PC 74-163~ ,• RESOL~TI~o. PC74-163
A RESOLUT[ON OE THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY Of AAA1dCi~1
THAT PETITION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERHIIT N0. _~ 48`~-BE GRANTLL~
WH&REAS, the City Planning Commission of tha City of Anaheim J;d reccivc a vcrificd Petition for Conditional Use Rermit
from J., RiCHARD FARLEY ~ ROBERT P. DUPRE, 3~+~ Saysida Drive "4", NPwpart Beach, Caiifornia
92660 (OwnFrs~; QUAIL, IN~., 1140 South CypresS dt7'ee4y La Habrr~, Califorr.ie 4c1637 (Agent)
of certain real propertx :t,u.~t;a~' in ,he Cit~• of ~.~n~iPim, C~4niv of Oran~e, :i :<•:~ of
Cai iTOrnia, !~CSG7ic,'rwci ~ss :.uts 1i ar» ;~' :r, '<'r~';>= F~a, ~?~7.3~ ds shown on r map r:` ,':°~6d in
Book 169, pages ~z .~rYC' `LG af M~~c.Qi{nncpL~ i~~~~~, r~,sq~:i,. ~s ~range GouR=;~, Csb;:wr•ri'la
;and
WFIBREAS, the City Planning Commissien did hold a public hearing in the City Hall in the City of Anahcim on
Augus t 5, 1 g74, at 2; 00 o'clock p.m., notice of said public hearing having been duly ~iven as required by law and in
accordance with the provisions of the Anaheim Municipal Code, Chapter 18.64,to hear and consider evidence for and against said
proposed conditional use and to investigate and make findings and recommendations in connection therewith; and
WHEREAS, said Commission; after due inspection, investigation, and study made by itsclf and in its behalt, and a(ter due
consideration of a91 ehdencc and reports offered at said hearing, docs find and determine the following facts:
1. That Ihe proposed use is properly one for which a Conditionul Use Pertnit is authorized by Code Sect i on 18.64. 020 (5) ,
to wit: Permit a quaif hatchery in the M-1 (Light Industrial) Zone.
2. That the petitioner stipulated there would be no commercial processing of quail or
quail products on the premises, including slaughtering of the quail.
3. That it was determined that the proposed use should b~ granted for a period of one
(i) year, subject to review and co~sideration for extension of time by the Planning Comm~ssion
ar~d/or City Counc~l upon request by the petitioner,
4.Tliat the proposed use will not adversely affect the adjoining land uses and the growth and development of the area in
whieh it is proposed to be located.
S.That the size aiid shape of the site proposed for Uie use is adequatc to allow the full development of the proposed use in a
manner not detrimental to the par:icular area nor ro the peace, health, safety, and genernl welfarc oC the Citizens of Uie City of
Maheim.
6.That the granting af the Conditional Use Pemiit under the conditions imposed, if any, will not be detrimental to the peace,
health, safety, and general wclfare oC the Citizens of the City bf Anaheim.
7, That no one indicated their presence at said pu'~?ic hearing in opposition and no
correspondence was receSved in opposition to subject petit.ion.
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FINDING:
That Environmenta- Impact Report No. 131, having been considered this date by the Lity
Planning Commission and evidence both written and oral having been presented to supplement
said Draft EIR No. 131, the Planning Commission believes that s~id Draft E1R No. 131 does
conform to the City and State Guidelines and the State oT California Environmental Quality
Act and, based upon such information, does hereby recommend ~o the City Council that they
certify said EIR No. 131 is in compliance with said Environmental Quality Act,
CI-G ' 1 '
DEV-66~D
RESOLUTION N0, PC74-163
~ ~ ~
NOW, THEREFORE, 13E IT RESOLVED Ehet the Anaheim City Plenning ~Commission does hereby grnnt subject
Petit3on for Conditionel Use Permit, upon the following conditions which ace hereby Eound to be a necessery prerequiaite
to the proposed use of the subject property in order to preserve the sefety end generel walfare of the Citizens of the
City of Aneheim:
l. That subject property shall be developed substantially in accordance with plans
and specifications on Tile with the City of Anaheim marked Exhibit Nos. 1 and 2.
2. That trash storage areas shali be provided in accordance with approved plans
on file with the Office of the Director of Public Works, and that a satisfactory means to
dis~ose oT quail waste shall be agreed upon.
3. That there shall be no commercial processing of quail or quail products on
the premises, including slaughtering or the quail, as stipulated to by the petitioner.
4. That this conditional use permit is granted for a period of one (1) year, subject
:o review and co~sideration ror extension of time by the Planning Commission and/or Gity'
Cou~cil, upon request by the petitioner.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is signed and approved by me this 5th day of August, 1974.
ATTEST:
~~ ~L~.~C-CL/i°; ~ ~TC'.~Q/J(~C_~!-~'2~
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PT.ANNING COMMISSION
STATE OF CALIFOkNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
~
~ , /~
.
C AIRMAN ANAHEIN CITY PLANNING COMtdISSION
I, Pat r i c i a 5 can i an ~ Secretary of the City Planning Commission of tne City of Anaheim, do hereby certiEy that
the foreg~~ing resolution was passed end adopted at a meeting of the City Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim,
held on August 5, 1974, at 2:00 o'clock P.M., by the following vote of the members thereof:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS; GAUER, KING, MORLEY, TOLAR, HERBST
NOES: COMM[SSIONERS: FARANO, JOHNSON
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 5th day of August, 1974.
~
~~t ~L.~,<~~~~~~~~ ~~
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
C2-G - 2-
RE50LUTION N0. PC74-163