PC 74-2~
RESOLUTION f~ PC74-2 ~
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION O 44 HE CBE ~T~EDHINMPAR'"
THAT PETITION rOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
WHEREAS, the City Planning ~ommission of the City of Anaheim did teceive a verified Petition for Con-
ditional Use Permit from CLIFFORD H. HEMMERLING, in care of Jack Anderson, 2333 North
Broa3way, Santa Ana, California 92706, Owner; S.E. SCHOLL, 15?4 Ganesh P1ACe, Pomona,
California 91768, Agent oi- certain real property situated in the City of At:sheim, County
of Orange, SCate of California described as The East half o£ the nort8east quant~he f'
the northeast quarter of Section 17, Township 4 south, Range 10 west, oartly
Rancho San Juan Cajon de Santa Ana, and partly in the Rancho Los Coyotes, as per map
recorded in Book 51, Page 10 of Miscellaneous Maps, in the offir_z of the County Recor~9er
of said co~nty. ~XCEPT from said east half the northerly 411.00 feet of the easterly
303.00 feet, as described in the lease to Big Boy, Euclid, Inc., recorded Aug~ist 13,
1968 in Book 8689 Page 869, of official records of said county. ALSO EXCEPT i'rom sa:d
east half that porLion lying southerly of the northerly line of the land described in
the lease to Market Basket, recorded August 13, 1965 in Book 7629 Page 975, of said
Official Records. ALSO ~XCEPT from the remainder of said east half, the northerly
66.00 feet
; and
WHEREAS, the CityPlenning Commission did hold a public hearing at the CityHell in the City of Anaheim
on Januery 7, 1974 at 2:00 o'clock P.M., notice oE seid public hearing having been duly given
es required by law and in eccocdance with the pcovisions oEthe Anaheim Municipel code, Chapter 18.64,to hear
and considec evidence for and against said pcoposed conditional use end to investivate and make findings and
cr.commendatians in connection thecewith; end
WHEREAS, seid Commission, efter due inspection, investigation, and study mede by itselE and in its be-
half, end after due eonsidecation oE all evidence and ceports offeced at said hearing, does find and determine the
tollowing fects:
1. Thet the proposed use is properly one for which a Conditionel Use Permit is autharized by Code Section
18,64.020(3)(d) to wit: establish an automobile sales agency and service fscil~ty, with
waivers of:
SECTION 18.40.070(4)(a)2.f.
a - Minimum number of off-street parking spaces.
. (134 spaces required; 80 spaces proposed)
SECTION 18.62.09DB(1)
b - Maximum number of free-standinQ siQns.
. (One siQn permLtted; three signs proposed)
SECTION 18.62.090B(1)
c - Minimum distance between free-standin~ signs.
. (300 feet required; 170 feet and 130 feet
proposed)
d. SECTION 1tS.62.090B(2i - Minimum siRn heit~ht. (Eight Eeet required;
five feet proposed)
e. SECTION 18.62.090B(2) - Maxi«~u~ sign height, (35 feet permitted;
7 feet proposed)
SECTION 18.62.090B(5}
f - PermiCted location of free-standinq signs.
. (Minimum 120 feet from north and south
property lines required; 85 feet from north
property line and 45 feet from sauth prop-
erty line proposed)
g, SECTION 18.40.Q70(2)(a)6 - Minimum required parkin~ area landscapinR.
osed)
2/
r~
0
d
i
p
.
p
;
re
(2.0% of parking area requ
SECTION 18.62.090A
h - Maximum free-standing aggre~ate area of sit~ns.
, (350 square feet permitted; 398 square feet
proposed)
-1-
RESOLUTION N0. PC74-2
. ~ ~
2. That the petitioner stipulated to withdraka7, of Waivers 1-a, I-c, 1••e, 1-g
end 1-h, above-mentioned.
3. That Wai~er 1-b, above-mentione3, is hereby granted on the basis that the size
of the signs would cor.form to the maximum ~ermitted aggregate free-standing sign area,
and that two of the free-standin~ signs were directionel and determined to be essential
for the proposed use.
4. That Waivers i-c and 1-f, above-mentioned, are hereby granted on the basis
that due to the width of the subject property, a hardship would be imposed which would
prevent essertial signing for the pzoposed use.
5. That the petitioner stipulated to providing a 20-foot wide landscape strip
along the entire westerly property line adjacent to residential uses.
6. That the petitioner stipulaited that the westerly portion of si~.bject property
proposed to be paved would be used for sto•rage ~f ne•.: automobiles.
7. That the petitioner was present with counsel at said public hearing a:id rec-
~gnized that future hardships might be created by an overpass at Lincoln Avenue and
Euclid Street, which has been under discussion by City officials and the California
State Division of Highways, and that the petitioner requested that approval of ~he Con-
ditional Use Permit be made subject to *_heir investigation and examination of any pro-
posed plannin~ of the California State Division of tIighways for said overpass, which, if
constzucted, miSh~necessitate changes to the submitted plans for devel.opmeat of subject
property. .
8. That the proposed use, as granted, will not adversely affect the edjoining land
uses and the growth and development of the area in which it is proposed to be located.
9. That the size and shape of the site proposed for the use, as granted, is ade-
quate to allaw the full development of ttie proposed use in a manner not detrimental to
the particular srea nor to the peace, health, safety, and general welfare of the Citizens
of the City of Anaheim.
10. That the grant~ng of the Conditional Use Permit under the conditions imposed,
if any and as granted, will not be c;etrimenCal to the peace, health, safety, and general
welfare of the Citizens of the City of Anaheim.
ENVIRONtdENTAL IMpACT RRPORT FIIJDING:
That the Planning Commission, in connect3on with an ExempCion Declara~iun Status request,
finds and determines that the proposal would have no significent environmental imp~ct and,
therefore, recommends to the Ci.ty Council that no Environmental Impact StaCement is neces-
sary.
NOFI, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning Cocmciission does hereby
grant in part aubject Petition for Conditionel Use Permit, upon the following conditions
which are hereby found to be a necessary prerequisite to the proposed use of the subject
p^c~erty in order to preserve the safety and general welfare of the Citizens of the City
nf Anaheim:
(Y) ihat all engineering requiremenCs of the City of Anaheim, along Euclid Street
including preparation of improvement plans and tnstallation of all improvements such as
curbs and gutters, sidewaTks, streee.grading and paving, drainage faciiities, or other
appurtenant work aha11 be complied with'las required by the City fingineer and in accordance
with standard plans and specifications oe f~~le in the offi.ce of the City Engineer; Chat a
bond in an amount and-form satis£actory to the City of Anaheim shall be posted wiCh the
City to gnarantee the installation of the above-mentioned requirementa.
(2) That the ovmer(a) of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the sum
of 60..cents per front foot along ~uclid Street for tree planting purposes.
(3) Th~t appropriate water assessment fees as deCernined by the Directox• oi Public
Utilities shall be peid tu the City of Anaheim prior to the issuance of a building permit.
(4) That all air condi,tioning facilities shall be properly shielded from view, and
the s~und buffered from adjacent properties.
(5) That subject property shall be developed substantially in accordan:.e Wi*end15ng
and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim marked Exhibit Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4 ,
with the additionaY provision that a 20-foor. wide landscape strip shall be provided along
the entire westerly property line, as stipulated to by the petitioner.
~2 RESO;.UTION N0. PC74-2
~
(6) That Condition Nos. 1 8nd 2, abot~e-mentioned, s'hall be complied with prior to
the commencement of thc activity Su'thorized undpr this resoluti~n, nr prior to the t_ime
that the huilding permit is is~ued, or within a period of one year Erom date hereof,
whichever occurs first, or such further time as the Planning Commissior, may grant.
(7) That Condit.ion Nos.4 and 'S, above-mentioned, shall be complied wil•h prior to
fin~l building and zoning inspections.
THE FOREGOING RESOZUTION is signed and approved by me this 7tY~ day of January, 1974.
.Bti~/~~'~/5o~-ys fi_- ,/w/~
CNAIRMAN ANAHEZM CITY,PI.ANNING COMMTSSION l
ATT~ST:
~~ ~ Q~' ~~ui~'-'~'~-
SECRETARY ANAHEbNI CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
STATE OF CALIFORI~IA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss~
CITY OF ANAitEII3 )
I, Patricia B. Scanlan, SacreCary of the City Plan~ning Commission of the City of
Aneheim, do hereby cert.i£y that the fosegoing resolution was passed and adopted at a
meeting of the City Planning Coimnission of the City of Anaheim, held on January 7, 1974,
at 2:00 p.m., by the foilowfng vote of the members thereof:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: FARANO, HERIIST, KING, SEYM~UR, GAUER.
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONG.
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have her~euntc set my hand this 7Ch day of January, 1974.
~~~
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
- 3-
RESOLUTION NQ. PC74-2