PC 74-121,` ~ RESOLUTION ~ PC74-~Z1 _ ~__
A RESOLUTION OF THE i;ITY Pi..',NNTNG COMMISSION OF471E CITY OF ANAHEIM
THAT PETITION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT BE DENIED
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission of tha ~ity of Aneheim did receive a vecified Petition For Con-
ditionalUsePermitfrom HENRY F. AND ETNEL C. DEL GIORGIO, 2535 West La Palma Avenue, Anaheim,
California, 92801, Owners; and McCARTHY C0~'~PRNY, Attn: E. R. FULLEit, 2535 West La Palma
Avenue, Anaheim, Calirornia, 92801, Agent of ~P~tain real property situated in the City
of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of CaliTOi'nia, as described in Exhibit "A" attached
hereto and referred to herein as though set forth ii7 full
; end
~3`HEREAS, the City Plenning Commission did hold a public h~POZiag .et the C,ity:~ie11 ia the Ci?y of Anaheim
on June 10, 1974, at 2:00 dclock P.M., notice uf esid publ'ic F~eering having ueen duly given
as required by law and in accordence with the provisions of tha Meh~im idunicipel co~la, Chapter 1.8.54, to hear
and wnsider evidence Eor and ageinst said proposed conditional use and to investYgeYz •~r.d meke findings end
recommendetions in connection therewith; end
WHEREAS, sald Commission, after due inspectflon, investigetion, end study made by iiself anJ i;~ its be-
half, and eEter due consideration of all evi:;ence and ceports offered at said hearing, does find and vetermi~e tbe
following fects:
1. Thet the proposed use is properly one for which a Conditional Use Permit is euthorized by Co,dE Sect i.or
18.64.020(1)(:), to wit: establish a five-unit planned residential development to be used
as a model home complex with sales office for a 99-unit tra~.:t, with waivers of:
a. SECTION 18.62.060(B) - Maximum number of free-standinq siqns (~, signs
permitted; ~ signs proposed)
b, SECTION 18.62,060(B) - Maximum siqn area (10 square feet permitted; 48 square
fec~t proposed)
2. That since Che Planning Commission has recommended disapproval of the
reclassification of subject property, the proposed development could not be accomplished
within the site development standa~ds of the zoning on subject property.
3. That the proposed use will adversely affect the adJoini~g land uses and the
growth and development of the area in which it is proposed to be located.
4. That the size and shape of the site proposed for the use is not adequate to
allow the full development of the proposed use in a manner not detrimental to the partic-
ular area r.or to the peace, health, safety, and general welfare of :he Cit;zens of the City
of Anaheim.
5. That the granting of tEie Conditional Use Permit will be detrimental to the peace,
hPalth, safety, and generai welfare of the Citizens of the City of Anaheim.
6, That aporoximately seven (7) persons v~ere present and four (4) persons appeared
at said public hea~•ing, and fourteen (14) telegrams and/or mailgrams were received, all in
opposition to subject petit ion'and a petition signed by approx(mately 120 residents in the area requesting
no devietion frum the prese~t R•H 22,000 zoning, wss receEved.
ENVIRONMENTAI IMPACT REPORT FlNDlNG: ,
That at their maeting on March 18, 1974, the Planning Commission recor~mended that the City
Council ce:tify to having reviewed and co~sidered the information contained in Environmental
Impact Report No. 120 and that the final EIR has been completed in compliance with the
California Environmental Quality Act and the State Guidelines.
ci-n -1-
RESOLUiION N0. PC74-121
r -1NIL~i~~N /`,SSO~,Il~S ^ C:UNSULIlNv ~I~:~tl~5 ~c I~V~IVIV~I~~S
. , .
,: '~ . . ~
~ t~' ' ~~ . . ~ ~~ ~ : ~~ E~~~~7C' .«A„
, Januaiy 28, 1974
~ . (; ~ r- t: ~ ~. ~ F~,;.~
~,,,3~ Y 'r ~~- '~'~' ~'3 ~ :' ~'Ea,r
L•EG:1L D~SC ~i?TIO:I POi~ IIcC:1RTiIY C0.
(J?odel Site D~? Geor~io Proper~~)
?'ha: pcrtior. o'_' Saction 6, ?'or~nsnip 4 SoLth, Ran~e 8 ttiest, S2n Bernarclin~ 1T~ridian
in th2 Cocaty ~f C:ar.~~, St~te of California, accard?:~g to fhe offieeal plat o: said lur.d
in the lli;trict 1'.m1d Oifice descriUed as fol:ocvs: •
.....~.....--e«~ . •
13egi~nin~ at t;ie \'c:;h;r-est corner of said Secticn G; thence alonb the S`Test~r:~ lin~
if~ereef, South ~° 02' OU" ~ast, 8i1.73 feet; thence Er.st 20.C0 feet;. rhence Soatin
47° 39' 00° I:ast, ?.iu.^o~r feet to tite beginning of a curve concave SVestari}~ , hacing
u raclius of 60.00 feet; thence Soutneasterly GG.99 feet alono said curve tI11•OU~il 3
ce:~t=a1 ar.~le of 63° :•S' 00" to a tanoent line; then~.e South 1G° 24' CO" ;~est> 4~."0"
fce! to the o~ginr.ino of a curve concave ~asipriy, havina u t•~c;ius of 12~.i,0 feet;
tner.ce South~c:s+.~rl, 96.45 fcet alon~ s2id curve througl? a r.entral an~le oF
96° 03' 00" to a f~::g~n. line; thence South 29° 39' 0!'i" ~ast, 197.G3 ieei ~o c::~
~rua pc:int oi bes~n;.ir.~ of thc'.and herein flescribed and :he be~_r.^in~ of a ~urz•~
ecs~ca~e 17aste.ly , aayin~ a radius of .100.00 f~a;; thence Sout`~easterl;; ',S.J~ i~~:
a;c~n~ sair~ cui~%~. throa~•h o cantrzl ar.b.e of 42° 5~' 00" .o a tan~ ent line; thanc~
So~.~th i~° 26' G~" S'Jest, 101.68 feet to tlle be~inning'of a curve conen-re h•o:t:::~s4erlp
}t:tt~ih~ ~ i'3L111~ oE' i00.0~ iaet; ihence Southtivesterly 23.G4 feet aloao sairl ca:ve
thrc~g2s a central unnie of 13° 12' 00"; thence Soutli 37° 67' 00" ~tia: t, 172.u7 feat
to an aszoi~ point i~ the ~iorti~easts?•ly lirie of the Iand descriUed i~i iiie DeFd to '
Tieha~•d ~. 1'an Ficet et. u::. , reco~•ded October 2n> 1955 in i3ook 3255, P,:oe 3oG
of Oifici~,l i:ecords; thenc~ alon~ the boun~ciy thereof South 11° 30' ~GO" Isas~,
G~.G" fce:; :hcncc South 7S° 22' 00" ;9es:, 9?..11 fc~t•to the ~e~ir.^?^g of ~ cur*r~
cones~~ Soutncastcr~y having a radius ci 59.14 icet; L':en~e South::este^ly a0.~~2 fee:
a;an~~ sa;d curve tnruugh a cen.ral ~ngle o: 73° 24' to a puint tvhich is
Sout~i 0° 02' ~u" rast, 3.7G~.0~ fae~ aaid ~;.st Z~.00 faet:rom the I~or,h~~ast ~orner
of said Sc~ti~n G; ?lienc~ parailel i~iliil tIl@ S';esterty line of said secrion South ~° Q2' C~"
East 4r.00 f~et; th2i~ce l~avino tl~: t~oundary of said Van I'leet ]~nr), Sou~ti 22° 5r' 3J"
\'orth 78° 05'f UOt' Ea,~t,c~7S00tfecflofl•.encor1 ~ast, 97.J4 feet; thence ~11~~ ~ r y D .
r'orth GT° ~1' CO" ~as:, 2G7.5° fcet; :l:ence hg7gg»r~, 2 M~p ~o~~ ~
T:orth 55° 46' UO" Last, 32.00 feet; t:~enec ,. ~~~ ~ ~~~~ ^ '
2:a.^Ph ~5° 1Q' 00" ~ast 32.00 f~et~ thencc ~~ ~ ~~: •. ~ [~~:a=`r.iYf.i
, , fi 1'3~A p~ a .:~M~r'c:
Nor!t: 4° 2%~' 00" Enst, i17.5~ fcet; ti~2nce ~. =F~y`~tip `~? N~ riy,:~~crc
Iio1;h 86° 10' QO" E15t, ?..iG.00 fc;et; theitcr E ~:'-' o v ~l.~~.,,,,.,, ,~~;•.;'
Kij'
~.y;~~~<<
125~ S. CLAUDINA STf,'EET, ANl1HEIM, CALIFORNI
d 1.0~ ~,pt. o-, ~cctc.
~~ p\~~= t:.
v~s" /C ~.~'.Z~ ~2~J ~~ ~/
• r r •4 ~. f c,~ ~ I
~Jf~L-. ~5~ ~CZr~~I~~ I.~}. ..r.~`q'
A ~J2605 PMONE (714) 774-574Q (213) ~J24-1631
... `~ ' _ . .
~~ D~~cizption for licC~y Co. . ~ .
aoc T•r~o . , .
Ncrth 7G° 34' ~!4~~ ~1S~tj IlO0o00 Pcctc~thence \orth veste yaalon~ s dccurve fromt~~casterly
and having a radius
tan~ent bcaring I~'orth 13° 30' 00" ti7est, a distance of 232.?~ feet along said curvc
F through a ~entral an;le of 33° 1G' 00" to a tangent reversing curve concave North-
.~ easterly and havin~ a radius of 500~.00 fce:; thence \orthti~~esterly 238.99 feet alon5
' : said curvc ihrou~h a centr'1 anUl~ oi 17° 07' 00": thence tanoent North 2J° ;,3' 00"
- il'~st, 118.00 feet; tlience South GO° 21' 00" SVest, 38.00 ;eet to the true point of be~inning.
F . ~w~ .
Containino a gross ~cr~age of G.~07 acres more or less.
Pregared under the supervision o£ ~ ., ~ •
? ~/ f~~~i.c ./~f',/~C ~ . . ' . , .
.r~i„~=~/'~..t ~~~ _ ' , .
Gera.d D.. 19asgai ~ '~ . . .
L.S. 3756 ~ • .
' .. b~~~~ g n ~o t>>2,,~, . •
rL^~ r;r D, -r • .
~ ~g'- f • ~~ I .
,
~.~ ~ F~:er~.;:~° ~ ~ co~~~. USL• PERPt~1T P;o. ~~:~~~~-~
. ~ e'-' ~~~3~°;: oti f,` . .
JN 1699 <Cv°Si•r~L~22~~' . . .
, .. . . . ' . . .~ • • _ :._.__ .
. . , . . ~ . . ', • ' .
;.
, ~;
_.~ :
~r~e
,
. i
: ~ • ~
.~
~
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Anaheim City' li'lnnni.ng Comt¢iission does hereby deny sub~eck
Petitlon for Conditionel Uae Pernut on the busis of the eforement3oned findiegs.
THF FOREGOING RESOLUTION is signed and npproved by me this 1UYh day oF •Jun~, 1974.
ATTEST:
;. ~/
CHAIRMAN ANAHEIM CITX Ft.Ai~3NINv COMMISSION
~~~
SGCRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ae.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, P. ~caril an, , Secretary of the Ciry Plenning Commission of the City of Aneheim, do heteby cettify tha? Che fore-
going resolution wes pessed end edopted et e meeUng of the City Planning Commisaion oEtha City of Anehei~, 6eRd ~sn
June 10, 1974, et 2:00 o'clock P.M., by the following vote uf the members thereaf:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: COMPTON, HERBST, KING, GAUER
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: MORLEY
ASSENT: COMMISSIONERS: FARANO, JOHNSON
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hend thir l Ot'ii day of June, 1974.
~ '" • • ~
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COM1~iISSION
cz-n -~
RESOLUTIQN N0, PC74-121