diax ,Tunge Subdivision of a portiun of Vineymrd Lot "D7", as per
mrap thereof recorded in Booic 8, page 67 of Miscellaneous Maps, records of Orange County,
California
; and
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did hold a public hearing al the City Hell in the City of Anaheim
on May 13, 1974, et 2:00 o'clock I'.PA., notice of said public hearing heving been duly given as required
by law and in acrnrdance with the provisions of the Maheim N~unicipal Code, ChapEer 1R.68,to hear and consiner evi-
dence for and aga:nst said proposed variance end to investigate and make.findings and cecommendations in cannecrion
therewith; and
WHEREAS, said Commission, after due inspection, investigation; and study made by itself and in its behalf,
and after due considecation of all evidence and reports offered at said hearing, daes find an3 detecmine ;he following
facts:
1. That the petitioner requests a variance from the Aneheim Municipal Code to construct a'wall sign:
SECTION 18.62.155(a) - Meximum siQn area. „(8 square feet permitted; 40 square
~ feEt proposed)
2, Thst the above-ment~oned w~Lver is hereby granted on the basis that commercial
buiEdings are Pocated on either side of and within the same block as the suhjecC property.
3. That it was determined that the proposed w+-?,l sign sttould be granted for e period
of kwo (2) yeers, subject ta review end suosequert ccisideratior. for extension by the
Planning Cammiss~.on and/or City Council upon wriCten request by the petitioner.
4. That ;~:he petitfoner stipulated ta immediate removal of a disabled automobile which
is in *_he parking area aL- the rear of sucJect prop~rty.
g That thece are exceptional or extzeord~nary ciccamstances or conditions applicable to the property involved
or to the intended use of the pcoperty thet do not apply generall~ to the peoperty or class of use in fhe same vic:nity and
zone.
6. T'het the cequested varience is nece:~c~:; ~r. the preservation and enjoyment of a substential property cight
possessed by other property in the same vicinity end zone,- e:ad denied to the propecty in question.
i. That the cequested varience will not be materially dehimental to the public welfere or injurious to the prcp-
erty or improvements in such vicinity and zone in whir.h the property is located.
ENVIRON:1EiVTAL IMPACT FEPORT FINDING:
That the Director of Development Services has determined that the proposed activity falls
within the definition of Sectian 3.01, Class 1 of the City of Anaheim Guidelines to the
Requirements for an Environmental I~cpact Report and is, L•herefore, categorically exemgt fro~
the requirement to file an EIR. -
V1-G -1- Rk~SOLUTION N0, PC74-101
~:. • IttlW, THEREFORE, BE IT RE~ VED that the Atieheim City Planning Co~mmission does hereby gtant subject
Petition Eor Variance, upon the following conditionc which are hereby found to be a necessary precequisite to lhe pro-
posed use of the subject pcoperty in order to p:eserve the sefety end general welface of the Citizens of the City of
Anaheim: .
1. That subject p±-operty shall be developed substantially in accordance with plans .
and specifications on fi~.e with the City of %.naheim marked Eshibit Nos, l, 2, and 3.
2. Thet in order to determine whether any adverse effect wi11 reault from the
granting of the waiver, the Planning Commission g*~nts a two (2) year time limitation,
a£ter which time consideration may be given to:whether the waiver should be extended,
upon written request by the petitioner.
3. Thar any disabled ~utomobiles shail be removed from the subject property
immediately.
TTiE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is signed end approved by me this 9.3th day of May 1974.
_ O~ .... e ~ io/1
CHAIRMAN A?~AHEIM CITY PLANNL*TG COMMISSION
ATTEST:
'~~l.~e%C.o~~..` • ~~~Z~%~/ ~
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION .
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUPITY OF ORANGE ) Se.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, Patricit~ B, Scanlan,. Secretary of the City Plenning Commission of the City of Aaeheim, do heceby certiEy that
the foregoing cesolution was passed and adopted at a meeting of the City Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim,
held on May 13, 1974, at 2:00 o'clock P.M., by the following vote of the membe:s thereoE:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: COMPTON, HERBST, JOHNSON, KING, MORI:EY, GAUER
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: FARANO
ABSEfvT: COMINISSIONER~: NONE
IN WfTNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto'set c~y hend this Y3th day of May Y974.
t~ti(/t.G-CC~I./~ X~~i1L~C~iK/
SECE2ETARY ANAHEIM 'CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
V2-G -2- RESOLUTION N0. PC%4-101