PC 74-111~ ~
RESOLliTION NO. PC74-111
A.°.ES^L'JT:ON OF TRE CITY PLAt1NiNG CGt~SMISSION OF THE C1T1 OF ANAHEIM
RECOh75fENDIIIG TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM THAT
PETITION FOR RECLASSIFICATION N0. ~3-74-54 gE APPROVED
IN PART WITH LESS~F I~TENSE USE
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim did receive a verified Petition for Reclassifica-
tion fcom MART'rIA K. SCIiUI~tACHER, 213 North Helena Street, Anaheim, California 92805, Owner;
anci LEONARD SbfITH, 125-D Soutti C1'audina Street, Anaheim, California 92805, Agent, of
certain real property'situated in'ttie City of'Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California,
describecl as Lots 42 and 43 of Tract No, 601, in the City of >.naheim, as shown on a map
ther.eof recorded in book 19, pages 47 and 43, Miscellaneous Maps, records of said Orange
County
; nnd
WHEREAS, the City Plaining Comenissian did hold a public.hearing at the City Hall in the City of Anaheim oa
May 29~ ,1974~ at 2:00 o'clock P.\i. notice af said public heacing having been duly given as requirr.d by
law and in accardance with !he ~~rovisions af the Anaheim Afunicipal Code, Chapter 18.72, to.hear end consider evidance .
for and against said proposed reclassif:cation.and ta investigate and meke lindings erd recommendations in connection
therewith; and
WHEREAS, said Commission, after due inspection, investigation, end study mede by itself and in its behalf, and
after due considerntion of all evidence and ceports oEfered at said hearing, does find and determine the following facts:
1. That the petitioner proposes a reclassiEication oE the ubove described propeity ftom the R-2 (MULTIPLE-
FAMILY RESIllENTIAL) ZONE to the C-1 (GENERP.l COMPIERCIAL) ZUNE.
2. That the Planning Commission determined thaC C-0 (Commercial Office) zoning was
more appropriate for the subject property.
3. That the Anaheim General Plan designates subject property,for low-density
residential uses. •
4. That it was determineci that the owner(s) of subject property shall deed to the City
of Ansheim a strip of land twelve and one-half feet (12~') in width from the centerline of
the alley for alley widening p~rposes.
5. That it was determined that the petil•ioner shall redesign the propesal so that ttie
access point on Harbor Boulevard would be along the northern propQrty line and that an ease-
menC be executeA which woul~i permit the joint use of the access point onto Harbor Boulevard
by adjoining property to the north whenever development occurs. '
b~. That the proposed ieclassification of subject pcoperty.is necessary end/or desiroble for the orderly and pro-
per development of the communiry. .
7. That the pcoposed reclassification of subject property does properly relate to the zones and theirpermltted '
uses locally established in close proximity to subject property and to tlie zones and their permitted uses generally estab-
lished throughout the community.
8. That the proposed reclassification of subject property requires the dedication
and improvement of abutting streets and alleys in accordnnce with the Circulation Element
of the GeneraY Plan., due to the anticipated increase in traffic which will be generated by
the intensificetion of land use.
9. That five (5) interested property owners.in the a*ea appeared at said public
hearing in connection with the subject petition and Area Development P1an No. 115.
ENVIRONhtENTi+L IMPACT REPORT FIhDING:
That the Flanni.n~ Commissior. recommends to :he Citg Council that t1iC suLject project be
eir_mpt [rom Lhe requirement to prepare ~n Lnvironmental Ln~pact Report pursuant tu the
provisions of thc CaliFornia Ertvironnienta: QualiCy ~1ct.
R-A -1- RGSC~LUTIUN N0. PC74-111
~ ~
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVfiL that the AnaF~eim City Planning Cocrmiission does hereby,
recommend to the City CouncP.i of the City of nrvheim that subject Petition for Reclassifica-
tion be approved and, by so doing, that Title 18-Zciring of the Anaheim Municipal Code b~
amendecl to exclude the aoove-described property fram the R-2 ~~tULTIPLE-FAMILY RL•SIDEN'LIAL)
ZONE and to incorporate said described property int:o the C-0 (COMMERCI;.L OPFICE) ZONE, upon
the followinS condition~ wtrich are hereby found to be a necessarp prerequisite to the pro-
posed use of subject property in order to preserve the safety and general welfare of the
Citizens of the City of Ansiheim: ,
1. That the owner(;~) of subject property shall deed to the CiCy of anaheim a strip
of land forty-five feet~(4S') in width from the centerline'of the street elong,Harbar.~::;':
Boulevard for street widening purposes. ' •
2. That the owner(;;) of subject properCy shall deed to the City of Anaheim a strip
of land twelve and one=hallf faet (12~') in width from the centerline of the alley for alley
widening purposes. ~
3. That the owner(s) of subject property ~hall pa,y to the City of Anaheim the sum of
~$2.00 per front foot along Harbor Boulevard for street-2ighting purposes.
4. Thst trash storage areas shall be provided in accordance with approved plans on
file with the Office of tt:e Uirec=or of Public Works.
5. That fire hydraets shall be insta"sled and charged.as.required.end determined to .
be necessary 6y the Chief of the Pire Departmer.t prior to commer.cement of structural f:aming.
6. That subject pruperty shall be served ny undergrour,d utilittes.
7. That a six-foot (6') masnnry wall shall be cons~ructed along thenorth property
line.
8. That all air-conditionir.g facilil•ies stiall be properly shielded from view and the
sound buffered from adjacent properti,es. .. ..
9.. That subject property shall be developed substantially in accordance with plans
and specifications on file witii the City of Anaheim marked Exhibit No. 1; provided, however,
that Che access point on Harbor Boulevard shall be reloc~ted to ehe north property line and
an easement shall be executed to pe=-mit joint or multiple use of the access point by other
properties t.o the norCh of scbjecL• property.
10. Prior to the introduction of an ordinance rezoning subject property, Condition
Nos. 1, 2, a~d 3, above-mentioned, shall be completed. Tha provisions or rights granted
by this .resolukion shall become nulJ acid void by action of the City Council unless said ,
coi~ditions are camplied with withLn one year from the rlat~ hereof, or such further time as
the City ~ouncil may granL•.
11. That Condition Dlos. 4, 6, 7, 8, and 9., above-mentioned, shall be complied with
prLor to final building and zoning inspections. '
TH~ r0REG0ING RESOLUTION is signed and appr ved by m~ this 29th day of May 1974.
C[~+,I N~1N ANF.nElM~ITY PLe:NNING CO~iMIS
AT •ST:
. ~
ECRETARY At~1HEIM CITY pI.~1N.NING COFAi1SSI0N
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ~ ss
CITY OF ANA:iEIM )
I, Patricia B. Scanlan, S~crEtary o£ Che City Planning CommLssion of the City of Anaheim, d~
hereby certify that the fare,going zesolution was passed and adopted at a meeting af the Cit;
Planning Commission of the ~ity Qf Anaheim, held on May 29, 1974, at 2:00 o~clock p.m., by
the following vote 6f the members thereof:
AYES: COMi~SISSIdNERS: COMPTON, FARANO, HERBST, •IdORLEY, G?.UcR
NOES: CO~tISSIONERS: KING
ABSE:IT: COMhIISSIUNERS: JOHNSON
'IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I}iave hereunto set my hand this 29th day of May 1974.'
~t~c~.1 ~ ~ x.~A~.c /
SECRETARY ANAt{HIM C TY PLANNING CO~AIISSION
R-2A -2- fiESOLCTIUN N0. PC74-111