PC 74-16r- "• ~ ~
RGSOLUTTON NO. PC74-16
A RESOLUTION Or THE CITX PLAN*IL'~TG COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ADIAHEIN
THAT PETITION FOR VARIANCE NO. 2575 BF CRANTED
WHEREAS, the City Planning (Commission of the City of Aneheim did receive a verified Petition for Veriance
from JAMES F, OUSTERHOUT ANDiPHILIPE E, DELGADO, Post Office Box 1182, Orange, California
92668, Owners; DON J. CARSO~I AND EL DEAN WILSON, 4332 East La Palma Avenue, Anaheim,
California 92806, Agent df certain real propeuty situated in the City of Anaheim, County
of Orange, State of Califo~+nia, described as 'fhat portion of the Southwest quarter of the
Southwest quarter of Section 24, Township 4 South, Range 10 [dest in the Rancho San Juan
Cajon de Santa Ana, as shown on a mep thereof recorded in book 51, page 10, Miscellaneeus
Maps, reconds of said Orange County, described as followe: Beginning at the Northeast
corner of the land described in the deed to Lonnie M. Dunn and Mary R. Dunn, husband and
wife, reco~rled January 16, 1964 in book 6885, page 959, Official Records, said point being
on the SouCh line of the North 32.00 feet of said Southwest quarter of the Southwest quar-
ter, Easterly 223.00 feet from the West line of said Southweat quarter of the Southwest
quarter; thence Easterly 115.30 feet along said South line to the Easterly line of the
land described in the deed to Traveler~s Inn-Lanadell, a joi:.t venture, recorded Septem'~~er
27, 1963 in bouk 6736, page 422, Official Records; thence South. 14° 20' OQ" East, 575.00
feet along said Easterly line to the North line of the Atchison, Topelca and Santa Fe Rail-
road right of way; thence Westerly along said North J.ine to the East line,or Southerly pro-
longation of the land described in said deed to Lonnie M. Dunn and wife; thence North 14°
24~~00" West to an angle point on the last mentioned Easterly lin.~; thence NoSth 0° 07P 45"
East, 120.00 feet ta the point of beginning
.,~ ,
; end
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at the City Hall in the City of Anaheim
on January 21, 1974, at 2:00 o'clock P.M., notice of said public hearing heving been duly given as cequired
by law and in accordence'with the provisions of the Anaheim Municipel Code, Chap4er 18.68,to hear and considec evi-
e~ence fer end ageinst said proposed variance and to investigate and make findings end recommendetions in connection
thecewith; and
WHEREAS, said Commissioq, after due inspection, investigation, end study made by itself and in its behelf,
end after due consideration of all evidence and reports offered at said hearEng, does find and detecmine the following
facts:
1, Thet the petitioner requests the fOllowing variance from •the `hnaheim Municipal Code, to
permit continued use of an existing business:
a. S~CTION 18.52.020 - Per.nitted usea. (4fanu£acturing and accesaory retail
uses permitted; retail ase not in conjunction with manu-
facturing uses prop~sed)
2. That Waiver 1-a, above-mentioned, is hereby granted on Che basis that the petitioner
stipulated that lese than 2% of sales at the subject location would be retaii in naturs,
3. . That there ace exceptional or extreordinary circumstances or conditions appliceble to the property involved
or to the intended use of the preperty tha: do not apply generelly ta the pcoperty or class of use in the same vlcinity and
zone.
4. That the :equested variance is necessary Eor the preservetion and ;;njoyment of a snbstantial propexty iight
possessed by other property in the same vicinity and zone, and denied to the prape:ty in question.
5. Thet the cequested veriance will not be ma:erially detrimentel to the public welface or injurious to the prop-
erty or improvements in such vicinity and zone in which the property is located.
ENVIRON[~NTAL IMPnCT REPORT FINDING:
That the Planning Commission, in connection with an Exemption Declaration Status request,
fin~~. and determines:tihet the proposal would have no significx,r.t environmental £tnpact and,
the:~i~ore, reaommends to the City Council that no Environmental Impact Statement ia neceseary.
~• ~ • -1-
RESULUTION N0. PC74 ~16
~
`\
~/. \ '^, s~
r ~.
,~... ~ ~
, 1'HE't;rFVRc., 5:: I's RF.SC?LV;i.i :h3t ;i~e Ai:nheim C~~y 'rir.uni:~g Cowmiss_on docs heeeLy g:ant subj~:t
?'a2ition~FUt 'Jariance, upon the iollawing conditiong which e+re herehy fouad to be a necesss:~ Fr:r~~uEsii. cc the pro-
~ed use oi the subject property in arder to Qreserve the sc!fety and gene:nl welfare of the Ci:ize:~:: oi ciic: City of
+. ~ _heiat: .
(11 That the cwner.(s) of su'~,jec: property sha~l deed ta the City ef A.^,uf:G-:.~ ?^sCC~t•
.',.°.!~,.i !~5 fce.*. ir. {7:.:~CI1 FCn~ h~=t• C•:.".::!:1'~.;.SiC 7f LF~2 ECiRf!~ e'~Gf~ 17rrnlp~.1 ~Vl~TlliL FQI: JCS••Gt
w:.deriing pnrposea.
(2) That eidewalks shell be installed along Howell Avenue as required by the Gity
Engineer and in accordance with standard plans and specifications on file in the office of
the City Engineer, .
(3) That all engineering requirements of the City of Anaheim, along Howell Avenue
including preparation of improvement plans and installation of ell improvements such as
curhe and gutters, sidewalks, street gradins and paving~ drainage facilities, or oCher ap-
purtennnt work shall be complied with as required by the City Engineer ar.d in accardance
with standard plans and specificatiuns nn file in the office of the City Engineer; and that
a bond in an amount ~nd form satisfactory to the City of Anaheim shall be posted with the
City to guarantee the installation of the above-mentioned requirements.
(4) That sub3ect property shall be developed substantially in accordance with plans
and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim marked Exhibit Nos. 1, 2 and 3.
(5) That Condition Nos. 1 and 3, above-mentioned, shall be complied with prior to the
commercement of the activity authorized under this resolution, or prior to the time that the
building permit is issued, or within a period of one year from date hereoi, whichever occurs
first, nr such further time as the Planning Commission may grant,
(6) That Condition Nos. 2 and 4, above-mentioned, shall be complied with pr:lor to
final building and zoning inspections.
~~ THE F'OREGOI.*IG RESOLUTION is si~ed end eppcoved by me this 21st day of January, 19'14.
^ ///~~'~ ~iY ~~ ~~-~1~La; ~ w
' CHAiRMAN ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSI~
ATTEST: •
` ~ ' ~ ,
:~ SECRETA ANAHEIM C1TY PLANNING COMMISSION
STATE OF CALIFORNTA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) gg•
CITY•OF AIVAHEIM )
I~;Patricia & Scanlan,Secretary of the City Planning Commission of the City oE Anaheim, do hereby certify thet
the foregoing resolution wes passed and adopted at a meeting of the City Planning Commission of the City of Aneheim,
held on January 21, 1974~ at 2:00 o'clock P.M., by the following vote of the membecs thereoE:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: HERBST, KING, SEYMOUR, GAUER.
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE.
'~ABSGNT: COMMISSIONERS: PARANO.
IN WITNFSS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hend thls 21st day of January, 1974.
.~~~~• ,~~,.,
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
-2-
RESOLUTTON N0, PC74-16