PC 74-178~ ~
RESOLUTION N0. PC74-178
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE C(TY OF ANAHEIM
THAT PET1TfON FOR VARIANCE N0. 2629 BE GRANTED
WHER~AS, thc City Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim did receive a verified Petition for Variancc from
ENRIQUE AND GUADALUPE BECERRA, 1775 West Laurel Place, Anaheim, California 92801 (Owners)
of certain real property situated in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of
California, described as Lot 138 of Tract 1591 as per map recorded in book 54 pages 36,
37, 38 and 39 of Miscellaneous Maps, in the~office of tha county recorder of said county;
and
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did hold a public hcaring at the City Hall in thc City of Analteim on
August 19, 19]4 at 2:00 o'clock p.m., notice of ,aid public hearing having been duly gven as required by law and
in accordance with the provisions of the Maheim Municipal Code, Chapter 18.E8, to hear and consider evidence for and against said
proposed variance and to investigate and make f ndin6s and recommendations in connection therewiUi; and
WHEREAS, said Commission, aftcr duc inspection, investigatio~, and study madc by itself and in its behalf, and aftcr duc
consideration oC all evidence and reports o(fered at said hcaring, does find and determine the Collowing facts:
1. 7'! ~at the petitioner requests a variance from the Anaheim Municipal Code: to a 1 1 oW a del ay for eomp l l anee
with the requirement that a two-car garage must be provided upon conversion of the original
garage into a kitchen and famity room:
SECTION 18.24.030(5) - Re uirement that two arkin s aces be ravided in a ara e. (None
exist
(2) That the above-mentioned waiver is hereby granted for a period of two (2) years,
based on the testimony of the petitioner that prior to purchasing the home, they had no
prior knowledge that a Code violation existed and, therefore, immediate compliance with
the Code requirement would create a hardship for the property ormer.
were entitled toetheaprotectioniofithedCodemprovisionstin this~matter,rsincenotherProperties
property owners have previously indicated desires to have such a building conversion.
(4) That there are exceptional or extraordtnary circumstances or conditions appli-
cable to the property involved or to the intended use, as granted, of the property that
do not apply generally to the property or class of use in the same vicinity and zone.
(5) That the requested variance, as granted, for the preservation and enjoyment of a
substantial property r?ght possessed by other property in the same vicini~y and zone, and
denied to the property in question.
(6) Thai the requested variance, as granted, will not be mater;ally detrimental to the
public welfare or inJurious to the property or improvements in such victnity and zone in
which the property is located.
(7) That three (3) persons were present, two (2) of whom appeared, in opposition to
subject petition.
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FINDING
That the Director of Development Services has determined that the proposed activity
fatls within the definition of Sectlon 3.01, Class 1 of the City of Anaheim G~idelines
to the Requirements for an EIR and is, therefore, categortcally exempt from the require-
ment to file an EIR.
VI- G - 1- RESOLUT I ON N0. PC74-17£i
DEV-66•E
' ~ ~
NOW, THERGFORE, BE IT RESOLVED thet the Aneheim City Planning Commission does heceby gwr.t subject
Petition for Variance, upon the following ccnditians which ace heceby found to be a necessary precequisite to the pro-
posed use of the subject property in occer to preserve the safety and generel welface oE the Citizens oE the Clty of
Anaheim: ,
(1) That the existing structure shall be brought up'to tElectrical,SHousings Mech-
the City of Anaheim, including the Unlform Building, Plumb.ng,
anical and Fire Codes as adopted by the City of Anaheim.
(2) That subJect property shalt be developed substantlally in accordance with plans
and specifications on file with the Clty of Anahetm marked Exhibit Nos. 1 and 2.
(3) That Condition Nos. 1 and 2, above°mentioned, shall be completed within thirty
days or such further time as the Planning Commission may grant.
(4) That this variance is granted for a perlod of two (2) years.
THE FOREGOING RESOLlITION is si~ed end epproved by me this 19th day of August 1974
. ~
HA MAN ANA E CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
ATTEST:
~ ~ ~-~~J
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CTTY OF ANAHEIM )
I, Patritla Seanlan Secretery of the City Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim, do hereby certify thnt
the Eoeegoing cesolution was pasced and adopteei et a meeting of the City Plenning Commission nf the City of Anaheim,
held on pugust 19, 1974 at 2:00 dclock P.M., by the following vote o[ the members thercot:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: GAUER, JOHNSON, KING, MORLEY, TOLAR, HERB:'T
NOES: COMMiSSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: FARANO
II~1 WITNESS WHEREOF, I heve heceunto aet my hand this ~ 9th day of Augus t~ ti 9~~ .
,~ ~ ~ ~ y~ A~ ~A..~-
3ECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION '
V2-G "2'
RESOLU710N N0, PC74-178