PC 74-166~ ~
RESOLUTION NO. PC74-166
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
THAT PETITION FOR VARIANCE N0. 2623 BE GRANTED
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim did receive a veri~ed Petition for Variance
from KARL SATOR, 9361 Hazel Circle, Villa Park, California 92667 (Owner}; TEKFORM
rRODUCTS CO., 2770 Caronai:~ Street, Anaheim, California 92806 (Agent) of certain real
property situated in tne City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California, as
described in Exhihit "A" attached hereto and referred to herein as though set forth in full
; and
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did hola a public hearing at the City Hall in the City of Anaheim
on Aug~st 5, 1974, at 2:00 o'clock P.M., notice of said public heering having been duly given as required
by law and in acrnrdance with the provisions of the Maheim Municipal Code, Chepter 18.68,to hear and consider evi-
dence [oc and ageins4 said proposed veriance und ta investigate and meke findings ~nd rernmmendations in connection
therewith; and
WHEREAS, seid Commission, a[ter due inspection, investigetion, and study mede Uy itself and in its behalf,
and efter due mnsiderelian of oll evidence and reports offered at said hearing, daes find end detennine the following
facts:
1. Thatthepetitionerrequests the following variances frnm the P,nah~,i,i ~tunicipal Code, to
establi,h two free-standing signs:
a. SECTION 1ts.6t.090ie1i) - i~aximum number of siyns. (1 permltted; 2 proposed)
b. SECTION 18.62.090B(I) - Minir•um distance between siqns. 00 feeL required;
229 feet proposed)
2, That it was determined that this variance should be granted for a period of six (6)
months, at :he er;d of whicn time the variance will terminate and only one (1) free-standing
sign would be permitted in accordance with the Anaheim Municipal Code.
3, That there are excep9.lonel or extraordinery circumstances or conditions appliceble to the property involvzd
or to the intended use oE the property that do not apply generally to the property or class of use in the same vicinity and
zone.
4. That the requested veriance is necessery for tlie preservatian end enjoyment of a substential property right
possessed by other property in t;ie same vicinity and zone, and denied to the property in question.
5. That the requested veriance will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to lhe prop-
erty or improvements in such vicinity end zone in which the property is iocated.
6, That no one indicated their presence at satd public hearing in ~~pposttion and r~o
correspondence was received in opposition to subject petitto~.
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FINDING:
That the Director of Development Services has determined that the proposed activity falls
within the defirttion of Saction 3.01, Class 11 of the City of Anaheim Guidelines to the
Requirements for an Enviroi;mental Impact Report and is, therefore, categorically exempt from
the requirement to Tile an EIR. DEV-6G•C
-1- RESOLUTION N0. PC74-166
. ~ .~-~:`-- _.~;..,,,~~,,
; ~;.
~
~^
;n: ~ x~~^-:.
~
SCHEDULE A
The estatc or intcrest in the lund described or referred to in this schedule covcrcd Ly this report is:
a fee
Title to said estate or interest ut the dute hereof is vested in:•
KARL SATOR and EDITH SATOR, husband and wife as joint tenants.
The land referrcd to in this report is simnted in the State oC Culiforniu, County of Orange
and is descril~ed as follo~es: ..~
Those portions of the North half of Lot 7, in Block 11 of the Golden ~
State Tract, shown as Parcels 3 and 4 oa ~ map recozded in book G1,
page 7 of Record of Surveys. County o£ Orange, State of California.
NOTE: Said land is described on the County Tax Assessment Roll far the
fi~ear 1973-74 as A. P. No. 79-04Q-32j CA 01-~39.
~f`~~ , . . •
%•~ 3317'i~~~•.
.:;~ ~ !1;;,
~ ~~.. ~~~ 19~ ~ \ •'
~~;~~ -
. =~ „
vi1~
~.~~fi.~ ~~5.~ %~ti~~;t;;;CE fdC. ~~~3
CLTA Prellminaty Pcport Form ~8~ -~
~~~
~ ~
SCill?I)i'I.E A
TLr. r~tatr ar iutrn•.t itt tlie land ~I~••~•rib~~d or rrf~~rn•d to in tl~i~ ~rlic'duli~ rocr:~•:! I~y lhi+ rc~~ort is:
a fee
Titlc ta sai~ r.tatr or intrn•>t :u tl~r ~lata licrcuf-i-`-~c~tcd in: _
KAFtL SATOR and EDITH SATOR, husband and wife aa joint tE:nants.
The l~n~l re(~~rrcd lo iu 16i, repurt i; situated iu the Stute uf Californiu, Couuty af Orange
anc: is descriLed ;i, fulln».:
That portion oE the North haZf o£ Lot 7 Block 11, Golden State Tract,
as shown on a map thereo£ recorded in book 4, page 66, riiscellaneous
Maps, records of said Orange County, descriUed as follows:
Beginning at the most tiortherly corner of said Lot 7, said corner being
far purposes of this description, the intersection of the center line
of Coronado Street with the center line of Blue Gum Street, as shown
on a map filed in boa:c 61, page 7. Records of Surveys, in hhe office
of thQ County Recorder of said ~range Countys thence South 16° 19' 43"
East alon,g the L•'asteriy line of said Lot 7, being said center line oE
Blue Gum Street, 329.97 feeL• to the Southerly line of said North half
of Lot 7= thenc~ South 73° 37' S1" S~Jes~t along said Southerly line 200.00
feet to the point ot beginning~ thence continuing South 73° 37' S1" West
i.80 feet to a pointj thence North 16° 19' 43" West 329.97 feet to~the
Northerly line.of said Lot 7, being said center lin: of Coronado Street=
thence Llorth 73° 37' 51" East along said Northerly line 140 feetf thence
South 16° 19'-43" East 329.97 £eet to the point of beginning.
NOT.E: Said land i~ described on the County Ta.c Assessment Roll for the
fiscal year 1973-74 as A. P. No„ 74-040~32j CA 01-039. _
: ~ ~. : l: ~ y • ~ ~.~.~
:?•• ,s'; -'~
~~~ ~3~ a ' :~~
~G~~, ~~~
, ' ~.,1 ;~i
1 ~~~~
C~~~ .~~ ~~~ /
P.IIfi•C ias.~
CLTA Pr~llm~nary fle{arl Farm ~TJ~
'i:~ri'r ,.I o~~+. sw+` r~.e: 'r ~ i.:+ ~ w ~
M~/ /.w wwWl.~.r N ~W P"f0
~~•;o~
' ,,' ,~~ ` ~/" '~' p
!~; ~UL 197~ ;n
r.l'a~0 n
~'S:C• , ~,,
.~
: %;
~`i,~':~+'~;G ~lij,~ ~:~~/ •
~
~o~, . , . ~~ S'~ a
~ ~ ` ~1 ~\ ~ ~,//~ ~~
\',,~~•.~ ~ ~ Y / t
~~ ~6,,, /~,/,J,Pr
,vfa+r. ...~..I--'~' '~~ ,`~~/~j~ L
~~+~Jrri..... ~ \ , ~`/~1
T • r y~~..~..r ...++.
. ,~.~'~~'~ ~b-L~....~.......~~
~ Y A.~ r _r
v jF ~' ~,
~
~`p ~~¢ \
:~r• ni ~.~.,~- r~r1 c~,~~ /'~v . ;:+
, NOW, THEREFORE, BE 1T RL~ VED that the Aneheim City Plenning Co~mmission does heceby gmnt subject
i
- Petition for 1/ariance, upo~ the Eollowing conditions which are hereby found to be e necessery precequisite tu e pro-
posed use of the subject propecty in order to preserve the safety end general welEare ofthe Citizens ofthe City of
Anaheim: •
1. That sidewalks shail be installed along Coronado Street as required by the City
Engineer and in accordance with standard plans and specifications on file in the office
of the City Engineer.
2, That subject property shall be develoFed substantially in accordance with plans
and speci`ications on ~ile with the City of Anaheim marked Exhib~t Nos. 1 and 2.
3. That Condition Plos. 1 ar.d 2, above-mentioned, shall be oomplied witn prior to final
building and zoning inspections.
4. That this variance stiall be granted for a period of six (6) months.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is signed and appcoved by me thie 5th day of August, 1974.
~ . ~ /
~'- C IRMAN ANA El CITY PLANNING COMMTSSION
HTTEST:
(~~^.-C-~-r -~r~~~~-CL~~t~t2~cJ
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) as.
CITY 9F ANAHEiM )
I, Patricia Scanlan, Secretery of the City Plenning Commission of the City oE Aneheim, do hereby certify thet
the foregoing resolution wes passed end edopted et a meeting oE the City Pienning Commission o~ the ~ity oE Anaheim,
held on August 5, 1974, et 2:00 o'clock P.M., by the (ollowing vote o[ the members thereoE:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: FARANO, GAUER, JOHNSON, KING, TOLAR, HERBST
NOES: CQMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: CON,MISSIONERS: 110ftLEY
IN WITNES~ WHEREOF, I have heceunto aet my hend this 5th day of August , 1974.
/,r ~/,' /
( ~,C~C,c'~/ ~ ~,LL ,r~4/ ~.
` ~
SECFETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLi,PINING CCMMISSION
V2-G ~2
RES~LUTION N0. PC74-166