PC 74-152RESOLU"~ff N0. PC74-152
A RESOLilTION OF THE GTY PLANNING COMMISSI~JN 1481 E CITY OF ANAHEI'M
THAT PETITION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. .-B~ GRANTED
1'lHEREAS, the City Planning Commission of.the City of Anaheim did reccivc a verified Pctition (or Conditional Use Permit
tror~i HAKOLD AUTLEP. ENTERPRISES N0. 137, INC., 14256 Cast Firestone Boulevard, La riirada,
Cal•:fornia 90638 (Owner~;:and WILLIAI~i G. TAYLOR, 811 North Euclid Street, Anaheim,
California 92801 (P.gent) ~ certain real property situated in the City of Anaheim,
County of Orange, State of California, as described in ExhlUit "A" attached hereto and
referred t~ herein as though set forth In full
;and
WHEREA.~, thc City Planning Commission did hold a pubUc hearing in thc City Hall in the City of Anaheim on
July 22 , 197~ , at 2• DOo'clock p.m., noticc of said public hcaring having been duly given as required by law and in
accordance with the orovisions of the Anuhetm Municipal Code, Chapter 18.64, to hear and consider evldence for and aga(nsl satd
proposed conditional use a~id to investigate and make ftndings and recommendations In connect[on thcrewith; and
WHEREAS, said Commission, after due inspectlon, investigation, and study madc by itself and in its behxlf, and after duc
consideration of all evidcnce und reports offcrcd at sald hearing, docs find and detcrmine thc following facts:
1. That the proposed use is properly onc for wiilch a Condltional Use Pcrmit is auiliorized by Code Se.ct ion 18 40 060 (g) ,
to wit: permit on-sale beer and wine in an existing reataurant.
2. Ttiat the petitioner stipulated that beer and wine would be sol~ ~nly in conjunc:ion
Wi.Ch tlie ssle of food.
i. That thc proposed use ~vill not advcrscly affect the adjoining land uses and lhc growt}~ and devclopmcnt of thc arca in
whidi it ;s proposed to be located.
~~. That the size and shape of the slte praposed for lhe usc is adequato to allow the full devclopment of the proposed usc in a
manncr not detrimental to the particular area nor to the peace, hcalth, satety, end general welfarc of Uie ~itizens of tlie City of
Mahefm.
5. That the grantingof thc Conditional Usc Pecmit under the conditions Imposed, if any, will not bc detrimental to thc pc~cc,
hcalth, safety, and general wclfare of lhc Citizens of the Ci.ty of Anahcim.
6. That no one was present al• said public hearir.g in opposition, and r~o correspondence
has rPCeived in opposition Co auUject petition.
ENVIRONPiENTAL_IMPACT R~POR'f FINDING.
'PhaC the Director of Deve'lopmenc Services has determined that the proposed activity falls
within the definiCion of Section 3.01, Class 1 ut the City of Anaheim Guide'iines to the
Requirements for an Environmental Impact Report and is, therefore, categorically exemp: from
the requirewent to file an EIR.
CI-G •1- RESOLUfION ti0. PC74-152
DEV-6G-D
..L-_._.. .
~,S (BJ4)
~
!~a:~: /
. 54R828, PAGE 3.
~
~
~
J
~~~.Y ?-Y+~ ~~ t t ~) )
SAI~ L~AS~~ At~tO~jG ITS T~RUS, CO;;QI7I~S~5 A?dD COVrtiA;dTS~ PROVID~S
FOR A~7 CPTiO!~ 70 PUi:CNASr.
TH~ PRL'S_`4T C1:t.'r_"k5:-{IP OF SAYU L~~1S~HOLD I~~+D OTH~R MATTERS AFF~C'tlyG
TH~ ISiTs:Ri:S7 OF TFI= Lc55CC A.'t` N0~' S!l01~i•! H~R~II'i.
DcSC~iPTI^v::: •
~
THAT PGRTIO~: OF LOT 57 aF TRACT NO. 2517~ IN:7HE CYTY OF A~iAHE ~
CcurdTY oF ~~~t~3GE, STATE ~F CALiFORr;IA, AS P~R MAP R~CORD~D IN
[iaCV. 133 P~Gt~S 4~J~ 41 A~•+D 42 "vF MISCELL~NL-JUS D1t1PS, I~1 THC
GFFICF OF TNc CCUi~TY RECGRD_it OF SAID CUUtiTY~ D~SCKIF3ED AS
FOLLO'rlS:
BcGI'td~;I'4G AT TtiE S~UTN41i:STERLY CC2;~ER JF SAID LOT~ THEI~CE NORTH 0°
15~ 05" :•l~ST ~8J..o9_FF:.T r1LOt:G TH~ tiJcST:,RLY LYNE. dF SAID LOT TO A
~,I~t~ P."vRALt'c.i. l'JI7H A~JD t~•JRTt'{=RLY 1{)0.f10_F~i:T FROI4 THA7 PORTIQN OF
THc SpUTl1~RLY LItd:: 9F SAID LUT 5N^vYl:v A~ t'~~• II9° 44° 20" ~. 152.78~+r
Orl SAID t4:~P; TH'c:`:C:: ;:ORTN ~9° 44' 20" EaST 27~.98 ~~~T -aLC~G SAID
PhRt\LLLL LIt~E TO THc £t~STt`:RLY 'L?hc OF ~AID LOT; TN~hiC£ ALO~vG TNE
El1S'T~R~Y Af+D 50UTH~RLY LItiES OF SAID L07,FS~jTALQPJG1A'CURVccCOaCAVE
g5, pp p~~;~ SOUTFICP.LY AiJD 4J:STcRLY 23,..57_
~:OR7H4lE5TuRLY i1AVI?`t6 A RADIUS .?F 15.0~7 F~~=T ANO A Ck•tdTRAL At'~tGLE OF
9D° Q0~ 50"~ SUUTti 89° ~+4~ 2~" YJ~ST I52.75 F~~7~ ti•JESTi:RI.Y 53.74 FE~T
~ ALOtvG A CURV~ COt.CAV~: h~RTH~ RLY HkVt"aG A R~DIUS OF 368.00 F~~T AVD
a, C~iVTRAL ACiGL°_ OF 8° 2?. ~ 00"~ AtiD N6RT1•1 81° 53 ~ 40't W=57 56.28 FEET
TO Tt1E PaIri7 ~JF E3cGI:7b:I~1G.
FYPARC~~L htSPS~~IN l'N~PCFFIC~2~P~7Hc~C0Ut~iTYER~COltDORhOF SAIO 25
COUtiTY ~
~'~"~~ : ~,
i~
^^ ~
~~~ J
^
° ~uv is1~€
c
,_ Z~~~;'r~n
i Z07:~';:: '`
'i OIVI;;i:~i ~'~
.•'~£~c'l1iQL68~'9`'+'
i:;1;i~i0. USt PERifiIT f~U.~~~'.~..--
4 ,
~ ' ~ ~
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Aneheim City Plenning Commission does hereby grant subjtct
?etition for Conditionel Use Permit, upon the follc+wing conditions which ere hereby found to be a necessecy prerequisite
to the proposed use of the subject property in ocder io preserve the sefety end ~enecal welface ofthe Citizens of tne
City of Aneheim:
i. That subject property shall be developed substantially i.n aacordance with plans
and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim marked Exhibit Nos. 1, 2, and 3.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is signed and approved by me this 22nd day o July I974.
~ ~
CHA RMAN ANA IM TY PLANNING COMMISSION
ATTEST:
~ • • ~~ -
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY FLANNING COMMISSION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
.L~ Patricia B. Scanlan, Secretary of the City Planning Commission of the City of Aneheim, do heceby certify that
the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting of the City Planning Comnission oEthe City of Anaheim,
held on July 22, 1974, ut 2:00 o'clock P.M., by the following vote of the members thereof:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: FARANO, GAUER, JOHNSON, KING, MORLEY, TOLAR, I~ERBST
NOES: CQMMISSIONEI2S: NGNC
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 22nd day of July 1974.
~ • • ~ -
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
C~G
_2. RESOLUTION N0. PC74-Y52