PC 74-135~v
,~
~
~ ~
RESOLUTION N0. PC74-135 _
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
RECOMhiENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM THAT
PETITION FOR RECLASSIFICATION N0. 73-74-6Z BE~DISAPPROVED
WIiEREAS, the City Pianning Commission of the City of Anaheim did receive e verified Petition for Re-
classificationfrom THE IJILLIAM LYON COMPANY, 366 San Miquel Drive, Suite 201 Newport Beach,
Czlifornia 92660 (Owner) of certain real property situated in the City.o~ Anaheim, •~
County of Orange; State'of California, as described in Exhibit~"A!! attached hereto and .
referred to herein as though set forth in ful'~- -. .. . ..
; and
WHEREAS, the City planning Commission did hold a public hearing et the City Hall in the City of Aneheim
on Ju 1 y$, i g74, at 2:~ o'clock P.M. notice oF said public hearing having been duly given as requiced by
law and in accacdance with the provisions of the Maheim Municipal Code, Chapter 18.72, to hear and consider
evi~lence tor and against said proposed reclassification and to investigate andmeke findings andrecommendations
in connection therewith; and
WHEREP.S, said C~mmission, after due inspection, investigation, and study made by itself and in its be-
half, and aEter due consideration of all evidence and reports offered at said hearing, does find and detecmine the
following facts:
1. That the petitioner proposes a reclassification of 5ubject property as' fol lows:
Portion A: From the R-A (AGRICULTURAL) ZONE to the RS-5000 (ONE FAMILY) ZONE
Portion B: From the R-A (AGRICULTURkL) ZONE to the R-:: (MULTIPLE FAMILY
RESIDENTIAL) ZONE
2. That the Anaheim General Plan designates the subject area as appropriate for
medium-density residential development.
3. That thePlanning Commission determined that the proposed development plan for
the subject property is nof approp~iate since it does not conform to the newly-adopted
RM-4000 Zone standards, which limit the maximum permitted density to approx.imately'
10.88 dwelling units per net acre, the proposed density being 11.95 dwelling units per
net acre.
4. That the proposed reclassification of sub;ect property is not necessary and/or
desirable for the orderly and proper development of the community.
5. That the proposed reclassification of subject property does not properly relate
to the zones and their permitted uses locally established in close proximity to subject
property and to the zones and their permitted uses generally established throughuut the
community.
6. That four (4) persons submitted letters and two (2) persons appeared at said
public hearing, all,iN.oppositlon tb subject petition.. ,
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FINDING:
That Environmental Impact Report No. 107, Revision 1, supplementing Master EIR No. 107,
having been considered this date by the City Planning Commission and evidence both written
and oral having been presented to supplement said draft EIR No. 107, Revision l, the
Planning Commission believes that said draft EIR No. 107, Revision 1, does conform to the
City and State Guidelines and the State of California Environmental Quality Act and, based
upon such information, does hereby recommend to the City Council that they certify said
EIR No. 107, Revision 1, is in compliance with said Environmental Quality Act, DEV-fi6•8
RD -1- RESOLUTION N0. PC74-135
~a
~
~.
-~ ~
~
.l
II j,~GAL DL•SCRIPTIOtv~ T0~•AC'~~D1P~iNY
2nd EtEY.IS~D>.TL•ti'f`ATIVE"TRA'~'=~~~Q~~'~3'S11
;R-?. PARCcIa::a . .
• • ~ 23.526 ACRES~. ~ ~ '
i , ~ . 1:11~~J..~~~ cc~»
1
1i That portion of 2nd class land allotted to Dt. Yorba, in the
2iDecree of Partiti~n of the Rancho Canon 'de Santa Ana~ rendered .
i
3!February 3,•1874 in.Case No. 1978 of the District Court of Los
I
4'Angeles County, California, togethEr ~aith that portion of the land
~'.allotted *_o Prudencio Yorba according to a map attached to and
61,made a part of the Decree of Partition of the Rancho Canon de
7i5an~a Ana, in the County of Orange, State of California, rendered
S;in said Case No. 1975 of the,l7th Judicial District Court of
i
g!California a certified copy of iahich is recflrded in Book 28, P4~e
1~i158 of Deeds, in the Office of the County Recorder of Los Angeles
. 11~County, located in the County of Oraiigc, State of California to-
124gether tiaith that portion of Lot 53, Tr•act Na. 4593 in the City o-~ ~
13~~aheim, County of Orange as recorded in Book 315, Pages 49 and 50,
~.~ Afiscellaneou5 ~taps on file in the Office cf the. County Recorder of ~
i .
~.5 ~Orange County, de~cribed as a zvhole.as folloirs: ~
~ .....,r:.~. !
'"-^~~l6 !•r~•~`""`"Be i.nning at t}ie most easterly North corner of Tract No. 741h
~ ~ . .
• 17iin the City of Anaheim, recorded in Book 311, Pages 37 to 42 inc;.u-
°i,, ~ • . .
~ ~, 18 `sive of Afiscellaneous Dfaps in the Offi.ce of tlie County Recorder of •
? 19~Orange County; said nor~heasterly corner being also in the north-
~ ~ said IlOTt11-
20~easterly boundary of said City of Analieim; thence along
y 2~ieasterly boundary and Tract line, North 73°42'35" 11'est 10.62 £eci;
221to the beginning of a tanaent curv~, concave northeasterly and.
~~ 23I}laving a radius of 867.SS feet; thence northwesterly alon~ sai.d ,
. 4 2~' ~bouiidary lin, ;s~~id4;y~F r~~e througt-, •a ccztral anglc of 49°23'21"• ,
'4 :,~ ~~Y ~V?.
c 25 and an ar ~ticlist:,~(t~e 6_~ 74S.11 fect to the end of said curve,
K, o ~Sa\~ ~~`rt~ '~~~
• ~ 2~ thencc t: ~'rcnt:-~;.fl`~~: aid; cur~~c, along .said boundar~~, North 2~? °19' 1~"
(.~,~~r ~~N . ,
~ 27 ilSest 5~:6. f:, fee~~.`~'~to ~ie ~aost northerly corner of said Tract
k .
; e2~•~ccsoi~
t. 28 i`o. 7~llti; bci ~-~i.tio an anglc point in said boundary; thcncc
V ' •
; 29 i~o~itinuing along said boundai•y, North 51°2S'17" lVest 5~4.22 fect
I '
~~ ~0 Ito an an,r,lr. point thcrcin, bcin~ also the•southcastcrly corner
~~ 3~• jof sai~l Lot 5~; thencc lcuving saicl Ci.ty boundary, alo~ig t}ic
'i' ~ ..e ~^.i2 f~~os':
~3~ ~JVUL~l~~c_lcrl.y linc of saiQ l.ot 53, hortii 51°3G'21" "'_
,.~•.
~,: ~ MAY ~'~~ ~
I r:r c~,; ~~:s~ , ,.
~; _ ~ ~., _ , . ~. ;, ~1'?:_..'.J'.~~ r , ~ ;,. '(~r,,'%O.
~il`r , ~:1 ~ ,'.%. ~~".r
, ,f
' . _"" t' . ' '
. e
• '
. ~
,~
I
I '
i
. .
.
~ p . . ~ ~ ~ .. . ~.
~.~.thence leaving said westerly li.ne, North 38°23`39" ~ast 34.03 eet
1 ~
~ ~
~ 2:to an angle point in the southeasteriy line of said Lot 53, being
i
~ 3,~also an angle point in said City boundary; thence along the sout -
l4:easterly line of said Tract No. 4G93 and said boundary, Korth
t
~ 5'.45°09'44" East 495.79 feet to that ccurse described as having a
~ 6~bearing and length of South 53°07'47" East, 334.00 feet in Parcel
F 7'~2 of deed (State Parcel 135) recorded in Book 5705, Page 531 of
thence leaving said City boundary
; 8~Official Records ir. said Office;
i
i 9;along the lines of said Parcel 2, South 53°56'OS" East 172.98 eet
i j South 54°23'S0" East
; 7,OIto an angle point therein and continuing,
; 1.1~25G.01 fect and South 53°32'25" East 230.01 feet and South 71'°13'
t 12~22" East 1G.52 feet aand South 15°36'45" ti9est 23.39 feet and South
~.3~g~~Z1+1g+'ti~'est 172.50 feet an~ Suuth 5°09'O1" East 145.00 feet and
; 14iSouth 29°02'O1" East 2SS.OG £ect and South 34°27'31" East 314.20
4 15,~teet and South 56°14'S1" East 305.00 feet an~i So~sth 74°09'll" F:ast
~ 16~100.00 feet and South 0°09'll" East 53.18 feet to the sauthelly
F 17~line oi said Parcel 2; thence continuing, South 0°09'll" East
i 18 4.54 fect to the South ?.ine of said A1. Yorba allotment, being
` 19.also the ~orfih linc of said P. Yorba'allot~ent;'thence Soixth 20°
`' 20IZG'29" 44est 520.84 feet to the point of beginning.
r ,."21. ~ ,.. . .r ~...,, .,. _ •
22f~'10/12/7j ReVised l/2I74
I
23 J.N. ~154-004
24fJrF:ek:rks
25 •
26I
27
28 .
29
30 ~ .
31 ~ • '
V' I ,~.
G1AY 1974 =4.1 i
t. , i ;rf ~Sv`'^~'
~ ' . 2V~,; ~•.i ..
-.tr.
I ~
~~~il:l:
~~C~~,sS. ~~.~."~:~~~~:~~...~~-
• ~ ~ ~
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning Commission does hereby recommend
to the City Council oi the City of Aneheim that subject Petition for ReclassilEication be denied on the besis of the
aforementioned findings.
THE FORLGOING RESOLUTION is signed end approved by me this 8th day of July, 1974.
y ,0~....~,1,c_ l'.1 ~ .,.,ti ~
CHAIRMAN ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMI
ATTEST:
~GvT'~`~l ~ .
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION .
STATE OF l:AL1FORNIA )
COUNTY dF OF2ANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
~, p, Scan 1 an , Secretary of the City Planning Commission of the City of Aneheim, do heceby certify thet the fore-
going resolution wes passed and edopted at a meeting oE the City Planning Commission oF the City of Anaheim, held on
,luly $, 1974, et 2:00 o'clock P.M., by the following vote of the membecs thereuE:
AYES: COMMISSIONEF2S: JOHNSON, KING, MQRLEY, GAUER
NOES: Ct~MMISSI0NER5: NQNE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: FARANO, HERBST
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 8th day of July, 1974•
~~~~~~~~ ~ ~~~~~ ~
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PI.ANNING COMMISSION
ft2_D _p_ RESOLUTION N0, PC74-135