PC 74-142.- " ~ ~
F.ESOLUTION NO
PC74-142
A RESOLUTION UF THE CITY PLANNING COMM~S~S~6N OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
THAT PETITION FOR VARIANCE *I0. BE GRANTED
WHEREAS, the City Plenning Commission of the City of Anaheim did ceceive a veriSed Petition for Vsriance
fcom BROOKHURST APT, FUND, LTD., Attn: CHARLES CLAYT~N, 16205 East Whittier Boulevard,
Whittier, California 90607 (Owner); and HARBOR MP:NAGEMENT CO „ INC „ 601 Dover Drive,
Newport Beach, California 92660 and WESTOVER, CURftEY & MATSEN, 500 Newport Center Drive,
~te. B., Newport Beach, California 92680 (Agents) of certain real property situated
in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of Cali~ornia, as described in Exhibit "A"
attached hereto and referred to herein as though set forth in full
; and
WHEREAS, the City Plenning Commission did hold a public hearing at tae City Hall in the City of Anaheim
on July S, 1974, at 2:OD o'clock P.M., notice of said public hearing having been duly given as requiced
by law end in accordence with the provisions of the Anaheim Municipal Code, Chapter 18.68, to near and consider evi-
dence for and against said propased variance and to investigete and meke findings and rernmmendations in connection
therewith; and
WHEREAS, seid Commission, aiter due inspection, investigation, and study made by itself and in its behalf,
und after due consideration of ell evidence and reports offered at said hearing, does find end deteanine the (ollowing
facts:
1. Thet tne petitioner requests .the following variances . from the Anaheim Municipal Code, to
continue the use of four existing signs:
a. SEC. 18.62.050(c} - Maximum siRn area, (20 sq. ft, permitted; 40 and 61.4 sq.
-" ft, proposed)
b. SEC. 18.62.050(c) - Maximum number of siQns permitted. (2 signs permitted;
4 pruposed)
2. That Waivers 1-a, and 1-b, above-mentioned, are hereby granted on the basis that"•
the Planning Commission determined that the signs were not offensivc or objectionable.
3. That there are exceptional or Pxti-.ardinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the property invotved
or to the intended use of the property thet do not apply generall~ to the property or class of use in the same vicinity and
zone.
4. That the requested veriance is necessery for the presecvation and enjoyment of a substantiel property right
possessed by other property in the same vicinity and zone, end denied to the property in question.
5• That the requested veriance will not be materielly detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the pcop-
erty or impcovements in such vicinity and zone in which the pcopecty is loceted.
6. That no one appeared et said public hearing and no correspondence was receivediin
opposition to subject petition.
ENVIRONMENTAL It~II.'ACT REPORT FINDING:
That the Director of Development Services has determined Chat the preposed activity falls
within the definition of Section 3.01, Class 2 of the City of Anaheim GuideLines to the
Requiremen*_s for an Environmental Impact Report and is, therefore, catpgorically exempt from
the requirement to file an EIR.
V-1G -1- RESOLUTION N0. PC74-142
~ .-. . . . .: ; .
~ f .OfCI~%~tl~% ~ ~ • . .
. .l~1i~~~~ cc~»
,. ~,s~., . a.-~77~~7
'" ~'"~~ SCHEDULE C
-~
~ Tlie lancl ~~(erred fo in this policy is siluaied in tlie Siato of ~~~'p~ify , County
of pl-tu~,g~ CSty Of Ar.r2ieim and is dcscribed as follows:
~ Yarcei ~,: . ..___ _.. . . _ - . .
~Th~t portion oS the ;;arth r^1t oY 'the Idorthlr~:st auarter oY th:: Sou'cht~.st
o;anri::x of Sxti.cn E3, io;,:.~hip ~ Soui:h, Rsn.ge 10 He~t, in ~he .Rasicln~ 5an
Ju~n c33o:, a° S~nta P,n~, c,a shoun on a,•S:a ~l'-°-"eof reco.rd~d i,n Eock 51,
ptzge 10 of ;~3cce11.,;.ri=rn;s i~rn3, recorci:~ oS sui.d Oran~,~*e County, Cai.iSarnia,
).y.•ir;~ ~~tcrJ;l ot a lir:e Qes:xiU~3. ~ So11rn:s: . .
' Be~innin~ a~ e poin~~ in the 2;ortP.er~„v line of s~icl 2torth ha1S, d3stAnt
~•te;;tcr~;,* thcrecn 9'~0.55 icei: :ra~ i;kze i:crthsast~r]y coxn_r ~i~ereof;
~h2nce Saa~.~ G° 16' '!0" S,c:;t b55.C•2 teet to i:he i;ortherl.y iine of
Lot h oi 'A: _~~c ':~ ~Oj; . ~;,c;nl ea a 1•'.~p ~hereoS r~eord~ L~ Pr.ok 183,
k;~.~es ~ 4 to 33 oi' :•,isCC1i;11COL3 ~:e~3, recorda o~ ~tsid.County.
Y::ccep cin" i;l:erc.~kr•: i all oil, L4~, n~.er;1s ond.. uther Y~; dxrocrrbon skbstFnces
lyir:3 2;^lctr a depch oi 5U0 ieet ~rcr. tl~~ curt:u:e oY sui.d la.~ci, but ~ri~hout
~Che ri~3~i; o:' er.tiy upcn .s~,~ po~L-icn of tn°_ sur?4r~e above a d°-n~h of 50~ ;.eet,
to 'F-~.l_e, ~~rl.e~, ieis:~, e;~lcre or eril]. i'or s~ae ts rescxt~ec2 in L-hs need f1~n
T. ~, Yc~1ia nnd t•,ilriad }3, Yelli.^, Y.'~::brs?d ar.d z,ife, recordecl Septe..~ber.ll,
~.970 .'ut l:~oi: 5'~00, p4."c 43!F of Oflficiu2 F.ecords.
PF:rcc1 2:
Lo~ "A" of ?xe_^.t 2~0. 5053, cs ~Yatini on a'•:aP tY::xeoz reco~-ded 1n Boo~ 183s p~,e.3
~ 4 to j3 ~r:clvaive, of Iii~eclle.~ieous ;•lars, recozd~ oi :,nid O~.:i~e County,
Cn1i£or::i~. ' .
Excepti.ng th~~reiY~cm t.he [;estcrly 240.02 ieet thc:reof. ~ " •
~ ;~lao exaeptin„ ~:hwrefro~ i;}:a Egsterly 33•37 reet tY~ereof. (
~~_ }
;liri.'t; i~'. ~ .
./.`'. ~ ~^~ . . .
~~
, ~~' ~,~e`O ;'i
~.; ~
, ,~ J~ ~~~.
:~~.~.
~Q`~.• ;. ~:
.~Z~~; ~;:n??•1~~~.
,~'£GZ`~,,. • ,~o, • s. .
~ . =~~~
~n Fh, ~~' -_:~
f~ -~ .' ~D1
~~ C;:' "%J -
•`c} ;i;, ,•.~ :fl
.; :,r
"~'; ~:: ~ ,
~',, : ti ,•
t;'1L:?r ~ ``';t'.~ri : n°~"~
1~'~iii~iilil~L fllJ. ~S~rG! _..~..~
Cl'"~ i:~`.?C`~^~,'~;:,i f'-i`;~.._ __~' ~ '~;.~....
r ~
NO~V, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Aneheim City Planning Commission does heceSy yrant subje~4
Petition for Variance, upon the following conditions which are hereby found to be e necessary prerequisSte to U~e pro-
posed use of the subject property in order to preserve the sefety end general welfare of the Citizens of ffie C3ty aE
Annheim:
1. That subject property shall be developed substantially in .accordance with plasas
and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim marked Exhibit Nos. 1, 2,, and 3.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTiON is sip~ed and approved by me this 8th day of July 1974.
ATTEST:
CHAIRMAN ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
.,'•~;
STA1'E nF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) as. '
CITY OF ANAHEIM ' )
I, Patricia B. Scanlan, Secretary oE the City Plenning Commissian of the City of Anaheim, do hereby certify thet
the foregoing resolution was passed and edopted at a meefing of the City Plenning Commission oE the City of Anaheim,
Ueld on July 8, 1974~ ai 2:3~ o'ciur.k °.*".., by the following vote oE the members thereof:
AYES: COhiMISSIONERS: JOHNSON, KING, MORLEY, GAUER
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONG
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: FARANO, HERBST
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I heve heceunto set my hend this Sth day of July 1974.
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
V2-G -2• ~ RESOLUTION N0. PC74-142