PC 74-137RESOLiJT~ N0. p~74-137
;
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSIOIS OF THE CITY OF ANAIIEI.".~
THAT PETITION FOR VARIANCE NO. 2609 BE IC~1N~D IN PART
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim did receive a verified Petition for Variance from
DOUGLAS OIL COMPANY, P.C. Box 2500, Costa Mesa, Ca.lifornia 92626 (Ou~nerj; and WILLiAM R.
[d00D; 17905 Sky Park Boulevard "P", Irvine, California 9Z707 (Agent) of c.er:tain real
property situaCed in L-he City of Anaheim, County af•Orange, State of Cal~ifornia, described
as Lot Nos. 124, 125 and 126, of Tract No. 1951 as per map recorded in book 63, pages
4 and 5 of Misce'llaneoua Maps, in the ofPice of the county recorder o£ said county; and
WHGREAS, the City Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at the City Hall in the Ci4y of Anaheim on
Suly 8, 1974, at 2:00 o'clock`p.m., notice of said publie hearing having been duly given as required by law and
in accordsnce with the'provisions of the Maheim Municipal Code, Chapter 18.68, to liear and consider evidence for and against said
proposed variance and to investigate and malce ~ndir~p~ and recommendations in connection therewith; and
WHEREAS, said Commission, after due inspection, investigation, and study made by itself and in its behalf, and after due
consideration of all evidence and repo:ts offezed at said hearing, does find and determine the followi~~g facts:
1. Thatthepetitionerrequests the follo~rl:ngrx.arfances:;£rom=.bhe Anaheim Municipal Code, to
construct a two-story ~ommercial of£ice~buYlding:
(a) SECTION 18,40.070(2-a)5-a - Minimum parkin~ area landscaaine adiacent to
residential zone. (E£fective,tree screer.
required; no trees proposed)'
~ (b) SECTION i8.40.070(3-a) - Maximum buildinQ height within 150 feet of
sin~le-familv zone. (10 feet permitted; 22 feet
•proposed.)
(c) SECTION 18.40.070 4-a 1 - Min•Lmum num6er of off-street parki.nq spaces.
• (32t6~paces required; 29 spaces proposed)
2. That Waivers 1-a and '1-c, above-mentioned, are withdrawn by thepetitioner Uased
on the revised plans as submitted.
3. That Waiver 1-b, above-mentioned, ~.s hereby grant•.1 on the basis that tha subject
property is a difficult one t~ develop due to =ts size and shape and tte.proposed development
is so designed that it~will not interfere in eny way with the residential subdivision to
Lhe west; that a screen of mature trees appruximately 25-feet high exists a1:,ng the rear
property line of the adjoin±ng residential properties to the west and said screen will
provide an effective land~caped buffer between the commercial development and the residences;
and'that the resident:ial properties along Magnalia Avenue to the north oi subject Property
are zor.ed R-1 witli a resolution of intent to C-1.
4. That there are exceptionst or exLraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable
to i_he prope*ty involved or to the;i~lr.ended use ss granted of the property that do not apply
generally to the property or class'of use iii the same vicinity and zone.
5. That the reqaested variance as gr•~ated is necessar~~ for the preservation and
enjoymenY of a substantial property right•possessed by other property in the same vici~{ity
and zone, and denied to the property i.n question,
6. That the requested variance as $ranled will not be materially detrimenr.al to the
public welfare or injurious Cc the property or improvements in such vicinity and zone in
which the property is located.
7. That no one appeared and.no corr~~spondence was received,in opposition to subject
petition. '
E:TVIR~.IFS~NTI~L IMPACT REPORT FINDING c
.' That the Planning Cummission. recor.ime;:~s ta the City Council that the subjee.e project
be ex~mpt from the,requirement to prepare an Env3ronmentai Impact Report pursuant to the
provisions of the'California Environmental Quality Act. RESOLUTION Nf~. PC74-1'37
:~
' NOW, THEREF6RE, BE YT R~LVED thet the Aneh,eim City ?lenning Commission does hereby grent sub;acS
Petition for'Varience, upon the following conditions which ace hereby found to be n necessary prerequisita to trie pr~-
posed use of the subject praperty in ordec to pceserve lhe sefety and general welface c: the Citizens of the City of
Anaheim:
1. That the owner(s) of subject property shall deed to the Ciey of Anaheim a strip
of land 53 feet in width from the centerline of the street along Magnolia Avenue for street
widening pur.poses,
2. That street lighting facilities along Magnolia Avenue shall be installed as
required by tP~e Director of Public Utilities, and in accordance with stanfiard plans and
spec3.fications on file in the0ffice of the Director of Public Utilities and that a bond in
an amount and form satisfactory to the City of A~aaheim shall be posted with the City to
guarantee the installation of the above-mentioned requirements,
3. That the owner(s) of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the sum of
$2.00 per front foot along Magnolia avenue and Ball Road for streec lighting purposes.
4. That trash storage areas shall be provided in accordance with approved plans on
file with the Office of the Directar of Public TJorks.
5. That fire hydrants shall be installed and charged as required and determined to
be n.ecessary by the Chief of the Fire Department prior to commencement of structural framing,
6. Thac sub~ect property shall be served by underground utilities,
7. That drainage of. subject property shall be disposed of in a manner satisiactory to
the City Engineer.
8. That subject properry shall be developed substantially in accordance with plans
and specifications on fi.1.Q with the City of Anaheim marked Exhibit Nos. 1 through 4
(Revision 1).
9. That Conditi~n Nos. 1, 2, and 3, above-mentioned, shall be complied wi.th prior to
the commencement of the activity authorizad under this resolution, or prior to the time that
the building permit is issued, or within a period of one year from date hereof, whichever
occurs first, or such further time as Cl-~e Planning Commission may grant.
10. That Condition Nos. 4, 6, 7, and 8, above-mentioned, shall be complied with
prior to iinal building and zoning inspections.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is si~ed end eppcoved by me this $Yh day of July 1974.
. ,
CHAIRMAN ANA.HEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISS
ATTEST:
~~i~• I_~'
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUfiTY OF ORANGE ) ss•
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, Patricia B. Scanlan, Secretary of :}ie City Plenning Commission oE the Ciiy of Anaheim, do hereby certify that
the Eoregoing resolution was pessed and adopted at a meeting of the City Plenning Commission of the City oE Anaheim,
held on July 8, 1974, at 2:00 o'clock P.M., by the following vote of the members theceof:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS:
NOES: COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS:
SOHNSON, KING, MOP.LEY, GAUER
NONE
FP.RANO, HERBST
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I heve heceunto set my hand this 8th day of July 1974.
~~1~~~~ ,~~~~
SECRETARY ANAHEIM ~ITY PLANNING COMMISSION
V2-G -2- RiSOLUTION N0, PC74-137