PC 74-183. ~ ~ ~
RESOLUTION NO. PC]4-183
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY PLANNA+IG COIdMISSIOi: nF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
RECOMMENDING T~J THE CITY COUNCII:-OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM THAT
PETITION FOR RECLASSIFSCA:tox xo. 74"75" ~~ BE APPROVED
WHF.RF.AS, the City Plenning Commissipn of tha r.ity,of Anaheim did receive e verified Peti 'on Epr Rec sslfica-
tionfrom CRUZ AND MADELINE VARGAS, 1tf39 Mountain View Avenue, Anaheim, Cali~ornia g2 02
(Owners); CARLOS VARGAS, 1839 Mountain View Avenue, Anaheim, California 928U2 (Agen=) of
certain real property situated in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California,
described as Lot 11 of Tract 498, as per map recorded in book 19 page 24 of Misc~llaneous
Maps, in the office of the county recorder of said ~ounty and Lot 12 of Tract 498, as
per map recorded in book 19 page 24 of Miscellane~us Maps, in the office of the county
recorder of said county
; end
WHEREAS, the City Planning Comcrission did hold a yu-lic hearin6 at the City Hell in the City oE Anaheim on
September 4, 1974, at 2:00 o'clock P.M. notice of seid prblic hQOring heving been duly givm es requSred by
lew and In accordence with the provistons aE the tinoMim Muaicipal Code, Chopter 18.72, to hear end consider evidence
for and against seid proposed reclassiEication and to invoati~ate and mnke findings end recommendations in connection
therewith; and
WHEREAS, said Commission, after due inspectia, invesiigstlon, end study made by itself end in its behalf, and
efter due consideration oE all evidence and reports offered et seid hearing, does find end determine the following facts:
1. ThAt the petitioner proposes a reclessificetion of SubJ ect property f rom the R-A (AGR I CULTURAL)
ZONE to the C-1 (GENERAL COMMERCIAL) ZONE,
2. That the Anaheim General Plan designates subJect prope,-ty for commercial-recreation
uses.
3. Thet the proposed reclessificatl'an of sub;ect atnperty is necessery and/or desiroble forthe orderly end pro-
per development of the community.
4. Thet the proposed reclassificetian of subject property does properly telate to the zones und their permi:ted
uses locally esteblished in clqne proximity to subject property snd to the zones and their permifled uses generally esteb-
lished throughout the community.
5. That tl~e proposed reclassification of subject property requires the dedication
and imprevement of abutting streets in accordance wi~h the Circulation Element of the
General Plan, due to the anticipated increase in traffic which will be generated by the
intensification of land use.
6. That one (1) person appeared at said public hearing in opposition, whose
opposition was subsequently withdrawn, and no correspondence was received in opposition
to subject petition.
~NUIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FINDING:
'ihat the Pla~ning Commissiun recommends to the City Council that the subject project be
ex.e~~pt rrom the requirement to prepare an Environmental Impact Report pursuant to the
provisions of the Ca~ifornia Environmental Quality Act.
R_A _1_ RESOLU'fION N0. PC74-183 DEV-66•A
~ ~ ~ ~
NOW, THEREFORE, ~E IT RE50LVED that the Anaheim City Planning Commission does hereby
recommend to the City Council of tlie City of Anaheim that subject Petition for Reclassificatim
be approved ard, by so doing, that Title 18-Zoning of_tt~:Anaheim Municipal Code be amended
to exclude the above described property from the R-A (AGRICULTURAL) ZONE and to incorporate
said described property into the C-1 (GENERAL COMMERCIAL) ZONE upon the following conditions
which are herby found to be a necessary prerequisite to the propased use of subject property
in order to preserve the safety and general welfare of the Citizens of the City of Anaheim:
l, That all engineering requirements of the City of Anaheim along Mountain View
Avenue including preparation of improvement plans and installation of all improvements
such as curbs and gutters, sidewalks, street grading and paving, drainage facilities, or
other appurtenant work shall ba complied with as required by the City Engineer and in
accordance with standard ptans and specifications on file in the office ` the City Engineer;
that street lighting facilities along Mountain View Avenue shall be installed as required
by the Director of Public Utilities and in accordance with standard plans and specificatinns
on file in the office of the Director of Public Utilities; and that a bond in an amount and
form satisfactory to the City of Anaheim shall be posted with the City to guarantee the
installation of the above-mentioned requirements.
2. That the owner(s) of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the sum of
60t per front foot along Mountain View Avenue for tree plantirtg purposes.
3, That trash storage areas shall be provided in accordance with approved plans
on file with the office of the Director of Public Works.
4. That fire hydrants shall be installed and charged as required and determined to
be necessary by the Chief of the Fire Department prior to commencement of structural framing.
That subject property shall be served by und~rground utilities.
6. That drainage of subject property shall be disposed of in a manner satisfactory
Co L•he City Engineer.
7, PYtor to the introduction of an ordinance rezoning subject property, Condition
Nos. 1 and 2, above-mentioned, shall be completed. The provisions or rights grarted by
this resolution shall become null and void by action of the City Council unless said
conditions are complied with within one year from the date hereof, or such further time as
the City Council may grant.
8. That Condition Nos. 3, 5 and 5, above-mentioned, shall be complied with prior to
the commencement of the activity authorized under ~tiis resolution, or prior to the time
that the building permit is issued, or within a pe~iod of one year from date hereof,
whichever occurs first, or such further time as the Planning Commission or City Council
may grr,nt.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTIOM i5 signed and approved by me this 4th day of September, 197~+.
~
IR N ANA E CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
AT7E5T:
~ .n ~-/l
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
STATE OF CALIFORRIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, Patricia B. Scanlan, Secretary of the City Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim,
do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting of the
City Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim, held on September 4, 1974, at 2:00 o'c?ock
P.M., by the following vote of the members thereof:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: FARANO, GAUER, JOHNS~N, KING, MORL~Y, TOLAR, HERBST
NOE5: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
IN WITNE55 WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 4th day of September, 1974.
/`~o ~~id
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
_z_ RESOLUTION N0. PC74-183