PC 74-118~ ' RESOLUT[~O. PC74-118 ~ _
A RE50LUTION OF THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
THAT PETITION FOR ~'ARIANCE N0. 2603 RE GP.ANTED IN PART
WHEREAS, the (iity Flanning Commission of the Ciry oC Maheim did receive a verified Pedtion for Variance from
iiOWARD B'i1DLONG and JOE MAAG,20046 Santa Ana Canyon Ibad., Anaheim, California 92806,
(~wners) and SCIL"1ID CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, 1681 Langley Avenue, Irvine, California 92705,
(Ag~nt) of certain real property situated in the Ci.Cy of Anaheim, County of Orange, State
of Califurnia, as described in Exhibit "A" aCtached hereto and referred to herein as though
set forth in full
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did hold u public heuring at thc City Hall in the City of Anaheim on
June 10, 1974, at 2:00 o'clock p.m., +iotice of said public hcaring having been duly ~iven as required by law and
in accordance with the provisio:is of thc Maheim Municipai Code, Chapter 18.68, to hcar and constder evidence for and against said
proposed variancc and to investigatc and make findings and recommendations in connection therewith; and
WHEREAS, said Commission, atter due inspection, investigation, and study made by itsclf and in its bchalf, and after due
consideration of ali evidence and reports offered at said hearing, does find and determine the following facu:
1. That.,.the petitioner requests.the following pariances from the Anaheim Muncipal Code,
to construct e aixty (60) lot single-family aubdivision:
(a) SECTION 18.04.090(1)(h)(1) - Minimum side vard aeCback of a 6 foot hiRh block
wall on reversed corner lot. (5 feet required;
0 £eet proposed)
Lb) SECTION 18.08.550 - Minimum lot width on a cul-de-sac. 60 feet
required; 55 and_56 feet proposed)
(c) SECTION 18.24.030(4)(a)_ ~- Minimum lot width. (70 feet required; 55, 60,
63, 65, 68 end 69 feet proposed)
2. That Waiver 1-a, above-mentioned, is hereby granted on Che basis that Che petitimer
demonetrated that a hardship would be created if said waiver was not granted.
3. That Waivere 1-b and 1-c were withdrawn by the petitioner, eince the revised plana
indicated fifty-seven (57) lots rather than sixty (60), as originally propoaed, eliminating
the need for the waivers.
4. That there are exceptional or extraordinary circumsCances or conditions applicable
Co the property involved or to the intended use of the property that do nat apply generally
to the property or clasa of use in the same vicinity and zone.
5. That the requested variance ie necessery for the preservation and eljoyment of a
substantial property right possessed by other property in the same vicinity and zone, and
denied to the property in question.
6. That the requested variance will noC be materially detrimentel to the public welfaze
or injurious to the property or improvements in such vicinity and zone in which the prnperty
is located.
7. That seven (7) reaidents of the subject area were present, five (5) of whom
appeared at the public hearing.
ENVIRONMENTP_L IMPACT REPORT FINDI,IG:
That Environmental Impact Report No. 126, having been considered this date by the Ci.ty
Planning Commission and evidence both written and oral liaving been preaented Co supplement
said dra£t ETR No. 126, the Planning Commission believes that said draft EIR No. 126 does
conform to the City and State Guidelines and the State of California Environmental Quality
Act and, based upon such information, do es hereby recommend to the City Council that they
certify said EIR No. 126 is in compliance with said EnvironmenCal Quality Act.
V-1G -1- RESOLUTION N0. PC74-llb
_ .~ .
~ ~ E~I~~'1 ~ <<A»
• ' " ~CII1~.ilUl.l•: :1
The i~~l+dc or int~•r~~~t in tlie limd di~:~~rih~•~l ur ref~rr~•d tu iu thi. •~~I~edul~• c~~vr.red Ly tLi: repurt 2A~31-~ 3~SS>
a"i' m
~ MAY 1974 ~
a fee ~ FtECE1VED v~
a ZpN~NG ~
~~ LIViStU'I „
~~.lr \
f VC;
2~~O..~C;C1 L~ , .
'l~illr. lo ~uid c~lutc or intrrr~t al Ihc dulr h~rrrnf i> vc.tc~l iu:
12ZCE111RD ~JOSEPtI MAAG, as to an undividcd one-half iyterest an~'..deceased.
JGS^PIl bL~IG~ I~5 TRUST~I•: under tlie vri.l_ of Kose iiar audlonyr ther.eof
and the Decree of Distribution of her estate, ~ e~II~ifofdOfipcial Pecords,
br_ing recorded January 'L, 196II in book fl481. P~g IIOWARD L. IIUDLONG,
as to an undivided one-half interest, as t~ P~.rcel 1;
pgwTRUaeLE under the~illlof~}toserMary Budlong~ deceasedRDanB theLDecreo
C~1 T
-cantiaued-
Tlir i:uul n•frrr~~d lu :u Il~ix r~•p~~~•1 i< ~ilu,d~~J in Ih~~ til;~lc nf C:ilifurni:i. Cu~~ntp ~~f Orange
:tnd ix ilescrilic~l ;i; fol~n~~•~: -
_ -~~.-- ~
orti2~n nf 3.ats 1 and 2 of the Dominyuez ~gtate, in the
PARCEL 1: 'Phat p filed in book ?.r P~9e ,
County of Oran9e, State of California, a~ per map Itecorder of sai<3
15 of Itecor.d of Surveys, in the off.ice of the Coun~y
CounLy, descr?bed as fo2lows:
Beginning1069.4~1 ieethalo g~tih~eSo ~slineLof said DominguezhEstate61
thence i~orth 89° 50' 00" Eac
00" West
thence IJorth 0° 16' 30" Wc~t 1091.~a feet; ~1ence South 0°
671~15 L•eet to~tlee2~psof1Deedsfof said OrangerCountys the deed recorded
in book 20G, p 9
lg' 00" LaEt 501.50 fcet to the 3outhwesttheLSouth=line ofasaid landG
North 09° 42' 00" ~ast 39II.36 feet al,ong
tfl the L•'ast line of said Lot ointllofcbeginning. l~~ 00" Last 509.20 feet
along said Eas~ ~ine to 'the p l~ne of
EXCEPT3:N~ TIi~12EI'P.OD~ that portion lying t~esterly of the Eaater~l30 ~ru 33
Trac~ No. 7769. as sliown on a map recorded in book 3z2e Co tiY•
,~.~nclusive of DSiscellaneous Maps. records of suid Orar-9
Said lar.d is shnwn as "Psnrtion~.o7769ti z• nominguea L•'s~ate R.S. 2-15" on
Sheet 2 ot the map of Tract
PARCtiL 2s That certain real propertY situated in described~aaantiago de
~anta Ana, ~ounty of urange, Statie of California,
11 and 12, 'Pownship 4
thence
Co~menciny at tha corner co~n~non i:o SecLions l. ' ed by
:.'•outh, ltunge 9 We~t, San ]3ernardiuo llase and Meriiiia~n; und runnin9
deed recorc3ed
~~,s~ ~.3.5G5. cliainn to the Soul:hwest cornez oE the lan conve ~`enco
~. Walter Pyne to ]'ranl: ~• ~O°~'~Itecorasl of`said Orangee(: ~~Y-
tn L~ook 220, pag~ 220 of lleeds. CaNT. •
~ ~ -continued-
~ ~- ;`~~~~.~!~~/j~'' •~,, ~~~~ .._.,
r ii:, r. ~r.:: ~ ~ ~VHltIA1r'l,~ ~`~t~. _
C..TA P•~•~ nnni( H.~.~~i~ F~.w~ ~ra,
.,~~ ... . . .. . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . _.
, , ti. . - ~ ~
., .
~ Contin-:ation of Vesting
of Distribution of her estate, a certiFied copy thereof be~ing recarded
January 2, 1968 in book 8481, page 8Ol of Official Recordei, as to•an
undivided one-]ialf interest, as to Parcel 2.
Continuation of llescription ~ !5'` ~ ~
S~uth 8.935 cl-ainsf thence West ~3y565 cnains to the Sou~lneast corner
of 'Lot 2~of~~the llominquez Estate, as shown on a map fil~d in book 2, page 15
oi Licensed Surveyors' t~iaps, ltecords of said O.range County; thence P7orth
alang the ]:ast line of ~aid Lot 2, 8.93~ chains to the point oE beyinning.
Said'land and other lands are shocun on a map recorded in boolc 32, pag~
34 o~f Recor~l of Surveys, records of ~~\ ais Orange County.
1 ~ i
. ~~~ a ,
r
5 ~a~. ~ 1
,~~ ~ -~
Ma{ 1974
~~L ~~ ~~A
t.~~ ~S~~y
.,Y,., -:; ~~ 03 .
~fhiclni ~.:t I'~t1.
PdIFA (C S.~ /,r
~
:o
..~ • - ~ ~
' NOW, THEREFORG, BE IT RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Plemiing Commission does hereby grant subject
Petition for Variance, upon the following conditions which are he:eby found to be a r.ecessary prerequisite to the pro-
posed use of the subject property ir ocder to r::eserve the sefety and general weliece of the Citizens of the City of
Anaheim: ,
1. That th;is variance is granted subject to the complption of Reclassification
No. 73-74-58.
2, That subject property shall be developed subsCantially in accordance with plans
and specifications on file with the City of Ananeim m~rked Exhibit Nos. 1(Revision 1;, 2
(Revision 1), and 3 through 24.
THE FOREGOING FtESOLUTION is signed end approved by me this lOth day of June 1974.
_~i!~,~~.~e ~~si~!
CHAIRMAN ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
ATTEST:
~ ~ ~ ~~~~~~~
SB~.RETARY ANAHE*'.M CITY PLANNIt+~G COMMISSION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) sg•
CIT:' OF ANAH~IM )
I, Patriei a B. Seanlan, Seccetary of the City Plenning Commission of the City of Anaheim, do heceby certify thet
the focegoing resolution ~vas pessed ar.d adopted et a meeting of the City Planning Commission of the City oE Anaheim,
held on June 10, 1974, et 2:00 o'clock P.M., by the following vote oE the members thereof:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: COMPTON, HERBST, KING, MORLEY, GAUER
NOES: COM1iMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENi: C^MMISSIONERS: FARANO, JOliNSON
IN WITNESS WHEItEOF, I have heseunto set my hand this lOth day of June 1974.
l~ ' ~.
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
V2-G -2- RESOLUTION N0. PC74-118