PC 74-161RESOLUTIO~. PC74-161 ~ _
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY PLANNING COMMiSSION OF E CITY OF ANAHEIM
THAT PETITION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 14~ BE GRANTED I N PART
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission of the City oE AnaF~eim did receive a verified Petitiou for Con-
ditional Use Permit from WARREN AXELROD, et al , 350 N~~r:ii Canon Drive~ Beverly ii i l ls, Cal ifornia
90210 (Owner); WILLIAM L. SNELLING, 350 North Canon Drive, Beverly Hills, California
90210 (Agent) of certain real properYy situated in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange,
State of California, described as The West 132 feet of Lot 21 of Tract No. 498, Beryer
Half-Acres, as shown on a Map recorded in Book 19, page 24 of Miscellaneous Maps, records
of Orange County, California, together with any right, title or interest grantors may have
in and to any well or pumping plant situated on lots 3 and 22 of the above mentioned Tract
No. 498. .
Parcel 1:
Lot twenty-two (22), Tract No. 498, "Berger Half-Acres", as per map thereof
recorded in Book 19, at Page 24, of Miscellaneous Maps, records of Orange County,
together with the well and pumping plant thereon.
Pa rce 1 2:
Lot three (3), Tract No. 498, "Berger Half-Acres", as per map thereof
recorded in Book 19, at Page 24, of Miscellaneous 11aps, records of Orange County,
together with the well and pumping plant thereon:i;:
; and
WHEREAS, the CityPlanning Commission did hold a public hearing nt the CityHall in the City of Aneheim
o~ August $, 1974, et Z:00 o'clock P.M., notice oE said public hearing having been duly given
as required by law and ia eccordance with the provisions oEtha Aneheim Municipal code, Chepter 18.64, to hear
and consider evidence for and egainst seid proposed conditional use and to investigate and meke findings and
recommendations in connection therewith; end
WHEREAS, seid Commission, after due inspection, investigetion, and study made by itselE and in its be-
half, ond aEter due considewtion of all evidence end reports offered et seid hearing, does find and determine the
following iacts:
1. That the proposed use is properly one for which a Conditional Use Permit is authorized by Cocle Sect i ons
18.40,060(j) and 18.64.020(3)(d), to wit: to establish an automobile leasing, rental and
wholesale agency with waivers of:
a. SECTION 18,40.070(2)(a)5a - Required tree plantinq. (Tree screen adjacent to a
residential zone boundary required; none proposed)
b. SECTION 18.40.070(2)(a)6 - Minimum parkinq area landscapinq. (2% of parki~g
area to be landscaped; none proposed)
c, SECTION 18.40.070(2)(a)6 - Maximum fence height. ( feet permitied; 6 feet
proposed)
2. That Waiver 1-a, above-mentioned, is hereoy granted on the basis that there is
an intent to rezone the adjacent residential property to C-1 (General Commercial) in which
event the requested waiver would no longer be required,
3. That Waiver 1-b, above-mentioned, was wtthdrawn by the petitioner; and the
petitioner stipulated to providing the required landscaping within the parking area.
4. That Waiver 1-c, above-mentioned, is hereby granted on the basis that the
petitioner demonstrated that the proposed six-foot high fence was necessary for security
reasons, and that trees would be provided w?thin the 3-foot landscaped setback adjacent to
Mountain View Avenue,
5, That the peti:ioner stipulated that no entrance or er.it would be provided from
the subject property to Mountain View Avenue.
6. That the petitioner stipulated to the conditions of approval for Variance No.
2345, as set forth in Condition Nos. 3, 4, 5, 6 and 7 below.
7. That the proposed wholesaling of automobiles is considered an appropriate
accessory use to the primary use of the automobile leasing and rental operation; however,
it would not be considered appropriate as a primary use and, therefore, upon termination of
the primary use, Conditional Use Permit No. 1483 shall become null and void.
CI-G ~~' RESOLUTION N0. PC74-161
~ ~
8. That the proposed use as granted will nat adversely affect the ad~oining land
uses and the growth and development of the area in which it is proposed to be located.
9. That the size and shape of the site proposed for the use is adequate to allow
the full development of the proposed use as granted in a manner not detrimental to the
particular area nor to the peace, health, safety, and general welfare of the Citizens of
the City of Anaheim.
10, That the Conditional Use Permit as granted and under the conditions imposed, will
not be detrimental to the peace, health, safety, and general welfare of the Citizens of
the City of Anaheim.
I1. That one person was present at said publlc hearing in opposition to subject
petition, being a representative of the Anaheim Beautiful Committee; and that no
correspondenca was received in opposltion to subject petition.
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FINDING:
That the Director of Development Services has determined that the proposed activity falls
within the definition of Section 3.01, Class 11 of the Clty of Anaheim Guidellnes to the
requirements for an Environmental Impact Report and is, therefore, categorlcaily e:cempt
from the requirement to file an EIR.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning Commtssion does hareby
grant in part subject Petition for Conditional Use Permit, upon the following conditions
which are hereby found to be a necessary prerequisite to the proposed use of the subject
property in qrder to preserve the safety and general welfare of the Citizens of the City
of Anahetm:
l. That this conditional use permit is granted subject to the completion of
Reciassification No. 7~+-75-2.
2. That subject property shall be developed substantially in accordance with pians
and specifications on f31e with the City of Anaheim marked Exhibit No. 1; provided, however,
that two percent (2%) of the parking area shall be la~dscaped, as stipulated to by the
petitioner.
3. That ne used vehicles shall be taken in trade, as stipulated by the petitioner.
4. That the sales of the vehicles shall be conducted only on the parcel located
south of the existing automobile leasing agency.
5. That sales of vehicles shall be restricted to those vehicles originally assigned
to the Southwest Leasing Corporation facility located at 330 East Katella Way.
6. That no prices shall be placed on the windshields of the vehicles being offered
for sale.
7. That this conditional use permit shall become null ard void at such time as tl~e
leasing and rental facility terminates operations on subJect property and the northerly
parcel.
8. That no entrance or exit shall be provided along the property line abutting
Mountain View Avenue, as stipulated by the petitloner,
THE FOkEG01NG RESOLUTION is signed and approved by me thi th ~y~ August, 197~+.
. ~ ~~
~ C I MAN ANA CITY PIJ~NNING CdMMISSION
ATTEST:
/ ~~ct-t~ ~ ~ ~~ca/
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, Patricia B. Scanlan, Secretary of the City Planning Commt>sioa of the City of Anaheim,
do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting of the
~ity !'tenning Commission ~f the City of Anaheim, held on August 5, 1974, at 2;00 o'clock
P.M., ~y the followin~ vote of the members thereof:
AYES: COMMfSSI0NER5: GAUER, JOH~SON, KING, MORLEY, TOUaR, HER9ST
NOES: GOMMISSIONERS: fARANO
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set hand this 5th day of August, 1974.
" ~.f ~. . L~ GC~~Q~.'/
ECRETARY ANAHEIM Cl7Y PLANNING C011P115510N
_2_ RESOLUTION N0, PC74-161