PC 74-110~ ~
RESOL~TION NO. PC74-110
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY PLANNIiJG COMIv11SSI0N O 146 2 CITY OF ANAHEIM
THAT PETITION FOR CONDiTIONAL USE PERMIT N0. BE GRAN'fED
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim did receive a verified Petition for Conditional Use Permit
Irom DUNN PROPERTIES CORP., 2009 East Edinger, Santa Ana, California 92701, Owner, of
certain real property situated in the City of Anaheim, County ef Orange, State of California,
as described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and referre~ to herein as though set forth in
full
;and
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commisslon did hold a public hearing in the City Sall in the City of Anaheim on
Msy 29, 1974, at 2~ ~~ o'clock p.m., notice of said public hearing having been duly given as requiced by law and in
accordance with the provisions of the Anaheim Municipal Code, Chapter 18.64, to hear and consider evidence for and against said
proposed conditional use and to investigate and make findings and recommendations in connection therewith; and
WHEREAS, said Commission; after due inspection, investigstion, and study made by itself and in its belialf, and after due
consideration of all evidence and reports offered at sald hearing, does find and determine the following facts:
1. That the proposed use is proper!y one For which a Conditionai Use Pemiit is author.ized by Code Sections
18.40.060(g) and (i), to wit: establish an on-sale liquor establishment i.n each of four
(4) restaurants and a 1;200-seat triple theatre in a portion of the proposed C-1 7.one,
2. That the Planning Commission recognized that at least one of the proposed ~
regtaurants would have a semi-enclosed eating area, and these were del•ermined to be a
permitted use; provided, however, thnt said semi-enclosed eating area having not been.
advertised for consideration at this public heering shall be advertised prior to City Council
review.
3. That the petitioner expressed a desire to have on-sale beer and wine in the pro-
posed delicatessen, and the'•Pianning Commission determined that this would be an appropriate
application at the subject location.
4 That the proposed use will not adversely af!'ect the adjoining land uses and the growih and development of the arca in
which it is proposed to be located.
$. That the size and shape of the site proposed for the use is adequnte to allow the full development of the proposed use in a
manner not detrimental to the particular area nor to the peace, health, safety, and general welfarc of the Citizens of the City of
Maheim.
6. That the granting of the Conditional Use Pecmit under the conditions imposed, if any, will not be detrimental to the peace,
health, safety, and general welfare of the Citizens of the City of Anaheim.
7. Tliat one person appeared in opposition to subject petition in relationship to
the.proposed deveZopment of that portion of the subject property designated as Lot 3.
ENVI~ONMENTAL IMPACT REFOIt'T FINDING:
That Environmental Im?act Report No. 123, having teen considered this date by the City
Planning Coffinission and evidence both w:itten and oral having been presented to supplement
said draft EIR No. 123, the Planning Commission believes that said draft LIR No. 123 does
conform to the City and State Guidelines and the State of California Environmental Quality
Act and, based upon such information, does hereby recommend to the City Council that they
certify sai~ EIR No. 123 is in compliance with said Ettvirc~nmental Q~:ality Act.
CI-G .1. RESOLUTION N0. PC74-110
DEV-66•D
~ . ~ cc »
Z, ~~iIBI'T A
1- WILLIAMSON and SCHMID
Mp r ~. '~'l- CIVILZNGIN[[R! .
( ~i ~,. ~ iS35 EAST FIRST STREET
~ t ~~'~ •`~' SANTA ANA. CALIFORNIA ~J270f
f ' ~i' i PHONC 547.3986 . ~ ~ ~
• ' k?q~ •
~..~~ ~.:' . . . .
73500
4-16-74
~ ~ dn P L-~_11•~~C.-,-l~3-~'~ ~~
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT APPLICATION
"' • That portion o£ Parcel 2 in the City of Anaheim, County
• of Orange, State of California per map filed in BoGk 50, Page
2I of Parcel Maps in the office o£ the County.Recorder of said
County described as follows:
Beginning at the Northerly terminus of that certain course
in the EastE.rly line of said Parcel 2 shown on said map as
North 0° 14' 36" P7est 1150.50 feet; thence South 0° 14` 36"
East 325.Oq feet along said Easter3y line to the true point
of beginni.ng; thence Soath 0° 14' 36" East 825.50 feet along
said East~e:rl<< line to the beginning of a tangent curve therein
concave Nnr~.hwesterly.and having a radius of 25.00 feet; thence
Southwesterly•39.~7 feet along said curve through a central
angle oi 90° 00' 04"; thence tangent to said curve South 89° 45'
2g~~ Wr ~{; 869.62 f~~et along the Southerly line of saiu Par.cel 2
~to a poi.nt on a non-tangent curve concave Southeasterly and
r,aving za radius o£ 295.00 feet, a radial to said poir_t bears
South 89° 45' 26" West; thence P7ortheasterly 348.79 feet~along
said curve_through a central ar_q7.e o.f 67° 44'. 32"; thenCe tan-
gent to said curve North 67° 30' 00" East ].1U.00 feet to the
beginning of a tangent curve concave Northwesterly and having
a radius ef 310.00 feet; thence Northeasterly 261.01 ieet along
said curve th•rough a central anqle of 48° 14' 30"•; thence.tan-
gent to said curve North 19° 15' 30" East 73.G0 feet to the
beginning of~a L-angent curve concave Southeasterly and having
a radius o£ 425.00 £eet; thence Northaasterly 532.49 feei: along
said'curve;through a central angle of 71° 47' 14" to the true
poin.t of beginn'ing.
r;Containing an area of 10.644 acres more or less.
- /',M~~;~~~17~1c~192p~i
aa
. ~ ppR ,~g1 A N
. ~V Y~~l~~~~ ~ ..
' ~•~a~ ~rp1V55tiVK .V •",,.;il (~~~ ~Cf~~l~~~ ~Mi;. i4'G'~
HYDRhULICS • SURYEYIh7G • LAND PLANN~NG • H~GHWAY CONSULTANTS
_ ~.se~~
~
!~ r•
~
~ r.. . . • .'~r~ ~.
. _, ~ . . ... .Y-~ . ~ ~~ . .F.ii~t{~}`...~.
NOW, THERFFORE, B~ IT RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Pleining Commission does hereby grant subjec:
Petition for Vaciance, upon the following conditions which are neceby fuund to be a necessary prerequisite to the pro-
posed use of the subject pcoperty in order to pceaerve the safety and general welEere of the Citizens of the City of
Anaheim:
1. That this conditional uae permit is granted subject to khe completion of
Reclassification No, 73-74-55, now pending.
2. That subject property shall be developed substantiaiZy in accordance with plans
and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim marked Exhibit Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is ai~ed end eppmved by me thia 29th day of May 1974,
CHA:RMAN ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
ATTEST: ,
~ • 1
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY' PLANNIPIG COMMISSION
STATE OF CALiFORNIA )
CbUNTY OF ORANGE ) as.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, Patricia B. Scanlan, Secretery af the City Planning Commission of the City of Aneheim, do hereby certiEy thet
the foregoing resalution was pessed end adopted et a meeting of the City Planning Commission o[the City of Anaheim,
held on tZay 29, 1974~ et 2:Q0 c'clock P.M., by the foll~wing vote oE the members theceof:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: COMYTON, FA:~NO, HERBST, MORLEX, GAUER
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: *b~NE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: JOHNSON, KING
IN WITNESS WTiEREOF, I have hereunto set my hend this 29th day of May 1974. .
~ ~ ~ ~ ~r.a~t~r~
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITI PLANNING COMMISSION
V2-G -2- RESOLUTION N0. PC74-110