PC 74-190_ ~ '- ~ ~
RESOLUTION NO
PC74-190
A RESQLUTION ~JF THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
RECCm:1~NDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIAI THAT
PETI'fION FOR RECLASSIFICATION NO. 74'75'9 BE APPROVED
WHEREAS, Ehe City Plan~ing Commission of the City of Aneheim did receive a verified Petition Eor RecJe s' ice-
U~m from ANAHEII~t HIGH SCk00L DISTRICT, 50~ North Crescent Way, Anaheim, California y2~~
(Ownerj; C. MICHAII., INC., 8501 Bolsa Avenue, Midway City, California 92655 (AgenC} of
cexiei.n r.esl propezt,y situated in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of
Gel•Stor::'ia, described as the Westerly rectangular one-half of Lot 17 of Anaheim Extension,
as showr. on a map made b~ William Hamel and Filed December 21, 1868 in the offiae of the
County Recorder of Los Angeles County, Calif.ornia: •
; and
k"• :!?~J~F, the City Plenning Commission did hold e public hearing et the City Hell in the City of Aneheim on
Septer~ber !.f,.,, 1474, at 2:00 o'clock P.M. notice of seid public hearing having been duly given es requfred by
law and in nei;otdnnce with the provisions of the Anahelm Municipal Code, Chepter 18.72, to hee: end consider evidence
for ert'd ' eainst suid proposed reclessification end to investigete and make findings end recommendetions in connectlon
therew!:h; and
i4H~.REAS, seid Commission, aEter due inspection, investigation, end sLudy mede by itself end in itR Lehalf, and
a(ter dae consideration of all evidence and reports oEfered at said hearing, does [ind end determine t:~e fnilowing fects:
1. That the petitioner proposes e recla~sification of the above described property from the R-A
(AGRICULTURAL) ZONE to the RM-4000 (MULTIPLE-PAMILY RESIpF.P:TIP,L) ZONE.
2. That, although the Anaheim General Plan deeignates tl~e subject property for a
junior high school site, the proposed zoning ie deemed to be appropriate at the aubject
location, and appropriate action will be taken to reflecL• the change in land use policy
by amending the General Plan.
3. That the proposed reclessificetion ot subject property is necessery end/or desireble !or the orderly and pro-
per developmarnt of the community.
4. 'rn+,~t the proposed reclessificetion of subject property does properly relate to the zones and their perm:tted
uses lacally esteblished in close oroxlmity to subject property end to the zones and their permitted uses generally estab-
lished throughout the cammunlty.
5. ThaC the proposed reclassification of suLject pzoperty requiYes the dedication
and improvement of abutting streets in accordance with the Circulation Element of the
General Plan, due to the anticipated increase in traffic which will be generated by the
intensification of land use. ~
6, That no one indicated their presence at said public hearing in opposition, and no
correspondence was received in opposition to subject petition.
R~A ~1~ RESOLUTION N0. PC74-19U oev-ec•A
_ ' ~'~ ~ ~
EP?VTRPh'~ffiNTAL 1MPACT REPORT FINDING:
That Environm~~n'tal liz~pact Report No. 133, having been considered this date by the
City ilanning Commi2i'+,~lY ~'<'~d evidence both written and oral having been presented to
supp`~-.ent :~r•1Ld dfaft i.?F. 133F tt`;~ Planning Commissiun be'l.ieves that said draft EIR No. 133
does c~nform to che~~iF.y and State Gui~+~u.'f.:~es and the State of California Enviroamental
Quality Act and, Ue~efi upon s~rch .Lnformat.ton, does hereby reco'mmend tu the City Couneil
that they certify said EIR *?c~ ].~.3 i,s it: r.pr•p:iance with said Envirur.mental Quality Act.
NOW, THLR~FORE, SiE 1'S RESUL~YE'U thri! the Anaheim City Planning Cormnission dces hereby
recommend to the C?.ty Cou.~cil of the City of Anaheim that subject Petition for Reclassi-
fication be approved and, uy so doing, th:~t Title 18-Zoning of the Anaheim Municipal Code
be amended to exclude the ebove described property from tlie R-A (AGRICULTURAL) ZONE and
to incorporate said deszribed pro~erty into the RM-40~0 (MULTIPLE~FAMILY RESIDENTIAL) ZONE.
upon the f~llowing c:uzditioits °.~hich are heieby found to be a necessary prerequisite to the
proposed use of subj~ct f•~ru~~;cty in order to preserve the safety and general welfare of the
Citizens of the City „f .,.;4F.beim:
(1) That a f~:eal tract mRp of subject property shall be submitted to and approved
by the City Council and then b~,'iecorded In the office of the Oc'ange County Recorder.
(2) That the owner(s) of the subject property shall pay to the City ot Anaheim the
appropria~e park and recreation in-lieu fees, as determinezmit is issuedriate by the City
Council, aaid tees L-o be paid at the time the building p
(3) That trash storage areas shall be provided in accordance with approved plans
on file witl~ the office of the Director of Public Works.
(4) That fire hydrants shall be installeJ and charged as required and determined
to be necessary by L•he Chief of the Pire Department prior to coam~encement of structural
framing.
(5) That a 6-foot masonry wall shall be constructed along the east and so~uth
property lines.
(6) That all afr-conditioning faci.lities shall be property shielded from view, and
the sound buf.fered frem adjacent properties.
(7) That subject property shall be developed substantially in accorJance with plans
and specificar..ions on file with the ~ity of Anaheim marked Exhibit Noo. 1 through 12.
(8) That [he petiCioner sha1Z submit ftnal floor plans and elevations to the
Planning Commission and City Council far.• approval.
(9) PrLor to the introduction of ~n ardir~anceTheZ~rovisio seor rightstgranted~byon
I~os. 1 and 8, above-mentioned, shall be completed, p
this resolution shall tecome null and void by ac'tion of the City Council ~~nless said
conditions are complied with within one yeer fram the date hereo£, or such further time
as the City Council may grant.
(lOj That Condition Nas. 3,5,6, and 7, ebAVe-mentioned shall be complied with prior
to final bullding and zoning inspections.
Tlir FOREGOLNG RESOLUTIUN is signed and appruved by me this 16th day of Sept:ember, 1974.
~
,~~ f _ r
` CFiAIRMAN ANAI 1M C' 'PY PLl+.NNING COMMISSION
ATTE:'[ ;
~ ~,~ ~ ~~z~~l
SES.'kETARY ANAfIEIM CIT PLANNItdG COMMISSION
_2_ RESOLUTION'N0. PC74~190-..
. ^ ' '~'
. ~ ~
STATE C~F CALIFORNIA )
COU^1TY OF ORANGE ) ge•
CI'TY OF ANAHEIM ~ )
I, Patricia Scanlan, Secretary of the City Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim, do
hereby certify that the forcgoing resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting of the
City Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim, held on Septesber 16, 1974, at 2:00 0'clock
p.M., by the following vote of the members tnareof:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: FARF+NO, GALtER, 70HNSON, KING, MORLEY, TOLAR, k~RBST
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSION~RS: NONE
IN Z~ITNESS WHEREDF, I have hereuntu set my hand thia 16th day of September, 1974.
,~~~.~-> ~ ~ ~.z~
SECRET.ARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
_g_ RE~OLUTION N0. PC 74-I90