PC 74-159: •, xESOLV~ No. r~ 14- ~ 59
~E°
A RESOLUTION OF THE C1TY PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
THAT PETITION FOR VARIANCE N0. 2625 BF. GRANTED
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim did receive a verified Pedtion for Variance from THR I FTY
REA~?Y CO „ Worldway P. 0. Box 92333, 5051 Rodeo Road, Los Angeles, California 90016 (Owner);
GEORGE.E': COUL'T,~4~20.Campus Drive,.Suite 120, New~ort~Beach, CA 9z660i(Ag~nti)of:crr.bain:re:al
property situated in the City of Anaheim, Gounty of Orange, State of Califurnia, described
as being a portion of the northeast quarter of Section 23, Township 4 South, Range 10 West,
in the Rancho San Juan Cajon De Santa Ana, as shown on a map recorded in Book 51, Page 10
of miscellaneous maps, in the office of the County Recorder of said county, described as
follows: •
Bpginning at the most ~urtheasterly corner of Parcel No. 7 of a parcel map recorded in Book
29, Page 32, said point also being on the centerline of State College Boulevard; thence
southerly on the centerline of State College Boulevard, South 0° 16' 05" East, a distance
of 525.00 feet; thence South 89° 56' S9" West, a distance of 325.00 feet.; thence South 0°
16° 05" East, a distance of 275.00 feet to the centerline of Cerritos Avenue; thence westerly
on the centerline of Cerritos Avenue, South 8q° 56~ 59" West, a distance of 40.18 feet;
thence Nortli 00° 03~ 30" West, a distance of 799.99 reet; thence North 89° 56' S9" East,
a distance of 362•25 feet to the point of beginning.
~VHEREAS, the Ciry Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at the City Hall in the City of Anaheim on
August 5, 197~+, at 2:00 o'clock p.m., notice of said public hearing having been duly given as required by law and
in accordance with the provisions of the Maheim Municipal Code, Chapter 18.68, ro hear and consider evidence for and against said
proposed v~riance and to investigate and make fndings and recnmmendations in connection therewith; and
WHEREAS, said Commission, after due inspection, investigation, and study rnade by itself and in its behalf, and after due
consideration of all evidence and reports offered at said hearing, does find and determine the tollowing facts:
1. That the petitioner requests a variance from che Anaheim Municipal Code, to eonstniet two i ndustr i a 1
buildi~gs with commercial offices:
SECTION 18.52.020 - Pernitted uses. (Commerci.al offices serving the general public
not permitted)
2. That the above-mentioned waiver is hereby granted on the basis that similar
waivers have been gra~ted in the past,~and said uses have not been detrimental to the
surrounding industrial land uses; provided, however, that the uses 'shall be reviewed and
approved pursuant to Condition No. li of this resolution,
3, That the petitioner stipulated that the industrial office tenants would typically
consist of advertising agencies, architects, engineers, graphic arts agencies and con-
tractors, and that supportive uses would consist of display, sales and se n~icing of business
machines and equipment; drafting, blueprinting and photocopying services; duplicating;
mimeographing; addressing, secretarial and teiephone services; and etectronic data processing
tabulating and record keeping services.
4. That the petitioner further stipulated that retail sales in cortjunction with
permitted general industrial functions would conform to the requirements of the M-1 (Light
Industrial) Zc,ne.
5. That the petitioner stipulated to compliance with City standards and requirements
for construction and location of trash enclosure areas.
6, That there are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or condit3ons:~p(~li:cabi~
to the property involved or to the intended use of the property that do not apply generally
to the property or class of use tn the same vicinity and zone.
7. That the requested variance is necessary for the preservatlon and enJoyment of a
s~bstantial property right possessed by other property in the same vicinity and znne, and
denied to the propsrty in question.
8. That the requested variance will not be materially detrimental to the public
welfare or injurious to th~ property or improvements in such vicinity and zone in which the
property is located.
V~~ _,~ _ RESOLUTION N0. PC74-159
DEV-66-E
~ ~
9. That no one indicated their presence at said public hearing in oFposition and
no correspondence was received in opposition to subject petition.
ENViRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FINDING:
TFat the Planning Commission recommends to the City Council tha.*. the subject project be
exempt from the requirement to prepare an Environmental Impact Report pursuant to the
Nrovisions of the California Environmental Quality Act.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning Commission does hereby
grant subject Petition for Variance, upon the following conditions which are hereby fourid
to be a necessary prerequisite to the proposed use of the subject property in order to pre-
serve the safety and general welfare of the C?tizens of the City of Anaheim:
l. That all engineering requirements of the City of Anaheim along State College
Buulevard and Cerrttos Avenue including preparation of improvement plans and installation
of all im~rovements s~ch as curbs and gutters, sidewalks, street grading and paving, drainage
facilities, or otner appurtenant work shall be complied with as required by the City Engtneer
and in accordance with standard plans and specifications on file in the office of the City
Engineer; and that a bond in an amount and form satisfactory to the City of Anaheim shall
be posted with the City to guarantee the installation of the above-mentioned requirements.
2. That the owner(s) of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the sum
or $2.00 per front foot along State College Boulevard and Ce:rBtos Avenue for street
lighting purposes.
3. That trash storage areas shall be provided in accordance with approved plans on
ftle with the office of the Director of Public Works, as stipulated to by the petitioner,
4. That fire hydrants shall be installed and charged as required and determined to
be necessary by the Chief of the Fire Department prior to commencement of structuraf framing.
5. That subject property shall be served by underground utilities.
6, That drainage of subJect property shall be disposed of in a manner satisfactory
to the City Engi~eer.
7. "That appropriate water assessment fees as determined by the Director of Public
Utilities shall be paid to the City of Anaheim prior to the issuance of a building permit.
8. That subject pfoperty shall be developed substantially in accordance with plans
ard specificatiors on file with the City of Anaheim marked Exhibit Nos. 1 and 2.
9. That Condition Nos. 1 and 2, above-mentioned, shall be complied with prior to
the commencement of the activity authorized under this resolution, or prior to the time
that the building permit is iss~ed, or within a period of one year from date hereo`, which-
ever occurs first, or s~ch further tlme as the Planning Commission or Gity Council may grant.
I0. That Londition Nos. 3, 5, 6, and 8, above-mentioned, shall be complied with
prior to_final building and zoning inspections. '
11. That each use proposed to be established on subJect property shall be submitted
in written form to the Development Servtces Department for review and approval 'r~ order
that a determination may be made as to whether the proposed use wouid be appropriate for
the site and whether sufficient parking is provided on the property to accom+.nodate an
additio~al parking demand created by such a use. In order t~ provide guidelines for staff
determination, the following type of uses, as submitted and stipulated to by the petitioner,
may be permitted subject to the written request and review procedure outlined above:
a. Advertising agencies
b. Architects
c. Engineers
d. Graphic arts agencies
e. Contractors ~
f. Display, sales and servicing of business machines and equipment
g, Drafting, blueprinti~g and photocopying services
h. Duplicating and mimeographing
i. Addressing, secretarial and telephone services
J. Electronic data processing tabulating and record keeping services
If a question arises as to the decision made by the Deve~lo~ment Services Department con-
cerning a particular request, the matter shall be submitted to the Planning Commission at
its next regular meeting for determination. The applicant may appeal any Development
Services Department or Planning Commission decision to the City Council,
12. That any retail sales in conjunction with permitted gene~ai i~dust~tal functions
shall conform to the requirements of the M-1 (Ligh± Industiral) Zone, as stipulated to by
the petitioner.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is signed and approved by me this St ~day of August, 1974.
~ ~
CHA N ANA CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
_2_ RESOLUTION N0. PC74-159
. '. ~
J.
~
ATTEST:
l ~~.tLt~,c-ttJ ~ ~/,i~r~~-rcJ
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, Patricia B. Scanlan, Secretary of the City Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim,
do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting of the
City Planning Commission af the City of 4naheim, held on August 5. 1974, at 2:00 o'clock
P.M „ by the following vote of the members thereof:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: JOHNSON, KING, MORLEY, HERBST
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: FARANO, GAUER, TOLAR
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 5th day of August, 1974.
l~'.~~h-c-c.~c-Dl~/°'• ~l,l~ii~t~-C'~t/
SECRETARY ANAHEIPI CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
_3_ RESOLUTION N0. PC74-159