PC 74-197~ ~
RESOLUTION D10. PC74-197
A RESOLUTION QF THE CITY PLANNING C01dMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE C1TY OF ANAHEIM THAT
PETITIOt7 FOR RECLASSIFICATICN NO. ?4-~S' ~ 2 BE APPROVED
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim did i n i t i ate a Pet i t i on 'for RecLa55-
iPication on certain real property situated in the City of ,4naheim County of Orange, State
of California, as described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and referred to herein as though
set forth in full
; end
WHEREAS, the City Planning Cnmrt~ission did hold a public hearing et the City Hell in the City of Anaheim on
September 30, 1974, at 2:00 o'clock P.M. notice of said public heering having been duly given es required by
law end in eccordance with the provisions of the Anaheim hTunicipel Code, Chepter 18.72, to hear and consider evidence
for and against seid oroposed reclassification end to investigete and make findings end recommendations in connection
therewitti; and
WHEREAS, seid Commission, aEter due inspection, investigation, end study made by itself and in its behelf, and
aEter due consideration of all evidence and ceports ofEered at seid hearing, does Eind end determine the following fects:
~ 1. That thE Planning Commission proposes a reclassi€ication of the above described
property from the County of Orange Rl (Single-family Residence) District to the City of
Anaheim R-A (AGRICULTURAL) ZONE.
2. That the proposed reclassification is in conformance with the la~d use designation
on the Anahein General Plan.
3, That annexation of subject property to the City of Anaheim under the Colorado-
Crescent Annexation is currently pending.
4. That approval of this reclassification would establish R-A zoning on Yhe property
as a holding zone pending finalization of a development zone at a later date.
5. That this reclassification is granted subject to completion of annexation of
subject property to the City of Anaheim.
6. Thet the proposed reclessificetion of subject property is necessery and/or desireble ior the orderly and pco-
per development oE the community.
~,Thet the pcoposed reclessifice~ion o£ subject property does properly relate to the zones nnd their permitted
uses locally established in close proximity to subject property end to the zones end their permitted uses gPnerally esteb-
lished throughout the community.
8. That ne one appeared in op~osition to said reclassification.
ENVlRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FINDING:
That the Director of Development Services has determined that the proposed activity falls
within the definition of Section 3.01, Class 1 of the City of Anaheim Guidelines to t.he
Requirements for an Environmental Impact Report and is, therefore, categorically exempt
from the requirement to file an EIR.
R-A -1- RESOLUTION N0. PC74-197 OEV-66-A
r~~J!T. ~.. ':i
1~!...,.~Y.s.~ . . . .- ~.;••a•••~. .:d • .~ ..... ..... . ~_h.
. . ~ . . ~ ' , . '.t . . ~¢, ' . ,.... • ~ ~
~ . ~~I~I'~' "~„
~,
~ ~ . : .. ~o~s~ .
COLOIU+DO-CAESCEdT ANNEXATZOH "
~ .
~ • CITY OF AfSABEIK
, That parcel of land located in the County of oranqe~ Seate of California,
' being a poztion of the Southeast quarter and the Northeast ctuarter of
~ • Section 12, Township 4 South, Range 11 We~t, S.B.H. 6 M., described as
~ followss
, ' ~ , Seginning at a point in the existinq City limit line oE tha City oE
. ~ J~naheim. said point bcinq in thc southvest cozner oE thQ Magnoiia- •
' Crescent Annexation ccrtified by the Secretary of State Janu.ary 31, 1955,
• said point ~•: also being in thc narthwest corner of the tk3gnolia-Crescent
~ ~ ~ , ]lnnexation Ho. 2 to th. City ~eE Anaheim,, eertified by t:ia Secretary of
~ ~ State May 11~ 1956; khence S 0' 13' SS" E~ 345.£eet xeaving said Magnolia-
. ' • Czcscent Annexation looundary and followinq along a portion of the westesly
, • annexation boundary line of aaid Magnolia-Creseent Annexation No. 2 to an
' i intcrseetion vith a portion of thc nort2:erly annexation boundary line of
'. . 1 thc West Anaheim Annexation No. 2 Annexation to the City of Anaheim '
'. ' ' i certified by thc Secretary of State t~Wy 11,~1956; thence Ieaving said
'• ' ~ ; !la9nolia-CSesacnt Annexation No. 2 baundary line and following along a
. , ~
. „. poztion oE the northerly annexation'boundary line o£ said Weat Anaheim
" ~• ' Annexation No. 2 S 89' 40' 43" W, 26~ Eeet; N 0' 13' S1" W, 345 feet to
~ •' an intersection with thc southerly annexation boundary line of thc City
• ~ of 8uena Park as eatablished by the Dale Street No. 1 Annexation to
• , (~ .
I tho City of Bcena Park certi.ficd .by the Secreta=y of State January ,24,
~ .
~~ , ~ • • .. '
' • 1'ago 1 of 2 . '
. ~ : .
. • , ~ 2~a567tsg;a~~~' .
.r ~ • ~ . - , . 64 Q ~.~ ~ . . . , . . ~ 419~ A A„
. , • ~ ' ~ ~ • ~ . ~• c KE~~1V~° `~' •
. . , ., N ,~,CN~ `J"~ `
. . . ' . c-N ~~v~`? ~:.. .
. • ' ' • y~S.~CC.~~~~,i
. , ~ , ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ' .
• I ,
~ .
~ ;;~~r.~nss. ~,o. .:.,~:,.- -~~-.~a.~.. ..
~+~'; ~ _:~w"'•
. _, _
A~
~
~
' -,r•- _ .,.-~_ ~ ~^'„n:r~^-. . . ~ . .......w• • -~•~m. +v~o :5~' . . -..,w~-.;r ~ •M"e^. p^ ~• . ;
• .' ~ . . ~ . , . . . . .
.. PLOp09Cd • , . ~ .
' Colorado-Crescen[ AnnE.Yatioa . , -
• ~• ~ . •
• to '
' . eity o! Rnaheim • • •
, 1955: thencc N 0' 17' S1" W, 15 Eeet leavinq said Wcet Anaheim •
~ Itnnexation No. 2 boundary line and fellowing along a portion oE ~t1i~e ,
• • lnst nentioned B~~ena Park City boundary 2;ine to an intcrsection aii.h s
• lino pazallcl with and 30 Eeet north of tha centcrline of Crescent Avei~uc.
. • eaid point oE interoceeion teinq a point in thn aoutherly annexatioa
' I boundary line of the GreenlcaE No. 1 Annexati~in zo the City of euena
f thenrn
. park eeztificd by the Sceretary of State July 27. 1964;
• Dl 89° 40° 43" F~ 265 tcet leaving naid Dale St=eet't7o. 1 Ann~dr~~A'
• . boundary and f~llowinq along the southerly annexatien boundasy L'~ne of '
' qaid Gseenleaf No. 1 Annexatioa to eaid City oE Sucna PArkr ~-xsn be'<~sg .
• • Said parallel line to an intcrsection with tha Mesterly 7.:i'AG ?~ the
~ .
• , aforeeacntioned Magnolia-CZescent Annexatioa to the City o£ iic+~i'heim=
• ~ I• theneo S 0' 13' S1! E, 15 feet lcaving last mentioned Sueaa Pazk
.• ' ,•lu~nexation boundary lines and following alonq a portion oE tho laqC .
• ' ,,, `•~ : mentioncd Anaheirr Annexation boundazy to tlse peint of beginning. : "
, ' ~ ~ ' ~ . y~~,,,r,~,,,~';.r..,,,,..,..,..~..~....,+.r. -..~-~--w.-.-.n--~~.- . _ .
• ~ , . • ~.....+, • . ' • . • • • ' .
~ , ~. '' .~. ' ~ , ., , '. . , .,.. ..• . . . ,' . . . • . .
l . . .
. • . ~'• . . , . •• •• , . .~. . ~, • .•
, ~' , • . . - • • . . .
.~ , , I , Paga 2 of 2 . • . ' . ' ' ' .
. ,
I ' ~ ; • ' ', ~67a.r;?);ti~ .
.r ! ' ~ • ~ ' ~ ~ ~ • , ' ,~9'~ ~ '~ ~~`'{:
. . i ' • . ' . ' , o F,Q ~g~ ~~c~ .
• e . . _ . . ' ' • c ~ 'pl~~ n j .
• , ' !. • , • . . a 'Qti~ ;~y~oN .: ~
. , , • , • . . ~.:~ a~~` ~=~ . ~
' i . . . ' ~ . `io~ 2`~,c%
. . . • ~ • ~%~~:i.7 ~
• , , j . : • . • .
. s , , . : ,
. ' ~ ~ ' . . • • :
i .
• ~ ~ ( - 'j ~ ` ~ ~ :.,,, .
• ~ "•'(;I_~~$S. ~!b.
~ ,
r NON, TH'EREFORE, BE IT ~LVE~ tl~at the Asehaim City P1ennln~mmission does haeby :ccommend
to the City Counci!. of the Cit~ of P.neheim thet aubj~c4 Petltibn for Reclaseificatlon be approved aad, bq so doing,
that Title 1&Zoning of the Anahei~ Mnniclpel Code 'be ameaded to exclude the ebove descdbed proYetty from the
County of Orar.ge kl (Single-family R'e.sidencej District and to incorporate said described
progerty into the Cit~y of Anaheim R-A (AGkILIfL'fUFAL) ZONE, upon the following conditicn
which is he~eLy fr.uc+d ~o be a necessary pre,requisite to the proposed use of subject property
ir, ordee' to prese r.~e the safety and ge~era3 welEare of the Citizens of the City of Anaheim.
1. That these reclassiflcatiart proceedings are granted subject to t~~e completion of
,,sner,~tion of subject ~roperty tn the City of Anaheim.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is signed and opproved by me this 30th day of September, 1974.
. ~
AIRMAN A A IM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
AT.TEST:
L/JQ-C~.C/ ' ~~
SECRETARY PRO TEM ANA CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY ~JF ANAHEI"d )
ro tem
I, Aletha Burgess, Secretery~oE the City Planning C~mmission of the City oE Anaheim, do hereby certity thal
the foregcing resolution we~ ppesed and adopted et a meeting of the City Plenning Commissien of the City of Aneheim,
held on ~~eptember 30, 1974, at 2:00 o'clock P.M., by the following vote of the members thereot:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: FARANO, GAUER, HERBST, KING, MORLEY, JOHNSON
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
AHSENT: COMMISSIQNERS: TOLAR
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I heve hereunto set my hand thie 30th day of September, 1974.
~t~~GL/ ~c~ ~
SECRETARY~ANAHEIM C1TY PLAN I~1 COMMISSION
PRO TEM
RESOLUTION N0. PC74-~97
R2-A "z"