PC 74-171~ ~
RE~SOLUTION N0. P~~~-,~~
A RESOI.UTION ~OF THE CITY PLANNING COMMTSS.ON OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
THAT PETITION F'OR WARIANCE NO. 2b24 BE GRANTED
WHEREAS, Ehe City 'Planning Commis~ion of :he City oE P_naheim did receive a verified Petition for Varience
from MICHREL PAM1Ll;K, et a], 242 Da~te ~treet West, Anaheim, California 92805 (Owner) of
cerbain real property situated in tMe City o~ Anaheim, Cnunty of Orange, State of California,
descrlbed as Lot 38 of Tract ~565, City of Anaheim, as per ma;p recorded in book 49, pages 20
to 24 ir.ciusive of MiscelTaneaus Maps, records of said Oranye County,
EXCEPTING 211 oil, gas and other hydrocarbon substancee 1~e1~otiN a de~th of 500 feet from the
surface of said land, but without the right of sur`^c~ w.r:try thereon however, as granted to
Fred C. Pieperbri~k a~d wife, in deed recorded April 21, 1953. ~n book 2490, page 318,
Official Records, and June 3, 1953, in buoSc 25q4, page 67, Official Records~.
; and
14HEREAS, the City Plenning Commission did hold a public henring at the City Hall in the City of Anaheim
ur+ August 5, 1974, at 2:00 o'clock P.M., not:ce of said public hearing having been duly given es required
~y lnw and in accordence'with the provisions of the Meheim Municipnl Code, Chnpter 18.68, to heer and consider evi-
dsnce fc~r and ageinst said proposed variance and to investigate and make findings end recommendations in connection
Qhetecvith; nnd
'AHEREAS, said Commission, eEter due inspection, investigation, and study mede by itself and in itc behalf,
ond after due consideretion of all evidence and reports offcred at said hearing, does find and detertnine the following
facts:
1. Thatthepetitionerrequests the following variance from the-Anaheim Munictpal Code, to
continue t;~e use of a one-car garage:
SECTION 18.24.030(5) - Minimum number of parkinq spaces in a qaraqe. (2 spaces
required; 1 space proposed)
2. That the Waiver, above-mentioned, fs hereby granted on the basis that r,he
petitioner demonstrated that prior to purchasing his home he had no prior knowledye that the
bathruom constructed in the garage was not perm-tted and, therefore, a hardship would be
created if said Waiver was not granted.
3, Thet there ere exceptionel Ar extreordinary circumstences or condilions applicable to the property involved
or to the intended use of 4he prnperty thet do not apply generally to the property or class of use in the same vicinity and
zone.
4, That the requested veciancg is necessary for the preservntion end enjoyment oi a eubstential property right
possessed by other property in the Game vicinity and zone, end denied to the property in question.~
5. That the requested vaciance will noi be materially detcimental to the public welEace or injucious to the prop-
erty or improvements in such vicinity end zone in wliich the property is located.
6. 7hat no one indicated their presence at safd public heariny in opposition and no
correspondence was received in oppusition to subJect petition.
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FINDING;
That the Director of Devetopment Services has dete:mined that the proposed activity f~lis
within the definition of Section 3.01, Class 1 of the City of Anaheim Guidelines to the
Requirements for an Environmentai Impact Report and is, therefore, categorically exempt
from the req~~irement to riie an EIR.
-1- RESOLU710N N0. PC74-171
w ~ s
~ ~
~ NOW, 'Y'HEREFt~RE, BE IT RESOLVED tha; the Aneheim City Plenning Commission does hereby grant subject
PetiYion tor Variance, ~pon the following conditions which are hereby found to be a neceasery preeequisite to the pro-
posed use a( the subject property ie oider to preserve the sefety and general welfare of the Citizens o: the City of
Anshei-n:
1, That the existing structure shall be brought up to the m(nimum standards of tha
C~ty of Anaheim, including the Uniform Buiiding, Plumbing, Electrical, Housing, Mechanical
and FSre Codes as adopted by the City of Anaheici.
2. That aubject 'property shal! be developed substantially in accordance with plans
and s:ec3'ficatio~s on rile wittt the City of A~aheim marked Exhibit Nos. I and 2.
3. That Co;sdit.io~ Nos, 1 and 2, abo~•e-mentioned, shall be aompleted within thirty
days or such furthar time as the Planning Commission may grant.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION ls e:gned end approved by me this 5th day of August, 1974.
~~ ~
i
~ i
~ CElA1RMAN k~IRHE'.t.M CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
ATTEST:
~~t~~,~~~ ~~L.~~.uJ
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
STATE OF CALIF`aRNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) as.
CITY OF ANAH81Fi )
I, Patrieia Seanlan, Secretery of the City Plenning Commission of the City of Anaheim, do heceby certify that
the foregoing res~lutson was pnssed end edopted at a meeting oE the Cih~ Plenning Comr.iission of the City oE Anaheim,
held on AuguSt 5, 19]4, et 2:00 o'clock P.M., by the following vote of fhe members thereof:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: fARANO, GAUER, JUHNSON, KIN6, MORLEY, TOLAR, HERBST
NOES: CONMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONC•
IN WITNESS W!iERF,dF, I heve hereunto set my riend thls 5th day of Au9ust, 1974.
~~~E~I~C~C.,e~ ~ ~-LZLf..~L~LitV
SECRETARY ANAHCIhi CITY PLADiNING COMMISSION
V2•G -2-
RESOLUTION N0. PC74-171