PC 74-186.- ' ~ PC74-186 ~
RESOLUTION N0. .
A RESOLUT[ON OF THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION OF~ 49E CITY OF ANAHEIAi
THA1' PETITION FOR CONDITIONAL USE.PERMIT N0. B~ GRANTED
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim did receive a verified Petiticit for Conditional Us~ Permit
from FIAAGEN DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, 777 Silver Spur Rcad, Rolling Hilis, California 90274
(Owner); ROCIO LADEAU, 766 West Cypress, Covina, California 91722 (Agent) of certain real
property situatzd in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California, as
described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and referred to herein as though set forth in full
;and
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did hold a public hearing in the City Hall in the City of Anaheim on
Septembe r 4, 1974, at 2: 00 o'clock p.m., notice of said public hearing having been duly given as required by law and in
accordanee with the provisions of the Anaheim D^.anieip&I Code, Chapter 18.64,to hear and consider evidence for and against said
proposed conditional use and to investigate and make findings and recommendations in connection therewiQi; and
\VHEREAS, said Commission, after due inspection, investigation, and study made by itselC and in its beha!f, and after due
consideration of all evidence and reports offered at said hearing, does find and determine the folloK~ing facts:
1. That the proposed use is properly one for which a Conditional Use Pemiit is authorized by Code Sect i on 18. 40. 060 (g) ,
to wit: permit on-sale beer and wine, in conjunction with a restaurant in an existing
comfnercial shopping center.
2. That Lhe petitioner stipulated that on-sale beer and wine would be in conjunction
with the sale of food only, and that no bar was proposed to be a part of the operation.
3. That a similar use was previously approved in the subject area.
4.That the proposed use will not adversely affect the adjoining land uses and the growth and development of the area in
which'st is proposed to be located.
S.That the size and shape of tlie site proposed fo: tlie use is adequate to allow the full development of the proposed use in a
mnnn^.r not detrimental to the particular area nor to the peace, health, safety, and genernl welfare of tlie Citizens of the City oi
P.naheim.
6.That the grantingof the Conditional Use Pemiit under the conditions imposed, if any, witl not be detrimental to the peace,
heslth, safety, and general welfare of the Citizens of the City of Anaheim.
7, ihat no one indicated their presence at said public hearing in opposition and
no correspondence was received in opposition to subject petition.
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FINDING:
Tliat the Director of Development,Services h2s.determined that the proposed activity falls
within th~ definition of Section 3.~1, Class 1 of,the City of Anaheim Guidelines to the
kequirements for an Environmental Impact Report and is, therefore, categorically exempt from
the requirement to file an EIR.,
CI-G ' 1 '
RESOLUTION N0. PC74-186
DEV-6fiA
'--i
~,.~." . .
.~ ~ I r I ~
~~~~~~~ lt q Jl
~C k
SCH~DULE C
THE LAND REFERRED TO ?N THIS FOLICY :S D~SCRIBED AS FOLLO:JS!
THCSc PQRT1Cid5 OF LOTS 6r 7 AND 8 OF TF.ACT N0. 935~ IN THE
CITY CF AN,~",HcI~4- COU~JTY OF ORAnGr".~ STATE OF .ALIFOR\IA~ AS
PER P~n~ nEGORCED IN BOOK 30+ FA~cS 1 AMD 2 OF ~~1ISCELLAt~E0U5
P1AP5~ IN THc OFFICE OF THE CCUNTY RECORC°_R OF SAIG COL'NTY~
DESCRIBED AS FOLLO~•JS~ '
CONtiiENCIidG ~~T THE IfdTERSECiION OF THE EAST~RLY I.;NE QF ,~AID
LOT 7 WITH Ttic SOUTH[~LY LINE OF STATE H?GHl•~AY VII-CRA-43-3
AS SAID HiGHt•:AY i5 SHO+lP~ ON MAP FILED IN BOOK 74r P:~GE 2 OF
RFCORD O` StrRVEYS. I\ THE OFFiCE OF SA?D COUNiY RECeRDERS THEn!CE
ALOP~G SAiD EAST[RLY _It~E~ 50UTH i° 14' 24~~ 41E5T 5&7.3C FEET
TO A POIPlT OF NCPv-Tar;GE~~:CY W:TH A CURVE CQtJCAVE NORTHERLY AND
HAVING A~AD?US OF 275.OC r=EETr A RAD:AL LI~E OF SAID GUR`dE
TO SAID PCINi BEARS SOUTH 6° 22' 07" 4JEST: THENCE 'rlESTERLY
APJD hORTH1:ES7ERLY ALC1G SAID CURVE THROUGH A CE~TRAL A~GL[
OF 36° 07' 42" AN ARC DISTANCE OF 173.40 FEETt THENCE NORTH
47° 30' 11~~ l•lEST ?82.65 FEET TO THE BEGIfJNiP:G OF A 7AfVGENT
CURVE CONCAV~ SCUTHERLY A~D HkVING A RA~IUS OF 3Z5.00 FEEii
THENCE NORTHWESTERLY AND WESTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE TFIROUGH
A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 65~ 55' 49" AN ARC DISTA~GE OF 373a4fi FEET
TO A POINT ON THE ~lESTERLY LINE OF .~,AID LOT 6r SAID POIP7T B°ING
THE TRUe ?OINT OF BEGINN:NG OF THIS DESCRIPTIONi THEPdCE ~LONu
SAID WESiERLY LINE Ai~D ITS SOUTHERLY PROLO~GAT?ON~ SOUTH 2° ~
10' 16" EAST 65.53 FEET TO A POINT OF NOi\-TANGENCY 4~ITH A CURVE
WHICH IS CONCENTRIC 4;ITH AND 60.00 FEET SGUTHERLY~ N1E~SURED
kADiALLYr FROM SAID LAST MENTIOt~ED CURVE~ A RADIAL ~INE OF
SAID CURVE TO SAID LAST M1iENTIOi~t.D POIMT BEARS NORTH 28° 34'
41" ilESTi THEtdCE EASTERLY AIVD SOUTHEASTERLY ALOfdG SAID CONCEP~TRIC
CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL A~dGLE OF 71° 04~ 30~~ AN nRC CiSTANCE
OF 328.73 FEET: TrIE"dCE SOUTH.47~ 30~ 11" EAST 182.u5 FEET TO
THE BEGi\~:I~;~ OF TAF:GENT CURVE COh1CAVE ~tiORTHEP.STERLI' A~D I-IAVIt~G
A RADIUS OF 335.00 FEETt THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY ALO~VG SAID CURVE
TNROJGH A CE~~TRAL ANGLc OF 12° ZFi' 06" AN ARC DiSTA?~CE OF 72.90
FEET TO THE WESTERLY Li\E OF SAID LOT 7s THENCE ALONG SAID
4JESicRLY LI~E~ SOUTH 0° 54~ 44" 'vlEST 177~29 FEET TO A LINE
l~'FIICH IS PARALLEL WITH AtiD 1225 FEET PdORTHERLY~ NiEASURED A7
REGfiT A~vGLESe FPOi•1 THE SOU;'HF_RLY LIi~£5 OF SA'!Q LOTS 7 AtdC Bi
THEnCE ALOI~;G SiyID PAr^.ALL•cL L2NE SOUTH 8S° 12' 16'~ EAST 405.23
FEET TO k POI~:T TN THE 4JE5''EP.LY LINE OF PRC?QSED Ibi?ERIAL H:GH!•JhY~
90 FEET DlIDEr SAID ~dESTERLY LINE BEiPIG F, ~C~;-TANGEf:T CURVC
CQPJCA.VE '.•JESTERLY AND H0.VING A R~DIUS 0~ 1:69.75 FEET c A FkD?AL
L:RE OF SF~IL~ CURVE TO SAIC P01NT f3EAR5 NORTH 81° 1:' 36" EASTi
THE~yC~..;~JC('~T~ERLY ALO~G SAID CURVE THROUGH A C~NTZNL ANGLE Or
5°,;~5~. ~,CO" 'APl hRC D? 5'i A~•J.E OF 120.:? r EE i i THE~CE CONT I I~U I~G
AL'0\G SITD, :•:ESTCRLY LIf:Er f~ORTH lk° 3Q~ 00" 'rJEST 1S9.39 FEE7
.Ti~, TFEG1~:~o~iV~ING OF A TAMGEfVT NFVE CONCAVE EASTERLY AI~D HAVI~:G
AcRP.C.:L•'J,~IO? 1545.C0 F'EETc 7HENCE NORTHERLY i,LOP.G SAID CURVE
T'~~iP.OU~l1::A'~-CE'NT~AL ANGL[ OF 16° 21~ ~4~' AN AnC a:ST:1i:CE 0~ ~+41e29
F~f?; ~_FFSENCE NORTH ?~ 51' 54'~ EAST 4.17 F[ET TO THE BEGIitii.IP~G
OF~'A_,.iA~GE;V,~'~CURVE •:ufc..~VE SOUTH:•lESTEf:LY l,h;D HAVI1v A RAJIUS
0~ 25tiC0.:FEETr SAi'L• :URVE 3EIf~G TA(~GENi AT ITS I:ESTERLY iER~':~:.'S
.. _ ~r~,+~~ ~~~f~.
. , ,., .,, ,,,,
~ !t~'l. ~l~.:L ('Ll1~~ui ~.
(~...~.. ~~rr n[t;L•uT C,lil
~wm~oi~~~1~
. ~ J~
~:~-~'~ ` . . ~ . , .
~>-~ ` - ~ .
WITH SAID SOUTHER!Y LINE OF STATE HIGHWAY VII-ORA-43-Bs THE~ICE
NORTHERLY~ NORTH+JESTEFLY AND '+JESTERLY ALOhG SAID CURVE THROUGH
A CENTRAL A\GLE OF 8%° O1' 06" Ali ARC DISTAfJCE OF 37.97 FEET
TO SAID SOUiHERLY LI~Et THE~CE ALO~G SAID SOUTHEP,LY LI~E- NQRTH
85° 09~ 12" 1JEST 549.01 FEET TO TNE BEGIN~lING OF A TANGENT
CURVE CORCAVE SOUTHERLY AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 5000.00 FEETi
THENCE WESTcFLY ALO~G SAID CURVE A~VD ALONG SAID SCUTHERLY LIN~
THRQUGH A CENTRAL AtiGLE OF 2° 24' S2° AN ARC DISTAiVCi OF 210o7G
FEET TO THE 'v:ESTERLY LIfvE OF SAID LOT 7: THENCE ALONG 5AID'
P:ESiERLY LINE• SOUTN 1° 05' 44•" WEST 283.34 FEET TO THE NORTHVuESTERLY
CORNER OF SAID LOT 6: THENCE f~LONG SAID WESTERLY LTUE OF LOT ~
6~ ~ 50UTH 2° 10' 16" EAST 102.10 FEET TO THE TRU~ PO?NT OF BEGINNIP~G_
~~
~y678~~, ~ '
~ .
,
auc ~g~a .
.,,~n ~ .
, ci ~`;ia l
. (t°c;~; • T n c
~,~2C~lZi~ t~_ rnFi~~l ~iJ.~~
.~ ~,;u. ~~.,r_ r~.,,:
488335 PA6~ 7 __.
~ r_ ~ ~
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Aneheim City Plenning Commission does hereby gcent subject
Petition for Conditionel Use Permit, upon the following conditions which ece hereby found to be a necessery precequisite
to the pcoposed use of the subject property in ocder to p:esecve the safety and general welface of the Citizens of the
City of Aneheim:
1. That subject property shall be developed substantially in accordance with plans
and specifications on file with the Cit~~ of Anaheim marked Exhibit Nos. 1 through 5:
2. That the service of on-sale beer and wine shall be in conjunction with the sale
and service of food, as stipulated to by the petitioner.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is signed and approved by me this 4th day of September, 1974.
CH 1RMAN AN C1TY PLANNING COMMISSION
ATTEST:
11~~~~,,~ .~ ~~~1~
SECREI'ARY ANAEiEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
STATE OF CALIFOi2NIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
(:ITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, Patricia B.Scanlan, Secretary of the City Planning Commission oE the City of Anaheim, do heceby cectifythet
the foregoing resolution wes passed md adopted at a meeting of the Cily Plenning Commission of the City of Aneheim,
hetd on September 4, 1974, at 2:00 o'clock P.M., by the following vote of the membets theceoE:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: fARANO, GAUER, JOHNSON, KING, MORLEY, TOLAR, HERBST
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSEN'f: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 4th day of September, 1974.
~~~.~,~ .J
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
C~G - 2-
RESOLUTION N0. PC74-186