PC 74-160~' ./ RESOLUTI~NO,
PC7~+~160 ~
A R'i:SaLUTION OF 3';?E C1TY PLANNING COMMTSSION OF TNE CITY OF ANAHEIM
RECOMMENDING TO "['HE CIITY GSUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM THAT
PETfTION FOR RECL ,~SSFICA'~ION NO. 74'~~-2 BE APPRUVED
WHEREAS, thE City P:anning Commissien of thr. Gity of Anaheim did receive a verified Petition for Reclessifica-
tionfrom WARR~N AXELROD, et aa~ 350 North Canon Drive, Beverly Hilis, Caiifornia 90210,
(Owner); WILLIAM L.,. SNELLING, 350 Ncrth Canon Drive, Beverly Hills, California 9021Q,
(Agent,) of certain real property srtuated in the CiYy of Anaheim, County of Orange,
State uf Californi~, described as The k'est 132 feet of Lot 21 of TracL No. 498, Berger
Half-Acres, as ~haw7 0~+ a Mep recorded in Qook 19, page 24 of Miscellaneous Ma,ps, records
of Orange County, Cal'afornia, together with any right, title or interest grantors may have
ln and to any well or pumping plant sit~ated on lo':s 3 and 22 of the above mentioned Tract
No. 498.
Parr.ei R;
Lo~: ?:wenty-twm (?,2}. Tract No, 4.~1~1. "Berger Half-Aeres", as per map
t!:::reof recorded in Besflk 19,, a* t'age 24, of Miscellaneous Ma~s,
records of Qrange ~~u~ty, tc~ether witi; the wel; and pumping plant
the rear:.
P~ rc:;:l 2:
Lot t:;r~~ ~3j, Tract No. ~+~D, "Berg~f Nalf-Acres", as per map thereo`
recorded in Bonk 19, :"~!l ~.oy< <'~y of Miscellaneous Maps, records of Orange
County, together with t:he :.e'74 a~:d pumping plant thereon.
; and
wH~REAS, tl+e Cit; ~~fanning Commission did hold a public hearing et the City Hell in the City of Aneheim on
August ~, 19~4, ^' ?'('0 r,'clock P.M. notice aE seid puhlic heering having been duly given as required by
low and in accordence with fhe p;o',lsion.s of the Aneheim Municipal Code, Chepter 18.72, to hear end conslder evidence
for end egainst said proposed tedidssificetion end to investigate end meke Elndings end recommendations in connectlon
thecewith; and
WHEREP.S, neid CommissIon, after due inspectlon, investigation, end study mede by itsel2 end in its behelf, and
efter due consideration of t+11 Pvidence and ceports offered at seid hearing, does Eind end determine the following fecte:
1. Thet the petitioner proposes a teclessificutlon of the ebove described property from the R-A (AGRICULTURAL~
ZONE to the C-1 (GENERAL COMMERCIAL) ZONE.
2. That the Anaheim General Plan designates subJect property for commercial/recreation
uses.
3. Thet the ~roposed reclassificetion of subjact property is necessery and/or desirsble Eo: the orderly end pro-
per development ef" ihe communtly,,
4. Thet the proposed ret~iasuiEicetion of subject property does propedy relate to the zones and thelr permitted
usea locelly esteblished in c?nee~ proximlty to subJect peoperty end to the zones end their permitted uses generelly esteb-
llehed throughout the community.
5, That the proposed reclassification of subject property requires the dedication and
improvement of abutting street5/alleys~~ln~accordance with.the'Circulation Element bf the'
General Plan, due to the anticipated increase in traf`ic which will be generated by the
intensification of land use.
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FINDING:
That the Dir~ctor of Development Services has determined that tRe proposed activity falls
wEth(n the definition of Section 3.~~. Class 11 of the City of A~ahelm Guidelines to the
Requirements for an Environmental Impact Report and is, therefore, categorically exempt
from the requirement to file an EIR.
n A _1_ RESOLUT ION N0, PC74-160 DEV-G6•A
, NOW, THEREFORE, B~ I~E50LUED that the Anaheim City ~nning Commission does hereby
recommend to the Citv Counc of t.he City of Anaheim that su ect Petition for Reclassif-
icatian be approved and, hy•,so doSng, that Title 18-Zoning of the Anaheim Municipal Code
be amended to e:cclude the aba~+t ~~x.SCr'sbed property from tha R-A (AGRICULTURAL) ZONE and to
incorporate said c~s::ribed proper^cy i~tR the C-1 (GENERAL COMMERCIAL) ZONE upon the
following condibio~ta whic.h are hPreby f`~vn~ to be a necessary prerequisite to the proposed
use of subject property in arder ko pr~e7~:.:Ye the safety and general welfare of the
Citizens of the City of Anat~eim:
(1) That a!1 e~~§Ineerirvg requireme~~s ~f tiy~e Cct,y of F~naheim.along.Mountain View
Avenue including preparattu;~ ~i~ i~ravement Qla.~s and imstallatien of a"I1 improvements
such as curbs and gutters, sidewalks, stres~Y y;,~dcn,r ~nd ~aa~ing, drainage facilities, or
other appurtenant work shall be complied~Witlh ~s> req~iire~~ by the City Engineer and in
accordance with standsrd plans and sflecisicetions en fYle in the office of the City
Engineer; that street 13ghting ~aci!itit,5 along Mour~tain Uiew Avenue shall be installed as
required by the Director of Pu~li~ ;;tii~~~es, and bn ac~ordance with standard plans and
specifications on file in tfie office of the Director o~F `?ublic Utilities; and that a bond
in an amount and form satisfactory to the City of Anaheim shall be posted with the City
to 9uarantee the installatiun of ~h~ above-nwnt~oned requirements.
(2) That the owner(s) of su`+jef`.';~ro~ert;~ shall pay to the City of Anaheim the
sum or 60C per front foot along Moun',:ain ~1iew E~v~~.~ue for tree planting purposes.
(3) That trash storage areas shall be p•soiEded in accordance with appr~ved plans
on file with the office of the Director af Pu~elt~ W~~rks.
(4) That fire hydrants shail be installed and charged as required and determined
to be necessary by the Chief of the f'ire Department prior to commencement of structural
framing.
(5) That all air-conditioning faciiities shall be properly shielded from view, and
the sound buffered from adjacent properties.
(6) That subJect proFerty shall be served by underground utilities.
(7) That dreinage of subject property shall be disposed of in a manner satisfactory
to the City Engineer.
(8) In the event that subject property is to be divided for the purpose df sale,
lease, or financing, a parcel map, to record the approved division of subJect property
shall be submitted to and approved bv the City of Anaheim and then be recorded in the office
of the Orange County Recorder.
(9) 7hat a 6-f~ot masonry wall shall oe constructed along Ithe east and south
property 11nE~~.
(10) That ap~roprfate a~ater assessment fees as deY.ermined by the Director of Public
Utillties stiall be paid to the City of Anaheim prior ta the issuance of a building permit.
(11) That any parking area lightin9 proposed shall be downlighting of a maximum
height of 6 feet, which lighting shal! be dTrected away from the property lines to protect
the residenttal integrity of the area..
(12) Prior to the introduction of an ord(nante rezonir,g subject property, Condition
Nos. 1, 2, and 8, above-mentioned, shalt be corrpleted. The pravtsions or rights granted
by this resolution shall become nufl and void by action of th~e Cfty Council unless said
conditions are complied witli within one year from the date hereo'F, or such further time
as the City Council may grant.
(13) That Condi~'o,~ Nos. 3, 5, 6, 7~ 9~ ~nd 11, above-mentioned, sha-1 be complied
with prior to final bui~~ing and zoning inspections.
THE :'OREGOIK6 RESOI.U'ION is ~•igned and approved by me th t day of August, 1974.
/~.
• ~
L_~/ ~'
CHA RMAN Attatf£'fM i:ITY PLANNING COMMISSION
ATT T:
~~.~ ~ /
;~/~. L.C~CiC.t_ ,~ l.~ !~7V
SECRETARY ANAHE fl1'GITY PLANNING COM111SSlON
_p- RESOLUTION N0. PC74-160
~
.
r .~
L
~
~
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, Patricia B. Scanlan, Secretary of the City Plannin9 Commission of the City of Anaheim,
do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting of the
City Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim, held on August 5, 1974, at 2:00 o'clock
P.M., by the following vote of the members thereof:
AYES: CGMMISSIONERS: FARANO, GAUER, JOHNSON, Kii~G, MORLEY, TOLAR, HERBST
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
iN WITNE55 WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 5th day of August, 197~•
~r~~~~' ,~~~~
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING CQMMISSION
-3- RESULUTION N0. PC74-160